We? match up well with Stanford
2015/10/24 Washington 14 - Stanford 31 L
2014/09/27 Washington 13 - Stanford 20 L
2013/10/05 Washington 28 - Stanford 31 L
2012/09/27 Washington 17 - Stanford 13 W
2011/10/22 Washington 21 - Stanford 65 L
2010/10/30 Washington 0 - Stanford 41 L
2009/09/26 Washington 14 - Stanford 34 L
2008/09/27 Washington 28 - Stanford 35 L
2007/11/03 Washington 27 - Stanford 9 W
2006/11/11 Washington 3 - Stanford 20 L
Comments
-
FREE HARVBAUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Gameday Champions, fuck off Sven.
-
Washington beats Stanford.
-
The 41-0 beatdown was one of my all-time favorite Sark blowouts.
-
How did we score 14 points last year? It felt like we had about 10 yards of offense.
-
I'm hearing that historically Washington plays Stanford CLOSE.
-
reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
I had to leave at the half as the row of nerds and old people in front of me wasn't into the things I was screaming at *our bench.HuskyClaws said:How did we score 14 points last year? It felt like we had about 10 yards of offense.
-
Stanford went through the motions in last year's game and still thoroughly dominated. It didn't even seem like they were playing well. I remember Race and other old timers commenting about how it reminded them of what UW used to do back in the day.
-
Starting KJ wasn't ideal.RoadDawg55 said:Stanford went through the motions in last year's game and still thoroughly dominated. It didn't even seem like they were playing well. I remember Race and other old timers commenting about how it reminded them of what UW used to do back in the day.
-
Ah, yes, the Suddenly Senior gameTierbsHsotBoobs said:Everybody says so.
2015/10/24 Washington 14 - Stanford 31 L
2014/09/27 Washington 13 - Stanford 20 L
2013/10/05 Washington 28 - Stanford 31 L
2012/09/27 Washington 17 - Stanford 13 W
2011/10/22 Washington 21 - Stanford 65 L
2010/10/30 Washington 0 - Stanford 41 L
2009/09/26 Washington 14 - Stanford 34 L
2008/09/27 Washington 28 - Stanford 35 L
2007/11/03 Washington 27 - Stanford 9 W
2006/11/11 Washington 3 - Stanford 20 L -
We have a GREAT defense
-
I was there, that capped off my student viewing career 14-32 (8-25) FMFYFEwhatshouldicareabout said:
Ah, yes, the Suddenly Senior gameTierbsHsotBoobs said:Everybody says so.
2015/10/24 Washington 14 - Stanford 31 L
2014/09/27 Washington 13 - Stanford 20 L
2013/10/05 Washington 28 - Stanford 31 L
2012/09/27 Washington 17 - Stanford 13 W
2011/10/22 Washington 21 - Stanford 65 L
2010/10/30 Washington 0 - Stanford 41 L
2009/09/26 Washington 14 - Stanford 34 L
2008/09/27 Washington 28 - Stanford 35 L
2007/11/03 Washington 27 - Stanford 9 W
2006/11/11 Washington 3 - Stanford 20 L -
Condolences.LoneStarDawg said:
I was there, that capped off my student viewing career 14-32 (8-25) FMFYFEwhatshouldicareabout said:
Ah, yes, the Suddenly Senior gameTierbsHsotBoobs said:Everybody says so.
2015/10/24 Washington 14 - Stanford 31 L
2014/09/27 Washington 13 - Stanford 20 L
2013/10/05 Washington 28 - Stanford 31 L
2012/09/27 Washington 17 - Stanford 13 W
2011/10/22 Washington 21 - Stanford 65 L
2010/10/30 Washington 0 - Stanford 41 L
2009/09/26 Washington 14 - Stanford 34 L
2008/09/27 Washington 28 - Stanford 35 L
2007/11/03 Washington 27 - Stanford 9 W
2006/11/11 Washington 3 - Stanford 20 L -
Because I'm feeling pedantic, Nunes was still the starter in 2012. And it's not like Hogan was ever much better.Meek said:reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
Well Stanford only plungered UW twice in 10 years. Clearly it's an even match.
-
Only was the starting QB on 3 rosebowel teams, but still...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Because I'm feeling pedantic, Nunes was still the starter in 2012. And it's not like Hogan was ever much better.Meek said:reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
Could have been National Championship teams with a good QB.BallSacked said:
Only was the starting QB on 3 rosebowel teams, but still...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Because I'm feeling pedantic, Nunes was still the starter in 2012. And it's not like Hogan was ever much better.Meek said:reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
You're right. He totally sucks.FremontTroll said:
Could have been National Championship teams with a good QB.BallSacked said:
Only was the starting QB on 3 rosebowel teams, but still...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Because I'm feeling pedantic, Nunes was still the starter in 2012. And it's not like Hogan was ever much better.Meek said:reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
Yeah but you cant discount the emotion on the field
-
Or a good head coach instead of Black Les Miles.FremontTroll said:
Could have been National Championship teams with a good QB.BallSacked said:
Only was the starting QB on 3 rosebowel teams, but still...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Because I'm feeling pedantic, Nunes was still the starter in 2012. And it's not like Hogan was ever much better.Meek said:reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
Vegas says UW is back.
-3
ESPN says 61% UW victory.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/game?gameId=400869124
Furd's offense is suspect.
Furd is getting 137 yards passing/game.
First team to 28 pts wins.
If Van Winkle stops betting on the UW games,
UW will be back. -
It's a good defense but they should DIAFF for last night. They looked like a Nick Holt D.RaceBannon said:We have a GREAT defense
-
Yeah, if they had Watson they would have won the natty. Hogan was a good QB.FremontTroll said:
Could have been National Championship teams with a good QB.BallSacked said:
Only was the starting QB on 3 rosebowel teams, but still...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Because I'm feeling pedantic, Nunes was still the starter in 2012. And it's not like Hogan was ever much better.Meek said:reminds me to never forget Sark's 2 signature wins....against 2 back ups Nunes and Corp.
-
Hyperbole.RoadDawg55 said:
It's a good defense but they should DIAFF for last night. They looked like a Nick Holt D.RaceBannon said:We have a GREAT defense
D was overall very disappointing, yes, but the adjustments between the first 2 dumpster fire series and the end of the 2H were solid and we effectively stonewalled them during that entire stretch. Nick Holt is way too harsh IMO. -
300 yards rushing is a Nick Holt defense.Gladstone said:
Hyperbole.RoadDawg55 said:
It's a good defense but they should DIAFF for last night. They looked like a Nick Holt D.RaceBannon said:We have a GREAT defense
D was overall very disappointing, yes, but the adjustments between the first 2 dumpster fire series and the end of the 2H were solid and we effectively stonewalled them during that entire stretch. Nick Holt is way too harsh IMO.
HTH -
Well. Washington does lead the all time series. . . ..BallSacked said:I'm hearing that historically Washington plays Stanford CLOSE.
http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/records/opp-opp.pl?start=1869&end=2015&team1=Washington&team2=Stanford
-
Heard on the P12 network today that both of Furds starting CBs are injured and won't be playing on Friday. Anybody know if this is true? Is about the only glimmer I see.
-
when you compare that to some of the other top teams namely oregon that we have faced over our stretch of suckitude, we do
-
I actually do like our match up this year against Stanford...
I hate our match up against Oregon though. They will be a better version of what we saw at Zona on Saturday.
I think we beat Stanford and lose at Oregon as a top 5 team. Having Oregon fans storm the field after beating UW a 12th straight time will be special
