Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
So you are saying the established are backing the establishment candidate?
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him. So why were Democratic primary numbers down?
there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him. So why were Democratic primary numbers down? Smart democrats voted republican in the primaries. And they didn't vote for the fucking moron Trump.
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him. So why were Democratic primary numbers down? I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him. So why were Democratic primary numbers down? I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers. So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.Arf....arf...
there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump Who published these estimates you refer to?
there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump Who published these estimates you refer to? One of many...http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him. So why were Democratic primary numbers down? I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers. So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.Arf....arf... I didn't realize you were this stupid.Not that I bothered paying attention to you before.The math depends on the methodology, and what is and isn't included in the denominator and numerator for the equation.You might learn that if you ever make it to college. But you sound like a typical blue collar Trump support. Dropped out in the 9th grade?
there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump Who published these estimates you refer to? One of many...http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows Welome to January. A lot has changed.
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from? Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him. So why were Democratic primary numbers down? I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.This piece sheds some light on turnout http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/08/so-far-turnout-in-this-years-primaries-rivals-2008-record/
