Why Pete is not on Track

Comments

• Nevadaduck Member Posts: 193

  October 2015 edited October 2015

  You don't get this place at all.
  
  LEAVE!

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

  October 2015 edited October 2015

  HuskyInAZ said:

  show previous quotes

  DerekJohnson said:

  The team Don James had in 1975 would have gone 11-3 with last year's schedule.
  
  But there was a loud clamor to fire James 4 games into the '77 season, and then he beat Oregon 54-0 and the program took off. Pete has that opportunity Thursday night, to win a game that really matters and start building some momentum and capital.

  .....and the team Gil Dobie had in 1915 would have gone 12-1.
  
  1975 was 40 fucking years ago. The vast majority on this board were not even born. Perhaps it's time to move on from the glory days of the Dawgfather.

  Can't we just aspire to go 6-6 every year? That what the Cougs do after all.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

  October 2015

  HuskyInAZ said:

  Do you all get tired of the endless circle jerk?

  Go die.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,479

  October 2015

  HuskyInAZ said:

  show previous quotes

  RoadDawg55 said:

  
  
  

  HuskyInAZ said:

  DerekJohnson said:

  The team Don James had in 1975 would have gone 11-3 with last year's schedule.
  
  But there was a loud clamor to fire James 4 games into the '77 season, and then he beat Oregon 54-0 and the program took off. Pete has that opportunity Thursday night, to win a game that really matters and start building some momentum and capital.

  .....and the team Gil Dobie had in 1915 would have gone 12-1.
  
  1975 was 40 fucking years ago. The vast majority on this board were not even born. Perhaps it's time to move on from the glory days of the Dawgfather.

  What are your expectations for Petersen?

  It has nothing to do with Don James. I was a student at UW and went to every home FB as a student, and Don James was the coach throughout. Great memories. But I'm an old fuck. Times change, situations change. We are here today, our roster, our coaching staff. That is what's important. Priorities for Petersen ????
  
  1. Keep improving the talent level, and get to some semblance of balance class-to-class.
  2. Improve on-field performance.
  3. Evaluate and manipulate the coaching staff as needed based on #2.
  4. Run a disiplined program, where #1 buys in, works hard and improves.

  Im genuinely curious, why is winning not a priority? Personally, I can't stand crap football. Drives me nuts.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

  October 2015

  If Peterman's team demonstrates improvement from the youths as the season progresses, Browning stays healthy and flashes brilliance from time to time... Enough to allow cardboard cutout to poach his way to a top 15-25 recruiting class in 2016... Peterman may still be the guy.
  
  Oh yeah... Got to have a winning season and bring home the Unicorn Trophy... no embarrassing losses to dogshit teams in mid Dec bowl games.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,462

  October 2015

  HuskyInAZ said:

  Do you all get tired of the endless circle jerk?

  

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• creepycoug Member Posts: 23,807

  October 2015

  SpoonieLuv said:

  show previous quotes

  HuskyInAZ said:

  Do you all get tired of the endless circle jerk?

  

  I thought I was here to talk about the Canes. But slices set me straight before taking some time off to move blow in the U district.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 46,190

  October 2015

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  show previous quotes

  HuskyInAZ said:

  DerekJohnson said:

  The team Don James had in 1975 would have gone 11-3 with last year's schedule.
  
  But there was a loud clamor to fire James 4 games into the '77 season, and then he beat Oregon 54-0 and the program took off. Pete has that opportunity Thursday night, to win a game that really matters and start building some momentum and capital.

  .....and the team Gil Dobie had in 1915 would have gone 12-1.
  
  1975 was 40 fucking years ago. The vast majority on this board were not even born. Perhaps it's time to move on from the glory days of the Dawgfather.

  Can't we just aspire to go 6-6 every year? That what the Cougs do after all.

  Cuogs would piss all over themselves to have a .500 life.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

  October 2016

  HeretoBeatmyChest said:

  because @Auburndawg thinks he's on track. He has the same record as DJ after 18 games and Harbaugh was 7-11 so he's on track according to Aubs.
  
  Yeah...2 years ago UW was similar to the team Harbaugh inherited, which was one of the worst teams in conference history. DJ beat USC and UCLA in his first season and was 4 points from going to the Rose Bowl.
  
  I don't care how young or how much the personnel sucks. Nothing is on track when you have the worst offense in the league (all the advanced stats say so for 2014 and now).

  I found the thread that Chest wanted to be bumped.

  10 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 66,052

  October 2016

  

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Passion Member Posts: 4,622

  October 2016

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  show previous quotes

  HeretoBeatmyChest said:

  because @Auburndawg thinks he's on track. He has the same record as DJ after 18 games and Harbaugh was 7-11 so he's on track according to Aubs.
  
  Yeah...2 years ago UW was similar to the team Harbaugh inherited, which was one of the worst teams in conference history. DJ beat USC and UCLA in his first season and was 4 points from going to the Rose Bowl.
  
  I don't care how young or how much the personnel sucks. Nothing is on track when you have the worst offense in the league (all the advanced stats say so for 2014 and now).

  I found the thread that Chest wanted to be bumped.

  What's worse - stalking teen boys, or keeping track of old threads? Jesus.

  -4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

  October 2016

  Passion said:

  show previous quotes

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  HeretoBeatmyChest said:

  because @Auburndawg thinks he's on track. He has the same record as DJ after 18 games and Harbaugh was 7-11 so he's on track according to Aubs.
  
  Yeah...2 years ago UW was similar to the team Harbaugh inherited, which was one of the worst teams in conference history. DJ beat USC and UCLA in his first season and was 4 points from going to the Rose Bowl.
  
  I don't care how young or how much the personnel sucks. Nothing is on track when you have the worst offense in the league (all the advanced stats say so for 2014 and now).

  I found the thread that Chest wanted to be bumped.

  What's worse - stalking teen boys, or keeping track of old threads? Jesus.

  I don't know if it is more amusing that he would bump a thread that makes him look like an idiot, or that it is impossible for him to bump one that doesn't.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,433

  October 2016

  To be fair, if you bumped about any thread from October 2015 on this site, it would look like this. Somewhere in there is Gladstone's "Petersen is not the guy" essay. I'm sure that has some very well thought-out reasoning as well.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516

  October 2016

  Passion said:

  show previous quotes

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  HeretoBeatmyChest said:

  because @Auburndawg thinks he's on track. He has the same record as DJ after 18 games and Harbaugh was 7-11 so he's on track according to Aubs.
  
  Yeah...2 years ago UW was similar to the team Harbaugh inherited, which was one of the worst teams in conference history. DJ beat USC and UCLA in his first season and was 4 points from going to the Rose Bowl.
  
  I don't care how young or how much the personnel sucks. Nothing is on track when you have the worst offense in the league (all the advanced stats say so for 2014 and now).

  I found the thread that Chest wanted to be bumped.

  What's worse - stalking teen boys, or keeping track of old threads? Jesus.

  Doubly hurtful

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Doogstone Member Posts: 202

  October 2016

  bananasnblondes said:

  To be fair, if you bumped about any thread from October 2015 on this site, it would look like this. Somewhere in there is Gladstone's "Petersen is not the guy" essay. I'm sure that has some very well thought-out reasoning as well.

  It's often been said.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

  October 2016

  What @HuskyInAZ is trying to say is:
  
  Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James Don James

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

  October 2016

  Passion said:

  show previous quotes

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  HeretoBeatmyChest said:

  because @Auburndawg thinks he's on track. He has the same record as DJ after 18 games and Harbaugh was 7-11 so he's on track according to Aubs.
  
  Yeah...2 years ago UW was similar to the team Harbaugh inherited, which was one of the worst teams in conference history. DJ beat USC and UCLA in his first season and was 4 points from going to the Rose Bowl.
  
  I don't care how young or how much the personnel sucks. Nothing is on track when you have the worst offense in the league (all the advanced stats say so for 2014 and now).

  I found the thread that Chest wanted to be bumped.

  What's worse - stalking teen boys, or keeping track of old threads? Jesus.

  Since you suck at this, let me share a helpful link:
  
  http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/search

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813

  October 2016

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  show previous quotes

  Passion said:

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  HeretoBeatmyChest said:

  because @Auburndawg thinks he's on track. He has the same record as DJ after 18 games and Harbaugh was 7-11 so he's on track according to Aubs.
  
  Yeah...2 years ago UW was similar to the team Harbaugh inherited, which was one of the worst teams in conference history. DJ beat USC and UCLA in his first season and was 4 points from going to the Rose Bowl.
  
  I don't care how young or how much the personnel sucks. Nothing is on track when you have the worst offense in the league (all the advanced stats say so for 2014 and now).

  I found the thread that Chest wanted to be bumped.

  What's worse - stalking teen boys, or keeping track of old threads? Jesus.

  Since you suck at this, let me share a helpful link:
  
  http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/search

  point Sven

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

  October 2016

  Do you all get tired of the endless circle jerk?
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,378

  October 2016

  allpurpleallgold said:

  Do you all get tired of the endless circle jerk?
  

  The endless circle jerk keeps me coming back day after day.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter