Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
OFFICIAL Rodent Bowl Thread: Beavers @ Gophers
BennyBeaver
Member Posts: 13,346
Who you got?!
Where my Beavs at?
6PM tonight, Big 10 Network
Beavs -13
Where my Beavs at?
6PM tonight, Big 10 Network
Beavs -13
Tagged:
Comments
-
Has OS ever won a non conference game?
Take the poonts. -
Grow the hell up and learn how point spreads work.
-
IF they can overcome the altitude I like the Beavs in an upset in this one.
ATS that is. -
I don't get B10 Network (not kidding)
I'll be watching "My" Vandals take on Choate's Montana State Bobcats on ESPN3
Again...totally not kidding. -
i just went to get a payday loan, sold a kidney, and sold your wife into a human trafficking ring.BennyBeaver said:
Beavs -13
ill take that bet and take minny. -
I like upside down Warshington in this one.
-
Can't watch, I think Pretty Little Liars might be on Netflix.
-
I get the Big-10 Network but not the Pac-12 Network. Isn't is ironic?
Like a black fly in your Chardonnay -
Well the pac network isn't even showing the game so fuck you and your boyfriend Larry scott
-
Big Ten Network.Pitchfork51 said:Well the pac network isn't even showing the game so fuck you and your boyfriend Larry scott
-
I think Gary Andersen is going to have brain lesion and die at some point this season. The cancer, which still appears to be alive and well, will not win.
-
Minnesota should go for 2 here. You end the game if you get it.
-
Whoosh?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Minnesota should go for 2 here. You end the game if you get it.
-
lol announcers condemning the decision. It's called not respecting your opponent's o you dumb fucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Minnesota should go for 2 here. You end the game if you get it.
-
Jesus Bolden, what the fuck
-
We've broken the seal on the 2016 dreckfest
-
I'd do the same thing to UW in the same situation. What are they going to do, score?Gladstone said:
Whoosh?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Minnesota should go for 2 here. You end the game if you get it.
-
haie said:
I'd do the same thing to UW in the same situation. What are they going to do, score?Gladstone said:
Whoosh?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Minnesota should go for 2 here. You end the game if you get it.
-
yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement -
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9. -
@TheChart true???
-
Clearly you weren't feeling the emotion on the field.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9. -
That's the dumbest thing I've read in ages.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9.
A two score lead is much better than an eight points lead. -
You don't go for two based on what happens if you make it. You go for two based on what happens if you miss it. That's why the coaches up 5 early in the 4th quarter who go for two are idiots.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's the dumbest thing I've read in ages.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9.
A two score lead is much better than an eight points lead. -
That kind of loser mentality is the same kind of loser mentality that punts on 4th and 1 from Oregon's 39 yard line.Alexis said:
You don't go for two based on what happens if you make it. You go for two based on what happens if you miss it. That's why the coaches up 5 early in the 4th quarter who go for two are idiots.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's the dumbest thing I've read in ages.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9.
A two score lead is much better than an eight points lead. -
You go for two based on the flow of the game. Minnesota was starting to exert their will on the OSU defense. If you think you have a greater than 50% chance of converting, you go for two. The only scenario I don't is if your down 6, when an extra point wins it. You even see this in the NFL. How many times did the Steelers go for two last year, even when they didn't have to?Alexis said:
You don't go for two based on what happens if you make it. You go for two based on what happens if you miss it. That's why the coaches up 5 early in the 4th quarter who go for two are idiots.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's the dumbest thing I've read in ages.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9.
A two score lead is much better than an eight points lead. -
You go for 2 because your win probability goes from 90% to 99% if you get it and from 90% to 85% if you miss it.
-
So you would internet tough guy it and go for 2 when up 5 early in the 4th quarter. Got it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That kind of loser mentality is the same kind of loser mentality that punts on 4th and 1 from Oregon's 39 yard line.Alexis said:
You don't go for two based on what happens if you make it. You go for two based on what happens if you miss it. That's why the coaches up 5 early in the 4th quarter who go for two are idiots.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's the dumbest thing I've read in ages.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9.
A two score lead is much better than an eight points lead.
Going for 2 made no sense there either, but was very unlikely to cost them. They went from having to give up 2 scores just to tie (TD and 2 pt conversion) to only having to give up 1 score to tie. True, OSU is dreck and wasn't going to score, but still, stupid. It's a loser mentality just like taking a knee with less than a minute left to run out the clock with a lead in AZ vs. running your sure handed running back take the hand off. Good football management is good football management. -
Alexis said:
So you would internet tough guy it and go for 2 when up 5 early in the 4th quarter. Got it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That kind of loser mentality is the same kind of loser mentality that punts on 4th and 1 from Oregon's 39 yard line.Alexis said:
You don't go for two based on what happens if you make it. You go for two based on what happens if you miss it. That's why the coaches up 5 early in the 4th quarter who go for two are idiots.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's the dumbest thing I've read in ages.FremontTroll said:
No you're entirely correct. That OSU was unlikely to score again doesn't weigh one way or the other.Gladstone said:yeah put it that way and i can't really argue against it
lol @ the idea of browning and his band of pants-shitting losers rallying back
i retract my previous statement
The question is, assuming that by some miracle OSU does score again, whether you'd rather have your 'O' try a 2 pointer to win/tie if they fail
OR
your opponent try a 2 to tie/lose if they fail.
Obviously given the dreck fest offenses involved you'd rather be up the guaranteed 8 than 7/9.
The 8 is worth more than the 9.
A two score lead is much better than an eight points lead.
Going for 2 made no sense there either, but was very unlikely to cost them. They went from having to give up 2 scores just to tie (TD and 2 pt conversion) to only having to give up 1 score to tie. True, OSU is dreck and wasn't going to score, but still, stupid. It's a loser mentality just like taking a knee with less than a minute left to run out the clock with a lead in AZ vs. running your sure handed running back take the hand off. Good football management is good football management.
obligatory -
rodmansrage said:
i just went to get a payday loan, sold a kidney, and sold your wife into a human trafficking ring.BennyBeaver said:
Beavs -13
ill take that bet and take minny.
She was worth the $12.00 I paid for her.
