PM to Ozoned

Actually it is, unless your claiming Sanders supporters by and in large shifted to trump...which would be fucktarded.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

doogie said:

'not' what you've been claiming.

Why is some crap socialist from Vermont in that pole?

Because it is the only way that the moron that created this table could make it look like Trump was doing well in any categories. Since the creator did such a shitty job of this, and didn't provide a source, and since it is old.... looks to me like Trump is losing in every category, because every category prefers Clinton or Sanders to Trump. Such as in the highest income bucket, 9% want Trump, while 12% want either Clinton or Sanders.

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

doogie said:

'not' what you've been claiming.

Why is some crap socialist from Vermont in that pole?

Troomps aren't very smart, objectively speaking.

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

doogie said:

'not' what you've been claiming.

Why is some crap socialist from Vermont in that pole?

Troomps aren't very smart, objectively speaking.

When did they start weighting the vote count by IQ?

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

OZONE said:

Here is something more recent, that includes a source which allows readers to dig in further. And shows what I've been saying, that Trump is doing better with the less educated than he is with the more educated. In other words, Clinton's lead is largest with those that finished college.

http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/2-voter-general-election-preferences/7-7-2016-2-30-10-pm-2/

June is still old as fuck.

I thought it was July, but it was all I could find in the 2 minutes I used to look, and at least it doesn't split the Dem ticket between Clinton and Sanders. I doubt there has been a huge change that changes the underlying point. Clinton does better with more educated voters. Trump does better with less educated voters.