Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Chris Petersen has reshaped the identity of Washington football
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,209 
Comments
-
5-4 to 4-5
-
You know why you deserve to be flagged.DerekJohnson said: -
No disrespect for the esteemed Race Bannon or any of you other fucktards... but what would be acceptable for 2016? I know a championship is the official marker (duh) .... short of that is 10-2 (7-2 in conference) with a subsequent Holiday or Alamo Bowl win to finish 11-2 adequate? Taking into consideration the loser mentality is fading... with sights on achieving more in 2017?RaceBannon said:5-4 to 4-5
Or is it natty or bust...?
My personal prediction is 9-3 (6-3) followed by a bowl win to finish 10-3. I can live with that because it should only continue upward. But maybe I am a fool....
-
Any loss should result in a firing at the 50 yard line.
HTH -
-
Natty? wtf?... Let's just try winning our six team division, first.Wombat_Guernica said:
No disrespect for the esteemed Race Bannon or any of you other fucktards... but what would be acceptable for 2016? I know a championship is the official marker (duh) .... short of that is 10-2 (7-2 in conference) with a subsequent Holiday or Alamo Bowl win to finish 11-2 adequate? Taking into consideration the loser mentality is fading... with sights on achieving more in 2017?RaceBannon said:5-4 to 4-5
Or is it natty or bust...?
My personal prediction is 9-3 (6-3) followed by a bowl win to finish 10-3. I can live with that because it should only continue upward. But maybe I am a fool.... -
9-3 means we? won every game we? were supposed to and lost to every decent, ranked team we play: Oregon, Stanford, USC. I can't see how that outcome could be seen as a successful year. Min 10 dubyas, 2 losses.Wombat_Guernica said:
No disrespect for the esteemed Race Bannon or any of you other fucktards... but what would be acceptable for 2016? I know a championship is the official marker (duh) .... short of that is 10-2 (7-2 in conference) with a subsequent Holiday or Alamo Bowl win to finish 11-2 adequate? Taking into consideration the loser mentality is fading... with sights on achieving more in 2017?RaceBannon said:5-4 to 4-5
Or is it natty or bust...?
My personal prediction is 9-3 (6-3) followed by a bowl win to finish 10-3. I can live with that because it should only continue upward. But maybe I am a fool.... -
9-3 would be a major disappointment with this pansy schedule
-
If we lose to Stanford the season is over before October 1
-
I think 10-2 is where we land... at that point Tedford will have been elevated to head coach.ThomasFremont said:Any loss should result in a firing at the 50 yard line.
HTH
