Dawgman observation...

DoogieMcDoogerson

Yeah, I used to be a subscriber years ago. Every now and then I wander over to see if they have a free story just because I can't doog it up too much. Anyhow -- one of the thing that baffles me is their focus on video content. Don't they understand that people generally want to read when they go to a web site. Seems like their balance is off. How many of us sit on the couch while our wife watches So you think you can dance and want to read websites versus comb through a bunch of videos. Stupid.

MisterEm

Clearly, these faces deserve video content.

DerekJohnson

In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.

DerekJohnson

That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.

LoneStarDawg

DerekJohnson said:

That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.

technically gifted writers are tough to come by though

sometimes you gotta settle for a mediawhore snapchat video

MisterEm

Doogman is terrible. Regardless of what Twitter or FB is driving content wise.

Boreds, access, recruiting, writing, video.....they all fucking suck at Doogman.

Enough said about that.

doogie

MisterEm said:

Clearly, these faces deserve video content.

- Schick Shadel

- 30/10

- 30/10

Mad_Son

DerekJohnson said:

In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.

Fuck I hate the future. At least any future children I may plague the Earth with won't be able to read or write so I will always be able to communicate behind their backs by spelling.

LawDawg1

DerekJohnson said:

In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.

Epic Fail. You should have videoed this response.

AlCzervik

MisterEm said:

Clearly, these faces deserve video content.

Shaking and about to vomit.

MelloDawg

DerekJohnson said:

That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.

You certainly don't prefer to WRITE them.

Badabing.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

When you go on there, sometimes it immediately blasts you with videos. It's annoying and it takes a while to turn them off.

DerekJohnson

MelloDawg said:

DerekJohnson said:

That being said, I prefer to read a well-written article more than watching video commentary.

You certainly don't prefer to WRITE them.

Badabing.

They're coming

Houhusky

MisterEm said:

Clearly, these faces deserve video content.

I thought we were limiting explicit content to @Swaye's wigwam?

puppylove_sugarsteel

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Yeah, I used to be a subscriber years ago. Every now and then I wander over to see if they have a free story just because I can't doog it up too much. Anyhow -- one of the thing that baffles me is their focus on video content. Don't they understand that people generally want to read when they go to a web site. Seems like their balance is off. How many of us sit on the couch while our wife watches So you think you can dance and want to read websites versus comb through a bunch of videos. Stupid.

Their video stories also have text.

ThomasFremont

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Yeah, I used to be a subscriber years ago. Every now and then I wander over to see if they have a free story just because I can't doog it up too much. Anyhow -- one of the thing that baffles me is their focus on video content. Don't they understand that people generally want to read when they go to a web site. Seems like their balance is off. How many of us sit on the couch while our wife watches So you think you can dance and want to read websites versus comb through a bunch of videos. Stupid.

Their video stories also have text.

You're the expert on Doogman shit.

steelheader2

Eklund was on sideline at game. I think he gained the 100lbs Fetters has lost doing 30/10.

H_D

DerekJohnson said:

In their defense, I have heard that Twitter and Facebook are putting a strong emphasis on video content. The consensus is that video is the wave of the future for media. So Dawgman or Scout probably has good reasoning behind any emphasis they may be doing.

Are you saying that there is HHB Premium Video content coming soon?

RaceBannon

Thanks for watching

Baseman

steelheader2 said:

Eklund was on sideline at game. I think he gained the 100lbs Fetters has lost doing 30/10.

@yobates , true?