Wasserman Schultz resigns, joins the Clinton campaign hours later
Comments
-
dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
You don't even know the definition of fascism.
The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
-
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.PostGameOrangeSlices said:dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
You don't even know the definition of fascism.
The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years? -
Clearly Trump has not killed millions of people.Sledog said:
I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.
But you did not find his RNC acceptance speech to be a tad dictatorial/authoritarian? Cause I sure did. -
2001400ex said:
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.PostGameOrangeSlices said:dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
You don't even know the definition of fascism.
The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?
What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk -
You know what fascism means about as well as you know what socialism and communism means.Sledog said:
I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.
Used to think all this one world shit was just that shit. That was in the 80's, early 90's but here we are!
FYI we need a reset on the court it's loaded with justices openly hostile towards the constitution. -
Obama doesn't fit that profile, but still.PostGameOrangeSlices said:2001400ex said:
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.PostGameOrangeSlices said:dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
You don't even know the definition of fascism.
The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?
What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk -
-
Clinton and Democrats are afraid of war. Where have you been the last 50 years? Syria or some shit?PostGameOrangeSlices said:2001400ex said:
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.PostGameOrangeSlices said:dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
You don't even know the definition of fascism.
The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?
What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk -
You clearly have no clue what facism means.Sledog said:
I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.
Used to think all this one world shit was just that shit. That was in the 80's, early 90's but here we are!
FYI we need a reset on the court it's loaded with justices openly hostile towards the constitution.
-
I don't know about you, but attacking the freedom of the press through civil lawsuits sounds pretty authoritarian to mePostGameOrangeSlices said:dhdawg said:
I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutanallpurpleallgold said:
Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.dhdawg said:I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism
You don't even know the definition of fascism.
The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
