I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything. - Do we have ANY receivers as good as Gabe Marks???- Is the two deep roster filled with 4th and 5th year players?uh huh.
I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.
I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything. Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Holt has been neutered and Wilcox is in line to take over
I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything. Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take over
People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we Jen could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith
People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith
Lots of pressing ...He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year.
Lots of pressing ...He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year. In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories.
Lots of pressing ...He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year. In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories. Distraction?Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on? And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post
Lots of pressing ...He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year. In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories. Distraction?Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on? And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post Doogs forget that Peterman could have let him go for nothing instead:http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/contract-extensions-announced-for-huskies-assistant-coaches/
Lots of pressing ...He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year. In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories. Distraction?Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on? And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post Doogs forget that Peterman could have let him go for nothing instead:http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/contract-extensions-announced-for-huskies-assistant-coaches/ There's a reason he's being kept on for only one year ... making a mountain out of a mole hill on this ... it's FS
Lots of pressing ...He's been marginalized this year ... pretty clear to see.I'd be beyond shocked if he's on the staff next year. In the meantime UW wastes $440,000 plus the cost of benefits; fosters a distraction for the team, and gives the media fodder for stories. Distraction?Do you really think that the team doesn't know what is going on? And if UW fired Smith (as I'm sure you'd be advocating), they'd be paying him $440k anyway BECAUSE HE HAS A CONTRACT!!!This is a @PurpleJ FS caliber post Doogs forget that Peterman could have let him go for nothing instead:http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/contract-extensions-announced-for-huskies-assistant-coaches/ There's a reason he's being kept on for only one year ... making a mountain out of a mole hill on this ... it's FS Beyond Tedford being hired as a QC coach, what is your source for all of this talk about Jonathan SmithFS being neutered and Tedford taking over? Or is it just supposition? You state it so matter-of-factly that I think I missed some news or press about this.
