Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Outcoached
Comments
-
Last week's loss was the turning point. If you weren't so AuburndoogFuckingStupid, you would realize it.Auburndawg said:It will play out. And there will be a turning point, one way or the other.
UW is already dead and buried in the Pac-12 North.
Oregon 3-0
Oregon State 2-0
Stanford 3-1
Washington State 2-1
Washington 1-2
California 0-2
The fucking season is over. -
Turning point as in Sark's future.
If we win 9 games or more the perception will be the program is improving.
Anything less and momentum will begin to build against him in the real world. You know, among people who don't use phrases like "fucktard," and "plunger rape." People who donate money to the program and actually attend games.
The media will start turning if we lose next week. -
The 2013 season was over when Sark wasn't fired at Martin Vandal Stadium last year.
-
If Sark manages to beat ASU, the next two weeks will be gimmes (Cal and Colorado). He'll be 7-2 and everyone will say everything is going great.
-
That might be the perception but the reality is we beat lowly teams, play straight-up with average teams, and lose to the best teams.Auburndawg said:Turning point as in Sark's future.
If we win 9 games or more the perception will be the program is improving.
Anything less and momentum will begin to build against him in the real world. You know, among people who don't use phrases like "fucktard," and "plunger rape." People who donate money to the program and actually attend games.
The media will start turning if we lose next week.
Isn't the goal supposed to be an elite team?
-
My man, it's not about tomfoolery or trickeration. It's ABOUT THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Auburndawg said:Oregon is a machine. They are supremely well coached. We aren't.
The big difference today was blown coverages. They had receivers wide open all day because we were fooled.
Its playing out. 9 or 10 wins are still very possible, but so is 7-6. But this loss today is on Sark.
Our QB had no time, their's had a lot of time. Have you ever been a db, even in HS? Ever been an outside backline player in soccer? Every guarded a player in hoops who could handle the ball?
It's really fucking hard to cover/guard someone coming at you, someone who knows where he's going while you don't, and you have to react and stay tight on him as he cuts and accelerates and decelerates and accelerates again and cuts again and basically attempts to catch you leaning the wrong way.
So even people who are really fucking good at it can only do it for so long. Eventually, the offensive guy wins.
THat is why they were so open. Yeah, there were some blown coverages, but I've been watching cfb for a really long time, and in my humble estimation, we have the D backfield to compete at a high level. No, there is not Anthony Vontoure back there. Those guys don't grow on trees. But the guys we have can cover and play, but they can't do it all day.
Sark's failure at getting the uglies on both sides of the ball is why this keeps happening against elite teams.
Period.
-
That's not what I saw. What I saw were our LBs and DBs over committing to stopping the run, staring at the ball, and losing receivers. I think Wilcox wanted to make Mariotta beat us, and he did.creepycoug said:
My man, it's not about tomfoolery or trickeration. It's ABOUT THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Auburndawg said:Oregon is a machine. They are supremely well coached. We aren't.
The big difference today was blown coverages. They had receivers wide open all day because we were fooled.
Its playing out. 9 or 10 wins are still very possible, but so is 7-6. But this loss today is on Sark.
Our QB had no time, there's had a lot of time. Have you ever been a db, even in HS? Ever been an outside backline player in soccer? Every guarded a player in hoops who could handle the ball?
It's really fucking hard to cover/guard someone coming at you, someone who knows where he's going while you don't, and you have to react and stay tight on him as he cuts and accelerates and decelerates and accelerates again and cuts again and basically attempts to catch you leaning the wrong way.
So even people who are really fucking good at it can only do it for so long. Eventually, the offensive guy wins.
THat is why they were so open. Yeah, there were some blown coverages, but I've been watching cfb for a really long time, and in my humble estimation, we have the D backfield to compete at a high level. No, there is not Anthony Vontoure back there. Those guys don't grow on trees. But the guys we have can cover and play, but they can't do it all day.
Sark's failure at getting the uglies on both sides of the ball is why this keeps happening against elite teams.
Period. -
U can't win with the pass rush we were getting, it was nonexistent the whole gameAuburndawg said:
That's not what I saw. What I saw were our LBs and DBs over committing to stopping the run, staring at the ball, and losing receivers. I think Wilcox wanted to make Mariotta beat us, and he did.creepycoug said:
My man, it's not about tomfoolery or trickeration. It's ABOUT THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Auburndawg said:Oregon is a machine. They are supremely well coached. We aren't.
The big difference today was blown coverages. They had receivers wide open all day because we were fooled.
Its playing out. 9 or 10 wins are still very possible, but so is 7-6. But this loss today is on Sark.
Our QB had no time, there's had a lot of time. Have you ever been a db, even in HS? Ever been an outside backline player in soccer? Every guarded a player in hoops who could handle the ball?
It's really fucking hard to cover/guard someone coming at you, someone who knows where he's going while you don't, and you have to react and stay tight on him as he cuts and accelerates and decelerates and accelerates again and cuts again and basically attempts to catch you leaning the wrong way.
So even people who are really fucking good at it can only do it for so long. Eventually, the offensive guy wins.
THat is why they were so open. Yeah, there were some blown coverages, but I've been watching cfb for a really long time, and in my humble estimation, we have the D backfield to compete at a high level. No, there is not Anthony Vontoure back there. Those guys don't grow on trees. But the guys we have can cover and play, but they can't do it all day.
Sark's failure at getting the uglies on both sides of the ball is why this keeps happening against elite teams.
Period.
-
This I agree with. Wilcox didn't blitz nearly enoughdhdawg said:
U can't win with the pass rush we were getting, it was nonexistent the whole gameAuburndawg said:
That's not what I saw. What I saw were our LBs and DBs over committing to stopping the run, staring at the ball, and losing receivers. I think Wilcox wanted to make Mariotta beat us, and he did.creepycoug said:
My man, it's not about tomfoolery or trickeration. It's ABOUT THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!Auburndawg said:Oregon is a machine. They are supremely well coached. We aren't.
The big difference today was blown coverages. They had receivers wide open all day because we were fooled.
Its playing out. 9 or 10 wins are still very possible, but so is 7-6. But this loss today is on Sark.
Our QB had no time, there's had a lot of time. Have you ever been a db, even in HS? Ever been an outside backline player in soccer? Every guarded a player in hoops who could handle the ball?
It's really fucking hard to cover/guard someone coming at you, someone who knows where he's going while you don't, and you have to react and stay tight on him as he cuts and accelerates and decelerates and accelerates again and cuts again and basically attempts to catch you leaning the wrong way.
So even people who are really fucking good at it can only do it for so long. Eventually, the offensive guy wins.
THat is why they were so open. Yeah, there were some blown coverages, but I've been watching cfb for a really long time, and in my humble estimation, we have the D backfield to compete at a high level. No, there is not Anthony Vontoure back there. Those guys don't grow on trees. But the guys we have can cover and play, but they can't do it all day.
Sark's failure at getting the uglies on both sides of the ball is why this keeps happening against elite teams.
Period. -
So I guess when Oregon stomps EVERY fucking opponent, the losers can just claim to be outcoached Auburn? We lost because Oregon is better. Just pat them on the back and move on. We lost! now comes ASU...that's the nature of this conference. And ASU is as good as us and could very well beat us.Auburndawg said:Oregon is a machine. They are supremely well coached. We aren't.
The big difference today was blown coverages. They had receivers wide open all day because we were fooled.
Its playing out. 9 or 10 wins are still very possible, but so is 7-6. But this loss today is on Sark.
We held Oregon to 45. props! Lets go 10-2 and hope for the best. I thought Sark would win today and win the damn North. Stanford lost. Too bad Sark didn't implement ASJ in the gameplan. pretty obvious the WR's were outmatched. We lost. Sark ain't winning north.
I'm wrong and shouldn't be. the schedule was there, the players were there, the defense was there (nobody is going to hold UO under 500-600yds.) Sark just pissed away our best chance at a rosebowl in 13 years. Now I'm pissed, but I understand this is the most difficult division in College Football. I'm done for now. I'm baffled.
