Rate coaches since James
1. Neuiheisel
2. Sarkisian
3. Petersen
4. Lambright
5. Gilbertson
6. Willingham
People overrate Lambright because his overall record wasn't bad. What they forget is that he inherited the conference's best program from Don James. And turned it into a 6-5 program with terrifying rapidity.
And yes pretty much all the coaches not named Neuiheisel have sucked and have been garbage. Petersen obviously can move up the list but I'm not feeling inspired by the consecutive 6 loss seasons to open his tenure. Especially given how awful the OOC scuedules the last 2 years have been.
Comments
-
Tui?
-
1. Rick
everyone else sucks
2. Lambo. For Whammy in Miami alone. Sucks dick though.
3. Sark (5-4 > 4-5, obviously inherited worse situation than Petersen despite what plss says lol)
4. Petersen. Won nothing of consequence.
5. Gilby. Still lol @ the 12-0 doogman prediction.
6. Chauncey
-
I still can't figure out why Neuiheisel was such a bad coach at UCLA. Especially since he had Norm Chow as OC.
-
I wish Skippy had stayed a year or two more at Montlake so you would see for yourselves what a shit coach he really was/is.
-
WARBTPOBearsWiin said:I wish Skippy had stayed a year or two more at Montlake so you would see for yourselves what a shit coach he really was/is.
-
Scoreboard babyBearsWiin said:I wish Skippy had stayed a year or two more at Montlake so you would see for yourselves what a shit coach he really was/is.
-
I think Petersen is better than Sark. I think.
They both fucking suck, though. -
Why, oh why would you want to spend time on this?Huskiepack said:I say
1. Neuiheisel
2. Sarkisian
3. Petersen
4. Lambright
5. Gilbertson
6. Willingham
People overrate Lambright because his overall record wasn't bad. What they forget is that he inherited the conference's best program from Don James. And turned it into a 6-5 program with terrifying rapidity.
And yes pretty much all the coaches not named Neuiheisel have sucked and have been garbage. Petersen obviously can move up the list but I'm not feeling inspired by the consecutive 6 loss seasons to open his tenure. Especially given how awful the OOC scuedules the last 2 years have been. -
JaWarrenJaHooker said:
I think Petersen is better than Sark. I think.
They both fucking suck, though.
It's proven than both Petersen and Sarkisian can have a whole bunch of 7-6 seasons. However it's not proven that Petersen can take a program from 0-12 to 7-6. That's why I'm rating Sark higher even though they both are awful.
Petersen does have time to prove he doesn't suck. But as of right now he sucks.
-
Sounds good bro!
