Dawgman observation...
Comments
-
Clearly, these faces deserve video content.
-
In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.
-
That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.
-
technically gifted writers are tough to come by thoughDerekJohnson said:That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.
sometimes you gotta settle for a mediawhore snapchat video -
Doogman is terrible. Regardless of what Twitter or FB is driving content wise.
Boreds, access, recruiting, writing, video.....they all fucking suck at Doogman.
Enough said about that. -
-
Fuck I hate the future. At least any future children I may plague the Earth with won't be able to read or write so I will always be able to communicate behind their backs by spelling.DerekJohnson said:In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.
-
Epic Fail. You should have videoed this response.DerekJohnson said:In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.
-
Shaking and about to vomit.MisterEm said:Clearly, these faces deserve video content.
-
You certainly don't prefer to WRITE them.DerekJohnson said:That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.
Badabing. -
When you go on there, sometimes it immediately blasts you with videos. It's annoying and it takes a while to turn them off.
-
They're comingMelloDawg said:
You certainly don't prefer to WRITE them.DerekJohnson said:That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.
Badabing. -
Their video stories also have text.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Yeah, I used to be a subscriber years ago. Every now and then I wander over to see if they have a free story just because I can't doog it up too much. Anyhow -- one of the thing that baffles me is their focus on video content. Don't they understand that people generally want to read when they go to a web site. Seems like their balance is off. How many of us sit on the couch while our wife watches So you think you can dance and want to read websites versus comb through a bunch of videos. Stupid.
-
You're the expert on Doogman shit.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Their video stories also have text.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Yeah, I used to be a subscriber years ago. Every now and then I wander over to see if they have a free story just because I can't doog it up too much. Anyhow -- one of the thing that baffles me is their focus on video content. Don't they understand that people generally want to read when they go to a web site. Seems like their balance is off. How many of us sit on the couch while our wife watches So you think you can dance and want to read websites versus comb through a bunch of videos. Stupid.
-
Eklund was on sideline at game. I think he gained the 100lbs Fetters has lost doing 30/10.
-
Are you saying that there is HHB Premium Video content coming soon?DerekJohnson said:In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.
-
Thanks for watching
-
@yobates , true?steelheader2 said:Eklund was on sideline at game. I think he gained the 100lbs Fetters has lost doing 30/10.
