AP top 25 forgot the pac12 plays football, and ranked 3-3 Ole Miss
WTF, 6-1 utah is sucking hind teat to 2-loss Wiscanson, FSU, Tennessee and Oklahoma? How does the AP have 8 SEC teams ranked? There's prolly 4 guys here who understand the inequity, bias and cocksucking going on behind the scenes in regard to the SEC, AP, ESPN and the playoff.
How is a 3-loss Ole Miss ranked over a USC team under Darnold who would beat ole miss by 3 tds, and challenge bama now? I picked Colorada to win south before season started, but now believe USC will rep the south. And ole miss sits above them in the AP? Ole Miss' s ranking is the most pathetic bias ive ever seen in the AP, in 30 years. The SEC has 4 teams deserving of a ranking.
A 6-1 Houston is ranked 5 spots above a 1-loss Utah, from the pac12? Did the American conference suddenly win 2 figure national titles? For beating a shit show 2-loss FSU ? Its not even funny, its alarming. These same voters-writers will cast votes, well neglect to cast votes, for the pac12 when it matters most...when the playoff committee tallies shit up.
Colorado is the best 2-loss overlooked team in the country and sits beneath 3-3 ole miss who hasnt beaten anybody. Buffs had Michigan beat before Sifo got hurt. They just beat a very underrated and explosive ASU team by 30. If colorada was in the SEC theyd be sitting at #14 in the AP. The SEC is the worst its been in 20 years and 8 teams are ranked? Open your fucking eyeballs.
Most of you have nothing to do as youre off the Petersen wagon. Watch a little football, educate yourselves with all your downtime. See you in 2018 with the new head coach and OC you braniacs all wanted in the off season.
Comments
-
USC would challenge Bama now? Hahahahaha
-
Ole Miss didn't get plungered 52-7 by Alabama. I don't know if they should be ranked and they will forever be a fraud, but Ole Miss has lost lost to good teams. USC has lost to Stanford.
I agree about Utah behind Tennessee. It's not that Utah is good, but Tennessee sucks.
I'm with you on the SEC bias. It exists. That said, the Pac 12 is looking like they kind of suck. -
I agreed with it all up until the USC part.
Ole Piss (lol, I know you fags love those) has "good" losses, but so fucking what? They're still losses. It's not the almost beat FSU and Alabama contest. Win some damn games, crackers. -
Darnold beat an average Colorado team by 1 td at home, lost to an insanely overrated Utah team on a choke job, and beat some shit tier teams up. He does not change USC dramatically, they're lucky the South sucks so bad.
-
It might have something to do with Your Utes squeeking by the FPI boosting OSU and your 3 loss Trojans boat racing a now 2-5 DickRod who we needed overtime to beat.
On another note, Shaw finally discovered he has shit QBs, went back to the run game and beat the limp Leppies in South Bend while Leach's ground raid hung on to beat Ballfag. -
The pac-12 is as drecky as its ever been. We have no excuse but to win out.
-
Ole Miss would give UW serious problems. Easily one of the dozen or so most talented teams in the country. They good.
-
-
Too long. Did not read. Do not regret my decision. Maybe if it wasn't about football I would.puppylove_sugarsteel said:3-3 ole miss is ranked? Along with the heisman, college football fans should just ignore the AP, so too should the committee. Its not relevant. The SEC got its chompers on that metric too.
WTF, 6-1 utah is sucking hind teat to 2-loss Wiscanson, FSU, Tennessee and Oklahoma? How does the AP have 8 SEC teams ranked? There's prolly 4 guys here who understand the inequity, bias and cocksucking going on behind the scenes in regard to the SEC, AP, ESPN and the playoff.
How is a 3-loss Ole Miss ranked over a USC team under Darnold who would beat ole miss by 3 tds, and challenge bama now? I picked Colorada to win south before season started, but now believe USC will rep the south. And ole miss sits above them in the AP? Ole Miss' s ranking is the most pathetic bias ive ever seen in the AP, in 30 years. The SEC has 4 teams deserving of a ranking.
A 6-1 Houston is ranked 5 spots above a 1-loss Utah, from the pac12? Did the American conference suddenly win 2 figure national titles? For beating a shit show 2-loss FSU ? Its not even funny, its alarming. These same voters-writers will cast votes, well neglect to cast votes, for the pac12 when it matters most...when the playoff committee tallies shit up.
Colorado is the best 2-loss overlooked team in the country and sits beneath 3-3 ole miss who hasnt beaten anybody. Buffs had Michigan beat before Sifo got hurt. They just beat a very underrated and explosive ASU team by 30. If colorada was in the SEC theyd be sitting at #14 in the AP. The SEC is the worst its been in 20 years and 8 teams are ranked? Open your fucking eyeballs.
Most of you have nothing to do as youre off the Petersen wagon. Watch a little football, educate yourselves with all your downtime. See you in 2018 with the new head coach and OC you braniacs all wanted in the off season.
-
Ole Miss and Tennessee are both jokes. Belong in the pac-12 south.
-
USC is a completely different team. Theyd play bama entirely different in week 7 vs week 1 with a statue taking snaps. USC could win the south because they have legit talent, a legit QB and a motivated team. Credit Helton. That was an impossible turnaround yet he pulled it off. I thought USC would fold, I think everyone did. I dont see them losing again, maybe to UW. USC can get to rose bowl and Im sure Helton has made that perfectly clear.RoadDawg55 said:Ole Miss didn't get plungered 52-7 by Alabama. I don't know if they should be ranked and they will forever be a fraud, but Ole Miss has lost lost to good teams. USC has lost to Stanford.
I agree about Utah behind Tennessee. It's not that Utah is good, but Tennessee sucks.
I'm with you on the SEC bias. It exists. That said, the Pac 12 is looking like they kind of suck.
They are a few plays away from being a 1-loss team. Think of that next time the AP ignores them and the pac12. USC could walk through the AP 25 through10. I know they'd beat Clemson right now. The spread would be Clemson -7 1/2 on a neutral field. USC would match Swinney's starting 22 with better athletes and Oline and hole punch Dabo straight up. Clemson is horrible right now, shouldnt be in top 8. USC will be ranked in a few weeks and playing WSU in the pac12 championship. Or maybe another nameless team. Or Colorado.
If pups initial preseason pick Colorada gets In pac12 title game I hope Petersens squad finds a w a y to get through the deepest conference in the country with no more than 2 losses. Id like UW to play the buffz. SC will be a VERY good team in December. A VERY difficult team to beat twice should they win in Seattle. With Darnold USC will be the 2nd-3rd best team in the conference in November. -
Football talk. You ignorant bitches should try it sometime...its catching on around the country. Well east of the Rockies anyway
-
In the oppressed gay hating non-legal weed regions. What a coincidence. Roll Tide.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Football talk. You ignorant bitches should try it sometime...its catching on around the country. Well east of the Rockies anyway
-
Your football talk is awfulpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Football talk. You ignorant bitches should try it sometime...its catching on around the country. Well east of the Rockies anyway
-
they beat 3 bad teams, how is that a "turnaround"puppylove_sugarsteel said:
USC is a completely different team. Theyd play bama entirely different in week 7 vs week 1 with a statue taking snaps. USC could win the south because they have legit talent, a legit QB and a motivated team. Credit Helton. That was an impossible turnaround yet he pulled it off. I thought USC would fold, I think everyone did. I dont see them losing again, maybe to UW. USC can get to rose bowl and Im sure Helton has made that perfectly clear.RoadDawg55 said:Ole Miss didn't get plungered 52-7 by Alabama. I don't know if they should be ranked and they will forever be a fraud, but Ole Miss has lost lost to good teams. USC has lost to Stanford.
I agree about Utah behind Tennessee. It's not that Utah is good, but Tennessee sucks.
I'm with you on the SEC bias. It exists. That said, the Pac 12 is looking like they kind of suck.
They are a few plays away from being a 1-loss team. Think of that next time the AP ignores them and the pac12. USC could walk through the AP 25 through10. I know they'd beat Clemson right now. The spread would be Clemson -7 1/2 on a neutral field. USC would match Swinney's starting 22 with better athletes and Oline and hole punch Dabo straight up. Clemson is horrible right now, shouldnt be in top 8. USC will be ranked in a few weeks and playing WSU in the pac12 championship. Or maybe another nameless team. Or Colorado.
If pups initial preseason pick Colorada gets In pac12 title game I hope Petersens squad finds a w a y to get through the deepest conference in the country with no more than 2 losses. Id like UW to play the buffz. SC will be a VERY good team in December. A VERY difficult team to beat twice should they win in Seattle. With Darnold USC will be the 2nd-3rd best team in the conference in November. -
You didn't pick Colorado pre season. Nice try.
-
Puppy moving the goalposts again.
-
That's why he won't bring it on my Gronk thread today. He knows I'll swat that weak shit out of there like Richard Sherman.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your football talk is awfulpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Football talk. You ignorant bitches should try it sometime...its catching on around the country. Well east of the Rockies anyway
-
No. They're not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:USC is a completely different team. Theyd play bama entirely different in week 7 vs week 1 with a statue taking snaps. USC could win the south because they have legit talent, a legit QB and a motivated team. Credit Helton. That was an impossible turnaround yet he pulled it off. I thought USC would fold, I think everyone did. I dont see them losing again, maybe to UW. USC can get to rose bowl and Im sure Helton has made that perfectly clear.
-
If he did (and he didn't), it's going to look retarded by the end of the season.CuntWaffle said:You didn't pick Colorado pre season. Nice try.
-
I always love flagging a pumpy post
-
Ask steel2CuntWaffle said:You didn't pick Colorado pre season. Nice try.
-
They turned to my darkhorse after S2 laughed at me relentlessly. Absolutely picked them. Of course I wasnt communicating with you cuntless degenerates much in August
-
Spit the semen out baabs and try it yourself.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your football talk is awfulpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Football talk. You ignorant bitches should try it sometime...its catching on around the country. Well east of the Rockies anyway
-
Newfish, you ask for permission to address me. Darnold went on the road to 6000ft, in one of the best homefield advantages I n football, in his 1st college start and lost thanks to his defense. Now back to the schoolbooks sonny. What, dawgs #5, just joined HH? Putz little fuckerPostUWUO16DawgFan said:Darnold beat an average Colorado team by 1 td at home, lost to an insanely overrated Utah team on a choke job, and beat some shit tier teams up. He does not change USC dramatically, they're lucky the South sucks so bad.
-
Pumpy quadruple pump special
-
And yes he changes SC dramatically. What team you watching sonny? Notice the difference in production at every position offensively , team rushing, passing? JuJu tripled his production. Seems someone is responsible
-
This thread sucks.
-
Pup's split personality references are an auto-chin.
-
The Clemson DL versus the USC OL is a devastating mismatch..... and it's not a mismatch for Clemson.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
USC is a completely different team. Theyd play bama entirely different in week 7 vs week 1 with a statue taking snaps. USC could win the south because they have legit talent, a legit QB and a motivated team. Credit Helton. That was an impossible turnaround yet he pulled it off. I thought USC would fold, I think everyone did. I dont see them losing again, maybe to UW. USC can get to rose bowl and Im sure Helton has made that perfectly clear.RoadDawg55 said:Ole Miss didn't get plungered 52-7 by Alabama. I don't know if they should be ranked and they will forever be a fraud, but Ole Miss has lost lost to good teams. USC has lost to Stanford.
I agree about Utah behind Tennessee. It's not that Utah is good, but Tennessee sucks.
I'm with you on the SEC bias. It exists. That said, the Pac 12 is looking like they kind of suck.
They are a few plays away from being a 1-loss team. Think of that next time the AP ignores them and the pac12. USC could walk through the AP 25 through10. I know they'd beat Clemson right now. The spread would be Clemson -7 1/2 on a neutral field. USC would match Swinney's starting 22 with better athletes and Oline and hole punch Dabo straight up. Clemson is horrible right now, shouldnt be in top 8. USC will be ranked in a few weeks and playing WSU in the pac12 championship. Or maybe another nameless team. Or Colorado.
If pups initial preseason pick Colorada gets In pac12 title game I hope Petersens squad finds a w a y to get through the deepest conference in the country with no more than 2 losses. Id like UW to play the buffz. SC will be a VERY good team in December. A VERY difficult team to beat twice should they win in Seattle. With Darnold USC will be the 2nd-3rd best team in the conference in November.
