Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Wasserman Schultz resigns, joins the Clinton campaign hours later

13

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,564 Swaye's Wigwam
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,616 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan
    I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.

    To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.
    Clearly Trump has not killed millions of people.

    But you did not find his RNC acceptance speech to be a tad dictatorial/authoritarian? Cause I sure did.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,564 Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?

    What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan
    I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.

    To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.

    Used to think all this one world shit was just that shit. That was in the 80's, early 90's but here we are!

    FYI we need a reset on the court it's loaded with justices openly hostile towards the constitution.

    You know what fascism means about as well as you know what socialism and communism means.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?

    What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk
    Obama doesn't fit that profile, but still.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?

    What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk
    Clinton and Democrats are afraid of war. Where have you been the last 50 years? Syria or some shit?
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan
    I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.

    To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.

    Used to think all this one world shit was just that shit. That was in the 80's, early 90's but here we are!

    FYI we need a reset on the court it's loaded with justices openly hostile towards the constitution.

    You clearly have no clue what facism means.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    I don't know about you, but attacking the freedom of the press through civil lawsuits sounds pretty authoritarian to me
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?

    What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk
    HRYK
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,564 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2016


    If you get slandered with false information you have a right to sue someone
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,660 Founders Club



    If you get slandered with false information you have a right to sue someone

    Exactly. Calling ballbag a stupid fucking fag is allowed. Because its true
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,893 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan
    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    I don't know about you, but attacking the freedom of the press through civil lawsuits sounds pretty authoritarian to me
    Filing a lawsuit is "authoritarian?" Christ.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,240 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2016

    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?

    What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk
    Obama doesn't fit that profile, but still.
    He's got a pen and a phone and doesn't need Congress. Sounds like a despot dictator asshat to me.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,240 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan
    I'm trying to figure out where this fascist label comes from other than the Hillary camp. Fascism is not about capitalism, individual effort and success. Fascists are socialists who are in fact communists who have in fact murdered over 100 million people. None of this applies to Trump and I'm not a big Trump fan.

    To imply that because a man running for president will actually enforce the fucking laws we have on the books is somehow fascist is lunacy. But so is the democratic (code word for progressocommiesocialfascist) party.

    Used to think all this one world shit was just that shit. That was in the 80's, early 90's but here we are!

    FYI we need a reset on the court it's loaded with justices openly hostile towards the constitution.

    You clearly have no clue what facism means.
    No clearly the idiots calling Trump fascist have no idea what it means.
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279



    If you get slandered with false information you have a right to sue someone

    Exactly. Calling RaceBannon a failed real estate investor turned carpet layer is allowed. Because its true
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    I am probably gonna end up voting hill, only for the mere fact that trump justices would ruin this country or set it back for maybe a generation, but she is the worst democratic candidate ever to appear on my ballot, by a mile. and no, it's not because of fucking sexism

    Grow a pair and vote Trump. Worst case, we get to watch the world burn.
    I'm either gonna vote lesser of two evils or on principle. And neither of those scenarios end up with a vote for a fascist orange orangutan

    You don't even know the definition of fascism.

    The "tolerant" left is way more fascist than Trump could ever be
    Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.

    What part of the doesn't sound like the Republican party the last 35 years?

    What part of that doesn't sound like the Democrat party of the last 50? Clinton is a warhawk
    Obama doesn't fit that profile, but still.
    He's got a pen and a phone and doesn't need Congress. Sounds like a despot dictator asshat to me.
    Have you read Trump's quotes on executive orders? Holy fuck you are dumb.
Sign In or Register to comment.