Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
More Republicans are getting on the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump bandwagon
OZONE
Member Posts: 2,510
in Tug Tavern
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/02/politics/republican-women-organize-to-support-clinton/index.html
When is the last time so many visible members of one party supported the candidate from the other party?
Comments
-
Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
-
So you are saying the established are backing the establishment candidate?
Not surprising -
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
-
It is a bit more profound.Tequilla said:So you are saying the established are backing the establishment candidate?
They are backing the candidate from the OTHER party. -
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
-
I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
This piece sheds some light on turnout http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/08/so-far-turnout-in-this-years-primaries-rivals-2008-record/
-
OZONE...the Clinton lapdog...there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump, and you and CNN are worried about these 5 ladies. Love this part as well...
Her temporary transition to Democratic volunteer might seem all too convenient at first: She was recently married to Tim Lim, the founder of a media buying firm called Precision and a partner at Bully Pulpit Interactive, which has a contract with the Clinton campaign. -
Smart democrats voted republican in the primaries. And they didn't vote for the fucking moron Trump.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
-
Who published these estimates you refer to?HoustonHusky said:there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump
-
Lol. You said "smart Democrats"... cute.EwaDawg said:
Smart democrats voted republican in the primaries. And they didn't vote for the fucking moron Trump.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
-
So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.OZONE said:
I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
Arf....arf... -
I didn't realize you were this stupid.HoustonHusky said:
So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.OZONE said:
I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
Arf....arf...
Not that I bothered paying attention to you before.
The math depends on the methodology, and what is and isn't included in the denominator and numerator for the equation.
You might learn that if you ever make it to college. But you sound like a typical blue collar Trump support. Dropped out in the 9th grade? -
One of many...OZONE said:
Who published these estimates you refer to?HoustonHusky said:there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows
Arf...arf...away. Keep lapping up the Clinton propaganda. -
Welome to January. A lot has changed.HoustonHusky said:
One of many...OZONE said:
Who published these estimates you refer to?HoustonHusky said:there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows
-
I've got an education you could only dream of getting...but keep telling yourself whatever you need to sleep at night.OZONE said:
I didn't realize you were this stupid.HoustonHusky said:
So you aren't convinced of math. Specifically, something like down 20%, and that's including all the non-Democrat independents that came out to vote Bernie in the open primaries.OZONE said:
I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
Arf....arf...
Not that I bothered paying attention to you before.
The math depends on the methodology, and what is and isn't included in the denominator and numerator for the equation.
You might learn that if you ever make it to college. But you sound like a typical blue collar Trump support. Dropped out in the 9th grade? -
Yup. Since then over 100,000 crossed party lines in Pennsylvania alone to vote Trump in the primary. Go read Van Jones' take on it.OZONE said:
Welome to January. A lot has changed.HoustonHusky said:
One of many...OZONE said:
Who published these estimates you refer to?HoustonHusky said:there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows
Keep lapping up the Clinton Kool Aide...arf...arf... -
WWE has the highest pay per view revenue.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
Welcome to this week's meaningless stats. -
The GOP establishment wants Hillary to win.
She is money in the bank.
-
True. Funny too how this CNN article with no stats or anything magically shows up on the same day Hills gets her FBI interview. All for lemmings like OZONE to try and propogate/diffuse the news of the day.
-
They were votes.OZONE said:
I'm not convinced they were. I'd have to see the methodology of whatever analysis backs up your claim. But there could be a lot of reasons, such as... so many Dems were convinced that Clinton had it in the bag, they didn't feel the need to turn out for primaries. It could also be that some of those turning out for Bernie's events weren't counted in the analysis if they weren't registered as Dems. Depends on what numbers you believe, and the methodology used to derive those numbers.PurpleJ said:
So why were Democratic primary numbers down?OZONE said:
Since our nation's population gets larger every year, it would make sense that each 4 years you'd have more people turning out to such events. It isn't really that big a deal, especially with the rest of the dreck that was running against him.PurpleJ said:Trump had the highest turnout in any Republican primary of all time. Wonder where those people came from?
This piece sheds some light on turnout http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/08/so-far-turnout-in-this-years-primaries-rivals-2008-record/
Methodology used was counting.
It went something like this... One, two, three, four, five, six, etc.
Still confused? -
Successful trolls are successful.HoustonHusky said:
Yup. Since then over 100,000 crossed party lines in Pennsylvania alone to vote Trump in the primary. Go read Van Jones' take on it.OZONE said:
Welome to January. A lot has changed.HoustonHusky said:
One of many...OZONE said:
Who published these estimates you refer to?HoustonHusky said:there are estimates of up to 20% of democrats voting for Trump
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/265330-some-dems-would-defect-for-trump-poll-shows
Keep lapping up the Clinton Kool Aide...arf...arf... -
Hillary the Felonious candidate! Vote early and vote often!
-
Hilliary is the victim of a vast right wing conspiracy. When she finally becomes President, her first order of business will be to rid the country of this menace and eliminate this threat to our way of life.
