Question for the Sark is a great recruiter crowd
Comments
-
Stan Empterman was a 2 star.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
-
CHRIST!HeretoBeatmyChest said:From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
Plus a bulk of those 4-5 star recruits on the line have all busted like Kohler, Hatchie, Potoe, etc. -
Yep Time. Exactly my thought. Take away the 2010 class and OL recruiting has been a dreck fest- and thats no hyperbole.
-
Ding ding ding. We have a fucking winner.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
Don't post this common sense over on Doogman though. Kim will have a Mexico beach's amount of sand in his cunt and Ektard will tell you that Sark is trying REALLY, REALLY hard to get linemen. -
Oh its poasted alright. And the Sark supporters came en masse to support their "great recruiter and best play caller in America" who offers 20+ lineman a year. Ektard's silence in the thread after that poast speaks volumes.CheersWestDawg said:
Ding ding ding. We have a fucking winner.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
Don't post this common sense over on Doogman though. Kim will have a Mexico beach's amount of sand in his cunt and Ektard will tell you that Sark is trying REALLY, REALLY hard to get linemen.
Who the fuck rates their closing success on 'offers'? The doogiest of doogs or just shitty salesmen? I am not in sales but I will go out on a limb and say that sales managers could give a flying f how many offers their staff makes- its about closing. Shart is not a closer. Period.
-
Always.MisterEm said:
Oh its poasted alright. And the Sark supporters came en masse to support their "great recruiter and best play caller in America" who offers 20+ lineman a year. Ektard's silence in the thread after that poast speaks volumes.CheersWestDawg said:
Ding ding ding. We have a fucking winner.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
Don't post this common sense over on Doogman though. Kim will have a Mexico beach's amount of sand in his cunt and Ektard will tell you that Sark is trying REALLY, REALLY hard to get linemen.
Who the fuck rates their closing success on 'offers'? The doogiest of doogs or just shitty salesmen? I am not in sales but I will go out on a limb and say that sales managers could give a flying f how many offers their staff makes- its about closing. Shart is not a closer. Period.
Be.
Closing. -
No coffee for Sark. Coffee is for closers.
-
The worst part is there are still fucktards at doogman who ignore this and say if we had Mariota instead of Price we would have won. Oregon may have slightly better skill guys, but ours are very good. You can fucking win with those guys. Mariota is significantly better than Price, but once again, you can win with Price. He's a good QB. If we switched DL's with Oregon, Price would have all day to throw and pick apart defenses, and Mariota would look a lot worse.HeretoBeatmyChest said:From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
The difference is Oregon has stocked up on the lines. They have talent and depth at the most important spots. Their DL does not get tired, they have back ups who are talented players. An injury or two doesn't derail them like it would do us. Year after year, we never fix the issue. How can we complain though, Sark offers more lineman than any other position. He's trying really hard guys.
-
The illusion of Sark's great recruiting died years ago. I don't see many people spouting that and can't understand why some of you still cling to it either. He has found a fair number of really good players, but has only been decent in terms of rankings and below average in terms of numbers and quality at the most important positions.
-
Damn. Never seen it put to numbers like that, but how can you argue? It's the same thing we've complained about, which is that the classes have always looked good on the surface, but realistically most of the stars are skill guys. These are the same guys UW got back when Rick was here. Same general type of player.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
