Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?
Comments
-
Yessarktastic said:
- Do we have ANY receivers as good as Gabe Marks???chuck said:I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.
A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.
I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.
Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.
- Is the two deep roster filled with 4th and 5th year players?
uh huh.
-
Yes
Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take overGladstone said:chuck said:I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.
A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.
I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.
Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.
-
No
FTFYTequilla said:
Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Holt has been neutered and Wilcox is in line to take overGladstone said:chuck said:I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.
A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.
I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.
Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.
-
No
Doog supposition.Tequilla said:
Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take overGladstone said:chuck said:I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.
A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.
I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.
Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.
Also Tedford was a mediocre playcaller after 2010. Hardly the stuff of legend or worthy of hyping ourselves over. -
YesPeople asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.
I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith -
YesThe whole Holt for Wilcox is comical because the build out of the defense started under Wilcox and has been taken to a new level by K/Lake ...
The problem was Sark first and foremost ... -
YesTequilla said:
People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.
I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best thatweJen could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith -
Why is Smith still on staff if he's a non factor?Tequilla said:People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.
I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith -
YesHe has a family. C'mon, man.
-
No
A REAL head coach would have fired Smith already.Tequilla said:
Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take overGladstone said:chuck said:I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.
A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.
I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.
Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.





