Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Question for the Sark is a great recruiter crowd
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 11,453
So I've heard for years how Sark is a great recruiter everyone says so blah blah blah.
So why is Oregon still boat racing UW in Sark's 5th year? I keep hearing Doogs say "Look we just aren't on their level yet. We are getting there but they are just on another level".
Why is that? I mean Sark has been here for five years. I could maybe buy that excuse in year two but not in year five. These are all his guys other than Price.
So either Sark isn't a great recruiter like everyone claims or he is shitty at developing talent. It's one or the other.
BTW not that scout rankings are the be all end all but here it goes.
2010:
Oregon- 13
UW- 11
2011:
Oregon- 13
UW- 22
2012:
Oregon- 15
UW- 23
2013:
Oregon- 17
UW- 13
So Oregon has slightly out recruited UW but it's not a huge margin. I know why our media won't ask this question but it's frustrating why they don't bring up how lack of player development is a huge problem at Washington.
Josh Shirley is basically a non factor this year as a junior. ASJ and Kasen aren't these 5 star studs like we thought we were getting. There isn't one OL in year five that you can say without a doubt this guy is going to play on Sunday's.
It just pisses me off these fucks accept that "Oh well, Oregon is more talented than we are" while not asking why is that in year five?!!
So why is Oregon still boat racing UW in Sark's 5th year? I keep hearing Doogs say "Look we just aren't on their level yet. We are getting there but they are just on another level".
Why is that? I mean Sark has been here for five years. I could maybe buy that excuse in year two but not in year five. These are all his guys other than Price.
So either Sark isn't a great recruiter like everyone claims or he is shitty at developing talent. It's one or the other.
BTW not that scout rankings are the be all end all but here it goes.
2010:
Oregon- 13
UW- 11
2011:
Oregon- 13
UW- 22
2012:
Oregon- 15
UW- 23
2013:
Oregon- 17
UW- 13
So Oregon has slightly out recruited UW but it's not a huge margin. I know why our media won't ask this question but it's frustrating why they don't bring up how lack of player development is a huge problem at Washington.
Josh Shirley is basically a non factor this year as a junior. ASJ and Kasen aren't these 5 star studs like we thought we were getting. There isn't one OL in year five that you can say without a doubt this guy is going to play on Sunday's.
It just pisses me off these fucks accept that "Oh well, Oregon is more talented than we are" while not asking why is that in year five?!!
Comments
-
Oregon recruits what fits their system, while UW recruits scouting stars. There's the difference.
-
Oregon's top recruit involve lineman, that's the difference
-
Then he's shitty at developing talent. Either way it's year five so he's either not this "great" recruiter that Doogs say he is or he sucks at player development.greenblood said:Oregon recruits what fits their system, while UW recruits scouting stars. There's the difference.
This topic is NEVER fucking addressed though ever. Bring it up with Doogs and they dodge this topic all together or give some bullshit how the talent is there then name drop all our skill players while not realizing not one lineman is NFL besides Danny Shelton. -
Then he's shitty at developing talent (AND evaluating talent - see Mariotta)
-
There has been no offensive or defensive identity. Without that, it makes it hard to recruit the right talent.
-
You act like 0-12 never happened.
-
In his five years he'll have had only one OL drafted to the NFL and that was a Ty recruit. That is fucking pathetic!
-
linemen, player development, and discipline
As much as I pray for Autism Stadium to be bombed, ever since that Boise State game, Oregon has been a f****** machine. Only Ohio St, Auburn, Stanford, LSU, And a couple others tripped them up. They never blow games to inferior opponents. They never beat themselves. It's like the Patriots of cfb. -
Parents of autistic children and big time terrorists read this bored. Clean it up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:linemen, player development, and discipline
As much as I pray for Autism Stadium to be bombed, ever since that Boise State game, Oregon has been a f****** machine. Only Ohio St, Auburn, Stanford, LSU, And a couple others tripped them up. They never blow games to inferior opponents. They never beat themselves. It's like the Patriots of cfb. -
From a guy on Dawgman who I think posts here:
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
