Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?

11819212324

Comments

  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098
    Yes

    chuck said:

    I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.

    A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.

    I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.

    Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.

    - Do we have ANY receivers as good as Gabe Marks???

    - Is the two deep roster filled with 4th and 5th year players?

    uh huh.
    image
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,231
    Yes
    Gladstone said:

    chuck said:

    I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.

    A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.

    I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.

    Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.

    image
    Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take over
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    No
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    chuck said:

    I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.

    A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.

    I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.

    Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.

    image
    Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take over
    Doog supposition.

    Also Tedford was a mediocre playcaller after 2010. Hardly the stuff of legend or worthy of hyping ourselves over.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,231
    Yes
    People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.

    I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,231
    Yes
    The whole Holt for Wilcox is comical because the build out of the defense started under Wilcox and has been taken to a new level by K/Lake ...

    The problem was Sark first and foremost ...
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Yes
    Tequilla said:

    People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.

    I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we Jen could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith

  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379
    Tequilla said:

    People asked for a more experienced play caller and Smith to be a non factor ... your wish has been granted.

    I'm fine with people criticizing whether Tedford is the best that we could do ... but hard to argue that he isn't better than Smith

    Why is Smith still on staff if he's a non factor?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Yes
    He has a family. C'mon, man.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    No
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    chuck said:

    I don't know why but I tried to read this whole dumb ass thread. Fuck me what a bunch of idiots *we* are here.

    A vote of "yes", I think Pete is the guy is not a vote of support for him or the program. It's not support of anything. It's just a fucking prediction.

    I just think *we* are there. The player development, roster development, and attitude (ready to rumble) all look like they're where they need to be. *We* have a shitload of good players...more than enough to win the Pac 12. There isn't a position group (outside of WR which is the least critical) that doesn't have quality, depth and experience. Every position group has players (even WR has Ross) that could go anywhere in the country and be standouts. UW's roster has been full of holes since the 90s due to bad recruiting, bad roster management, and bad player development but it's finally not the case.

    Petersen has put together a team that can win. All that has to happen is good game day coaching. I voted yes because I think that's the easiest part and I think they'll probably get it right this year (or at least right enough). UW is going to win the north and at least be in the playoff conversation, which would mean I'm right for a change and Petersen is the guy. That's my prediction. It's not a statement of support. I'm not supporting anything.

    image
    Why is it so hard for so many to realize that Smith has been neutered and Tedford is in line to take over
    A REAL head coach would have fired Smith already.