Official HardcoreHusky Power Rankings for Week 7
2. UCLA
-- probably dreck --
3. Oregon State
4. Stanford
5. ASU
6. Utah
7. Washington
-- fucking dreckfest --
8. WSU
9. USC
10. Arizona
9,000,001. Colorado
9,000,000,000,001 Cal
Comments
-
last year at this point we were considered the 8-10th best team in the conference #incrementalprogress
-
Why do you love Cal so much? Fucking Boog!!!
-
They kept UCLA under 45.greenblood said:Why do you love Cal so much? You still have them rated 3m-4m spots too high.
The toilet #freshbowl in Boulder on 11/16 is going to be special. -
If you would have said when Sark was hired that in 5 years he'd have a better team than USC we all would have taken it.
-
LOLTheKobeStopper said:If you would have said when Sark was hired that in 5 years he'd have a better team than USC we all would have taken it.
If you would have said then that USC would fire Kiffin despite having a significantly better record than Sark and Sark's seat would not even be warm, I would have gouged my own eyes out with the butt end of a hockey stick.
-
-
You know that Goff would drop a quatre cent spot on the Huskies miserable corners, right?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1. Oregon
2. UCLA
-- probably dreck --
3. Oregon State
4. Stanford
5. ASU
6. Utah
7. Washington
-- fucking dreckfest --
8. WSU
9. USC
10. Arizona
9,000,001. Colorado
9,000,000,000,001 Cal -
Oregon torched the Huskies today but the Huskies secondary is far from "horrible".doogsinparadise said:You know that Goff would drop a quatre cent spot on the Huskies miserable corners, right?
TierbsHsotBoobs said:1. Oregon
2. UCLA
-- probably dreck --
3. Oregon State
4. Stanford
5. ASU
6. Utah
7. Washington
-- fucking dreckfest --
8. WSU
9. USC
10. Arizona
9,000,001. Colorado
9,000,000,000,001 Cal
I think the secondary is actually pretty good despite their terrible performance today. -
They're alright, but get burned when it counts. Of course Addison should be at least 2nd team all pac, but what he, Huff, and Montgomery did last week is exactly what good receivers do to mediocre secondaries. That's what standards are: good receivers beat bad and mediocre dbs, and bad to mediocre receivers do not (Boise/Illinois/Arizona/everyone else at Stanford). Not looking forward to the ASU/OSU/WSU games, could get ugly dudeHe_Needs_More_Time said:
Oregon torched the Huskies today but the Huskies secondary is far from "horrible".doogsinparadise said:You know that Goff would drop a quatre cent spot on the Huskies miserable corners, right?
TierbsHsotBoobs said:1. Oregon
2. UCLA
-- probably dreck --
3. Oregon State
4. Stanford
5. ASU
6. Utah
7. Washington
-- fucking dreckfest --
8. WSU
9. USC
10. Arizona
9,000,001. Colorado
9,000,000,000,001 Cal
I think the secondary is actually pretty good despite their terrible performance today. -
Stanford threw for 100 yards last week.doogsinparadise said:They're alright, but get burned when it counts. Of course Addison should be at least 2nd team all pac, but what he, Huff, and Montgomery did last week is exactly what good receivers do to mediocre secondaries. That's what standards are: good receivers beat bad and mediocre dbs, and bad to mediocre receivers do not (Boise/Illinois/Arizona/everyone else at Stanford). Not looking forward to the ASU/OSU/WSU games, could get ugly dude
He_Needs_More_Time said:
Oregon torched the Huskies today but the Huskies secondary is far from "horrible".doogsinparadise said:You know that Goff would drop a quatre cent spot on the Huskies miserable corners, right?
TierbsHsotBoobs said:1. Oregon
2. UCLA
-- probably dreck --
3. Oregon State
4. Stanford
5. ASU
6. Utah
7. Washington
-- fucking dreckfest --
8. WSU
9. USC
10. Arizona
9,000,001. Colorado
9,000,000,000,001 Cal
I think the secondary is actually pretty good despite their terrible performance today.
This is not a mediocre secondary. The fact it took until game 6 (against the best team in the nation) for the lack of a pass rush to be exploited is proof of that.
UW's corners are probably top 3 in the conference.




