Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Crowning Browning as Great is Premature

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Gladstone said:

    you're going against the sperg hive narrative so you will get flamed because this forum kind of sucks now, but this is great post. LIPO

    edit: jesus there we go lol
    If Browning is better now, he'll prove it over the next 2 months. He hasn't proven shit yet.

    Prematurely popping off is dumb.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,988

    If Browning is better now, he'll prove it over the next 2 months. He hasn't proven shit yet.

    Prematurely popping off is dumb.
    Nobody is prematurely popping off ... most Browning believers say that he has to validate his growth in conference

    That said you are an idiot if you can't see the growth in Browning ...

    As with most sophomores he's got areas to improve in ... but he also has the tool set to QB this team to its 2016 goals
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    Nobody is prematurely popping off ... most Browning believers say that he has to validate his growth in conference

    That said you are an idiot if you can't see the growth in Browning ...

    As with most sophomores he's got areas to improve in ... but he also has the tool set to QB this team to its 2016 goals
    You like to say no one is prematurely popping off then you pop off prematurely in the next sentence.

    You do that.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,988

    You like to say no one is prematurely popping off then you pop off prematurely in the next sentence.

    You do that.
    This isn't an either or type of situation ...

    He's clearly in more command of what's going on around him compared to 12 months ago ... you have to be either blind or a massive troll to not realize that.

    That being said, there's plenty of growth that he has to prove on the field and that begins Saturday ...

    You're definitely pressing as of late trying to hang onto the narrative that this team will suck.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    This isn't an either or type of situation ...

    He's clearly in more command of what's going on around him compared to 12 months ago ... you have to be either blind or a massive troll to not realize that.

    That being said, there's plenty of growth that he has to prove on the field and that begins Saturday ...

    You're definitely pressing as of late trying to hang onto the narrative that this team will suck.
    They suck until they don't.
  • mobeymobey Member Posts: 3,254
    edited September 2016
    They have beat three nobodys by a combined score of 141-30 with about 20 of those points given up vs the second and third string.

    To say you can't see improvement is idiotic.

    Browning is 53-74 for 744 with 12 TDs and 1 pick. His avg QBR is 206.4.

    "If" the Huskys actually did show improvement or Browning was improved, what would you be looking for?

    Some of you remind me of a bitter middle aged woman who keeps repeating that all guys are shit because she's been shit on so much.

    You are allowed to be optimistic.

    And btw comparing Peterman to Sark really makes you look clueless.

    LIPO

    (And yes, I know this isn't the 'cool' attitude on this site any longer. But being negative about Sark and Ty and Tits was justified and correct, NOT because being negative was different, but because it was right.)

    Fire away.
  • SweatpantsGeneralSweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,148 Swaye's Wigwam
    What I learned from your article:

    You and @Dennis_DeYoung are fucking.

    You're wrong. Perhaps we should debate this on a future pod?

  • SweatpantsGeneralSweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,148 Swaye's Wigwam

    They suck until they don't.
    I agree with you more than I care to admit. But I'm an analist. Ooops I mispelled that

    Jake is light years ahead of where he was last year. Not even close.

    I'm rewatching the PSU (sorry brother) game right now. I was geting bounced around in a shitty Lewis County motel with my still legally married GF when this was on so I missed some stuff.

    Jake is the real deal. I will bet you 50 Sven bucks we assfuck Arizona. Yes. You heard it here.
  • SweatpantsGeneralSweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,148 Swaye's Wigwam
    Haysus Christo. I just watched that second touchdown he threw to Chico. That was one of the best thrown balls I've ever seen. Fuck off @DerekJohnson and @Dennis_DeYoung eat a dick. You owe me a steak dinner at a restaurant better than the Elbe Bar and Grill when I'm right.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    koopdog said:

    I agree with you more than I care to admit. But I'm an analist. Ooops I mispelled that

    Jake is light years ahead of where he was last year. Not even close.

    I'm rewatching the PSU (sorry brother) game right now. I was geting bounced around in a shitty Lewis County motel with my still legally married GF when this was on so I missed some stuff.

    Jake is the real deal. I will bet you 50 Sven bucks we assfuck Arizona. Yes. You heard it here.
    We? ass fucked Arizona last year.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    mobey said:

    They have beat three nobodys by a combined score of 141-30 with about 20 of those points given up vs the second and third string.

    To say you can't see improvement is idiotic.

    Browning is 53-74 for 744 with 12 TDs and 1 pick. His avg QBR is 206.4.

    "If" the Huskys actually did show improvement or Browning was improved, what would you be looking for?

    Some of you remind me of a bitter middle aged woman who keeps repeating that all guys are shit because she's been shit on so much.

    You are allowed to be optimistic.

    And btw comparing Peterman to Sark really makes you look clueless.

    LIPO

    (And yes, I know this isn't the 'cool' attitude on this site any longer. But being negative about Sark and Ty and Tits was justified and correct, NOT because being negative was different, but because it was right.)

    Fire away.

    8-10
  • SweatpantsGeneralSweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,148 Swaye's Wigwam

    We? ass fucked Arizona last year.
    Just a small adjustment.

    When you say we. Could you exclude yourself Sir? Thanks in advance.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    BearsWiin said:

    If only somebody would create a CrowningBrowning alt handle

    If o ly somebody could photoshop Browning's head peering out from Jen Cohen's vagina.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    No one is calling him a bust you fucking moron.

    And also - you are a fucktarded idiot because stats mean nothing. If you saw Tui play in his true frosh year, you knew he had balls.

    Also - he didn't play his soph year because Brock wasn't hurt like he was in Tui's freshman year.

    GTFO of here with this weak shit.

    Fuck off, die, light yourself on fire and LEAVE. Most of your posts are fucking awful and you're a closet Doog.

    So fuck off and die. This poast should make you Friday sacrifice material.

    Fucking stats over your own fucking eyes. You are a complete fucking idiot.
    Whoa, did he even take a position other than copy pasting? What are you tilting over?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter
    Jake's better, no question, but still just okay for the Pac12. Oregon's Mt. State txfr QB has twice the arm strength as does the Cal QB. Jake can't throw bbs like other P12 QB's can, but his accuracy on the short and mid-range throws is pretty good, and his supporting cast of receivers is way fucking better than last year. WR speed bails him out on the long throws, which is fine since all he really needs to do is hurl it long and Ross or Pettis can adjust and run under it.

    Lack of quality depth at QB makes it Jake or bust, so I'm gonna doog for Jake all season long. If he works hard, learns from his mistakes and avoids too many blind-side hits and takes care of the ball, he'll be fine. UW has won plenty of games with lesser QBs in the past. No reason Jake can't get us to 9-3 or better without working miracles.

    If you disagree with me, you're a fag.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Jake's better, no question, but still just okay for the Pac12. Oregon's Mt. State txfr QB has twice the arm strength as does the Cal QB. Jake can't throw bbs like other P12 QB's can, but his accuracy on the short and mid-range throws is pretty good, and his supporting cast of receivers is way fucking better than last year. WR speed bails him out on the long throws, which is fine since all he really needs to do is hurl it long and Ross or Pettis can adjust and run under it.

    Lack of quality depth at QB makes it Jake or bust, so I'm gonna doog for Jake all season long. If he works hard, learns from his mistakes and avoids too many blind-side hits and takes care of the ball, he'll be fine. UW has won plenty of games with lesser QBs in the past. No reason Jake can't get us to 9-3 or better without working miracles.

    If you disagree with me, you're a fag.

    I don't disagree with you, but I'm a fag anyway. My life is amazing.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter

    I don't disagree with you, but I'm a fag anyway. My life is amazing.
    I'm listening to your pod right now. Weird.

    Wrong kind of fag. I'm talking about the asexual, non-sexual preference type of fag. The kind of fag that gay dudes call "fags." You know the diff.
Sign In or Register to comment.