Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Browning Pass Efficiency by Receiver

AIRWOLF
AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
The NCAA passer efficiency rating isn't great, but it is pretty easy to calculate.

Here is Browning's passer efficiency rating by receiver:

Pettis: 256.36
McClatcher: 252.24
Ross: 222.16 (based on my recollection that Browning's first INT was a pass intended for Ross)

All Others: 146.07

Obviously a huge drop off from the Top 3 WRs to everybody else. The All Others rating is right on top of Luke Falk's actual pass efficiency stat. Troy Williams, for reference, is at 127.3 for the season.

I wonder if replacing Pease with Hamdan has made a difference?

Comments

  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,566
    So Browning is better at passing to Andrew Baccelia and Aaron Fuller than Troy Williams and Luke Falk are to their entire team.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    So Browning is better at passing to Andrew Baccelia and Aaron Fuller than Troy Williams and Luke Falk are to their entire team.

    Daniels has more targets than Fuller and Baccelia combined, and Carta-Samuels threw some of those passes to Fuller and Baccelia, but your general point is still accurate.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,581
    If Daniels had hands that average would be higher
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Why do you hate Baylor?
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    AIRWOLF said:

    The NCAA passer efficiency rating isn't great, but it is pretty easy to calculate.

    Here is Browning's passer efficiency rating by receiver:

    Pettis: 256.36
    McClatcher: 252.24
    Ross: 222.16 (based on my recollection that Browning's first INT was a pass intended for Ross)

    All Others: 146.07

    Obviously a huge drop off from the Top 3 WRs to everybody else. The All Others rating is right on top of Luke Falk's actual pass efficiency stat. Troy Williams, for reference, is at 127.3 for the season.

    I wonder if replacing Pease with Hamdan has made a difference?

    How did you break this down? Can you remove passes that were thrown away?
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    I didn't do anything that sophisticated. Going from memory, I recall Browning's first INT was intended for Ross (I could be wrong) and his second was intented for Gaskin (sure on that one). I also don't recall Carta-Samuels even attempting a pass intended for any of the top 3 receivers. I guess that could be off slightly too, but if it is, it is only by an attempt of two.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,334 Standard Supporter
    Gladstone said:

    If I had to nitpick anything about this offense besides the 4th and 1 play call at Arizona, it would be the lack of Daniels. I expected huge things from him this year.

    He's always been kind of a doog legend. Then again, Mathis was too, but he's been killing it this year.
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    Brownings first INT was intended for Chico, but good post