Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Presented w/o comment.....

«1

Comments

  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    You must be a Premium Member to access this content

    Sign up to access all premium content & benefits – It’s the best way to stay up-to-date with your team.
  • Peterman
    Peterman Member Posts: 675
    That thread has AIDS
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Peterman said:

    That thread has AIDS

    When jsmdogs has to attempt to be the voice of reason, you may have some problems.
  • PurpleReign
    PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,479
    You must be a Premium Member to access this content
    Sign up to access all premium content & benefits – It’s the best way to stay up-to-date with your team.
    SIGN UP FOR PREMIUM
    No, thanks. Please tell me about signing up for free
    PREMIUM MEMBERSHIP
    Benefits
    All Basic Membership Benefits
    Exclusive Recruiting, Player and Game stories
    Access to Premium stories across the Scout Network
    Ad-free Scout videos for Annual Members
    Exclusive Premium Forums
    Premium Fantasy “Cheat Sheet” content and advice
    10% off All Tickets – Save $100’s
    Already a member?
    Sign in
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited August 2016

    Great Your access to this site's forums has been revoked as always.

    If someone taught me how to Screenshart from Windows 95, I could post it.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club


    Auburndawg
    Auburndawg's Pre-Camp PAC-12 Power Rankings!
    Yesterday at 9:26 AM
    Welcome to another great year of college football!
    These rankings are based on what we know today about each of these teams. Things can change dramatically based on developments, such as injuries, during training camp, and then again when we see all the new players, particularly all the new QBs around the league, actually play a game.
    A definite talent gap has developed in recent years in the PAC-12. The LA schools, Stanford, Oregon, UW, and lately ASU. recruit at a consistently higher level than the other five teams.

    1. USC. Yes, they have rookie a QB and have to replace about half the defense. But everyone other than the QB is back on offense. All that 5 star talent, and now they may finally have a competent coach.
    2. Washington. Dawgs have fewer question marks than any of the other upper division programs. Virtually the entire defense is back, and the D will be dominant. The problem last year was too many rookies on offense. Time has solved that problem, as experienced players return at every position. And we get John Ross back. Jake Browning 2016 will be a major upgrade over Jake Browning 2015. And in year three this is 100% a Chris Petersen team, which is a very good thing.
    3. UCLA. The Bruins return most of their defense, and their QB. But they lose most of their O-line and receivers. Based having a returning QB, and strong overall talent, I start them out just ahead of Oregon and Stanford.
    4. Stanford. I understand the respect for Stanford's program, but they lose just about their entire offense, other than McCaffrey, and half their defense. With that number of question marks you have to assume they take at least one step back this year.
    5. Oregon. The only thing that kept Oregon from being mediocre last year was Vernon Adams. He is gone, and so is their entire defensive front 7. Yes, there is a lot of talent in this program, but just like Stanford, you have to assume they fall back a bit.


    6. WSU. Cougs lose a few key guys on defense, but other than that they have few question marks. They will be dangerous as long as Falk stays healthy. Will he make it to the Apple Cup this year?
    7. Arizona. This team returns their QB and virtually everyone else, other than Scooby Wright.
    8. ASU. New QB. New offensive line. New D coordinator. 6 new starters on defense. ASU takes a step back.
    9. Utah. New QB. No Devontae Booker. Utes are well coached, but that only goes so far.
    10. Cal. No Goff. All the WRs are gone.

    11. Colorado
    12. Oregon State.

  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Waiting for his (her?) Colorado and OSU analysis.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    TheGlove said:

    Waiting for his (her?) Colorado and OSU analysis.

    They suck
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    This football team does not suck
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098

    This football team does not suck

    For @TierbsHsotBoobs until proven otherwise:
    image
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Baseman said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    I'm still going to believe that sark's stinch still resides on this team for another year at least. Guys he recruited went there for a reason and just don't quit partying and being jackass's.

    I'll believe the normal usc bullshit when they actually do something
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Baseman said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    What an awful conference. Fuck me.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Baseman said:

    Baseman said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Because we're 8 and 18?
  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623

    Because we're 8 and 18?

    You act like @Owen12 didn't happen.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Baseman said:

    Baseman said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Baseman said:

    Baseman said:

    Baseman said:

    This football team does not suck

    Wrong on all except Stanford.
    They suck too
    Shit arguement Boobs.

    going into 2015, Stanford had .792 WP against ranked opponents and proceeded to go 5-1 against ranked opponents in '15, running their record against the same to 24-6 (80%)

    That's an elite fucking squad - so lick my love pump.

    Post 2014: How Pac-12 teams have fared against ranked teams since 2009, according to StatsPass.com.

    1. Stanford: 19-5, .792
    2. Oregon: 17-7, .708
    3. USC: 7-10, .412
    4. UCLA: 8-14, .364
    5. Washington: 8-18, .308
    6. Arizona State: 5-13, .278
    7. Arizona: 4-12, .250
    8. Utah: 3-10, .231
    9. Oregon State: 5-17. .227
    10. California: 3-17, .150
    11. Colorado: 1-15, .063
    12. Washington State: 1-19, .053
    They scored SIX FUCKING POINTS at Northwestern last year and lost to Helfrich at home.


    image
    (NT)

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/2/29/11125594/ncaa-football-best-teams-decades-history-alabama-fsu-nebraska-oklahoma-michigan

    Playing Pac-12 retards helps.

    Wake me when Stanford makes the CFP. Until then, losers lose.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Boobs hates facts


    See the Tug
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Boobs hates facts

    See the Tug

    I openly admit that Stanford is a dwarf among midgets.

    NDSU is the best team this decade if quality of opponent doesn't matter.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369

    Boobs hates facts

    See the Tug

    I openly admit that Stanford is a dwarf among midgets.

    NDSU is the best team this decade if quality of opponent doesn't matter.
    When it takes multiple poasts to explain your shit arguement you're a shit poaster.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    I wonder if boobs knows how dumb he looks and just goes with it or he's oblivious