OK, which one of you bungholes
Quote Originally Posted by FrankBear View Post
Hey guys. Looking forward to a really entertaining game.
No chance Cal is held under 40 points. Sorry. SDSU has a more experienced and disciplined defense than Texas. Cal's offense is actually better than last year as well. Stronger running game and a much better offensive line. Webb is not too far of a drop off of Goff and we finally have some receiver that can get YAC.
The defense is about the same. Worse upfront, but stronger in the secondary.
Texas - 52
Cal - 45
stfu nobody cares. Texas is going to skull fuck Cal.
Texas- 51
Cal- 17
Comments
-
It would be wrong for a five reasons post to appear.
-
Either way though ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:It would be wrong for a five reasons post to appear.
-
1. David Webb - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.
2. Offensive Line - They average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Bazakas, Borrayo, Ossai, Stuckey, Uluave, Williams etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.
3. Kaufman - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Buh and Kaufman, we will see a much improved defense on 9/18.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest Cal team has been in a long time. Zion Echols, Evan Rambo, Noah Beito, Malik Psalms Rusty Becker, Chorizo Nunchuck, Virta Vea etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that they haven't had in past seasons, speed.
5. Time of Possession - I think Cal can dominate the time of possession stat. The more they can shorten the game and keep their defense off of the field, the better chance they have to win the game.
I think Cal wins rather easily, say 34-17? -
-
lmao
-
If I PM you my address, can you please send me some of that good $#@! you're smoking? The only way we win this game is with a huge turnover margin and if our running backs run with their hair on fire.
-
WELL IT'S ABOUT FUCKING TIME
-
Yes, please PM me your address. I will send you many wonderful things
CLENDON, HELP -
btw, they are worse than Stalin over there....
OMG! I'm a new user and I can't post!
That's right. Here's what you need to do:
1. When you signed up here, you put in your email address. We sent an email to your email address asking you to verify your email. Do this. You can't do anything here until you do.
2. Wait one day. New users can't post anything on their first day.
3. After you wait your day, you can post in all forums, except: 1) You cannot start a thread in the Football forum, and 2) You cannot view the NSAA forum.
4. After thirty days, and after you make 50 posts, you are granted access to the NSAA forum.
5. After thirty days, and after you make 100 posts, and after your reputation is greater than 25 points, you are granted the ability to post new threads in the football forum.
-
FagsMad_Son said:btw, they are worse than Stalin over there....
OMG! I'm a new user and I can't post!
That's right. Here's what you need to do:
1. When you signed up here, you put in your email address. We sent an email to your email address asking you to verify your email. Do this. You can't do anything here until you do.
2. Wait one day. New users can't post anything on their first day.
3. After you wait your day, you can post in all forums, except: 1) You cannot start a thread in the Football forum, and 2) You cannot view the NSAA forum.
4. After thirty days, and after you make 50 posts, you are granted access to the NSAA forum.
5. After thirty days, and after you make 100 posts, and after your reputation is greater than 25 points, you are granted the ability to post new threads in the football forum. -
Seriously. To give a point of reference, I need 30 days, 100 posts, and 25 reputation to be able to post new threads. That means I am 29 days, 95 posts, and 479 reputation away from being able to post a new thread.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FagsMad_Son said:btw, they are worse than Stalin over there....
OMG! I'm a new user and I can't post!
That's right. Here's what you need to do:
1. When you signed up here, you put in your email address. We sent an email to your email address asking you to verify your email. Do this. You can't do anything here until you do.
2. Wait one day. New users can't post anything on their first day.
3. After you wait your day, you can post in all forums, except: 1) You cannot start a thread in the Football forum, and 2) You cannot view the NSAA forum.
4. After thirty days, and after you make 50 posts, you are granted access to the NSAA forum.
5. After thirty days, and after you make 100 posts, and after your reputation is greater than 25 points, you are granted the ability to post new threads in the football forum. -
The neggers will get you long before thatMad_Son said:
Seriously. To give a point of reference, I need 30 days, 100 posts, and 25 reputation to be able to post new threads. That means I am 29 days, 95 posts, and 479 reputation away from being able to post a new thread.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FagsMad_Son said:btw, they are worse than Stalin over there....
OMG! I'm a new user and I can't post!
That's right. Here's what you need to do:
1. When you signed up here, you put in your email address. We sent an email to your email address asking you to verify your email. Do this. You can't do anything here until you do.
2. Wait one day. New users can't post anything on their first day.
3. After you wait your day, you can post in all forums, except: 1) You cannot start a thread in the Football forum, and 2) You cannot view the NSAA forum.
4. After thirty days, and after you make 50 posts, you are granted access to the NSAA forum.
5. After thirty days, and after you make 100 posts, and after your reputation is greater than 25 points, you are granted the ability to post new threads in the football forum. -
Need a Tosh Lupoi in there.Mad_Son said:1. David Webb - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.
2. Offensive Line - They average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Bazakas, Borrayo, Ossai, Stuckey, Uluave, Williams etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.
3. Kaufman - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Buh and Kaufman, we will see a much improved defense on 9/18.
4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest Cal team has been in a long time. Zion Echols, Evan Rambo, Noah Beito, Malik Psalms Rusty Becker, Chorizo Nunchuck, Virta Vea etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that they haven't had in past seasons, speed.
5. Time of Possession - I think Cal can dominate the time of possession stat. The more they can shorten the game and keep their defense off of the field, the better chance they have to win the game.
I think Cal wins rather easily, say 34-17? -
jfc try harder $#@!got
-
-8108 reputation
We need a system like that here -
"Your father cheated on your mother with men. Fact. You're the reason they got a divorce. "
It looks like one of them realizes you have two dads... -
lol. I was going to make an oedipus comment but two dads is way better.Hippopeteamus said:"Your father cheated on your mother with men. Fact. You're the reason they got a divorce. "
It looks like one of them realizes you have two dads... -
Keep the oedipus comment but post like you believe it's about a father not a mother lol
-
5.3 secondsGladstone said:Keep the oedipus comment but post like you believe it's about a father not a mother lol
-
Nice work, you're a fucktard now on their reputation rankings!
I also like the guy giving you advice telling you to be more self-deprecating. -
1. Davis Webb wasn't even the QB on the field at Tech. If he's the best player for Cal that say a lot about your team - none of it good.
2. The Cal OL may be big but they can't do their job. Less than 100 yards and 3.7 YPC against a weak SDSU defense. But they can't pass protect either which is why Webb gave up 3 picks and 2 sacks.
3. If the scheme is to give up big yards on the ground to opposing runners, it's working. Hawaii 6.5 YPC. SDSU 7.3 YPC.
4. They're fast but not good. They get to the wrong place quickly though so you've got that going for you.
5. Cal lost the TOP battle badly to SDSU by about 10:00. They did manage to "dominate" TOP against Hawaii by a whole 1:40 though. -
That's actually my title because of how few posts I have. My reputation has made me "Art Acevedo's bottom bitch"Hippopeteamus said:Nice work, you're a fucktard now on their reputation rankings!
I also like the guy giving you advice telling you to be more self-deprecating. -
You fucking AggyMad_Son said:http://www.shaggytexas.com/board/showthread.php/172913-Texas-Versus-Cal-Game-Week-Thread/page21
We'll see where this goes.
-
Yeah it got repetitive. They are really fixated on that. I get how they think that is a killer dig, but most people don't care. They could possibly think I'm an aggy, but if that is the case all they've done to me is advertise how wrong they are. I get the sense they are very sensitive that atm has been better than them for some time and they feel their rightful place has been usurped. Personally, as a Husky fan, I have no sympathy for them.PurpleReign said:
You fucking AggyMad_Son said:http://www.shaggytexas.com/board/showthread.php/172913-Texas-Versus-Cal-Game-Week-Thread/page21
We'll see where this goes. -
They were dooging pretty bad about a win over ND (under its worst statistical DC in history) and some shit no name school. Surprised given that website's reputation.
HH is better. -
Because dooging over Rutgers and Idaho is more justifiable?Gladstone said:They were dooging pretty bad about a win over ND (under its worst statistical DC in history) and some shit no name school. Surprised given that website's reputation.
HH is better. -
lol whoooooosh
-
When did booftimer hack your account?Gladstone said:lol whoooooosh
-
http://www.shaggytexas.com/board/showthread.php/172913-Texas-Versus-Cal-Game-Week-Thread/page25
Ok, back for one last low tweak
