Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

President tramples all over the Constitution

2

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,073 Founders Club
    Profiling is constitutional
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    truth hurts... sends the weak to their safe zones.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    If you can't see we need common sense profiling laws I can't help you
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,797 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.

    Latest Fair and Impartial Policing policy from Dr. lorie Fridell and in use by many P.D's around the nation.

    "Officers shall not consider race, ethnic background, gender, sexual orientation, religion, economic status or age in carrying out law enforcement activities except when credible, locally relevant information links a person or people of a specific race/ethnicity to a specific unlawful incident, or to specific unlawful incidents, criminal patterns or schemes. The restriction on the use of race/ethnicity does not apply to law enforcement activities designed to strengthen the departments relationship with diverse communities."

    Searching old white women in wheel chairs hasn't seemed to solve our terrorist problems. But you can't figure out why it isn't working........
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,797 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Is he going to look in the mirror?

    Why don't you just come out and say Trump is a Muslim?
    Nope maybe if Obozo did the same he might see something dangerous.

    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
    You had to edit that?
    I don't type well I didn't attend "chick classes". Not considered acceptable for men in my time.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    "Chick classes" we're the best. Easy shit, play ignorant yet sensitive, seek 'study partner', plagerize, fuck.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,842

    "Constitution in tatters, crime down."

    Ok, sure.

    For every 1 lawyer who will say profiling shreds the Constitution, I can provide one who says it does not.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    Why should things like starting to dress like Middle East pilgrims, alienating your family, traveling to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, getting a strictly religious mail order bride from Pakistan, going to the Mosque a lot more and shopping for assault rifles set off any alarms? Don't we all do that? Damn that fascist Trump and his "commons sense."
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,797 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.