Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

President tramples all over the Constitution

2001400ex
2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
Well the presumed HHB president.

“I think profiling is something we’re going to have to start thinking about as a country,” Trump said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday when asked if the profiling of U.S. Muslims would be part of his counterterrorism plan. “I hate the concept of profiling. But we have to use common sense. We’re not using common sense.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-muslim-profiling-000000496.html

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,126 Standard Supporter
    Are you against the common part or the sense part?

    Abundance?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    Is he going to look in the mirror?
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Sledog said:

    Is he going to look in the mirror?

    Why don't you just come out and say Trump is a Muslim?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2016

    Sledog said:

    Is he going to look in the mirror?

    Why don't you just come out and say Trump is a Muslim?
    Nope maybe if Obozo did the same he might see something dangerous.

    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Is he going to look in the mirror?

    Why don't you just come out and say Trump is a Muslim?
    Nope maybe if Obozo did the same he might see something dangerous.

    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
    You had to edit that?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    So: "I hate to be a fascist, but somebody's gotta."
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    New York City had lower crime after profiling than it did before profiling.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    It's not about reducing crime. It's about boosting criminal's self -esteem so that their Pride might prevent them from re-offending.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    "Constitution in tatters, crime down."

    Ok, sure.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
    Profiling is constitutional
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    truth hurts... sends the weak to their safe zones.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    If you can't see we need common sense profiling laws I can't help you
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.

    Latest Fair and Impartial Policing policy from Dr. lorie Fridell and in use by many P.D's around the nation.

    "Officers shall not consider race, ethnic background, gender, sexual orientation, religion, economic status or age in carrying out law enforcement activities except when credible, locally relevant information links a person or people of a specific race/ethnicity to a specific unlawful incident, or to specific unlawful incidents, criminal patterns or schemes. The restriction on the use of race/ethnicity does not apply to law enforcement activities designed to strengthen the departments relationship with diverse communities."

    Searching old white women in wheel chairs hasn't seemed to solve our terrorist problems. But you can't figure out why it isn't working........
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Is he going to look in the mirror?

    Why don't you just come out and say Trump is a Muslim?
    Nope maybe if Obozo did the same he might see something dangerous.

    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.
    You had to edit that?
    I don't type well I didn't attend "chick classes". Not considered acceptable for men in my time.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    "Chick classes" we're the best. Easy shit, play ignorant yet sensitive, seek 'study partner', plagerize, fuck.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

    "Constitution in tatters, crime down."

    Ok, sure.

    For every 1 lawyer who will say profiling shreds the Constitution, I can provide one who says it does not.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    Why should things like starting to dress like Middle East pilgrims, alienating your family, traveling to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, getting a strictly religious mail order bride from Pakistan, going to the Mosque a lot more and shopping for assault rifles set off any alarms? Don't we all do that? Damn that fascist Trump and his "commons sense."
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
    Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.

    HTH
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Thread stopped delivering. I wonder why???
  • SweatpantsGeneral
    SweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,161 Founders Club
    I can't believe this is being discussed. Of course profiling has, should, and is being done.

    What is the gender, age, and ethnicity of those that have perpetrated terrorist attacks in this country in the modern era ---- overwhelmingly, though, they constitute a small percentage of the population?

    This has nothing to do with the Constitution. Jesus.

    Grow up.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    The word's "Liberal" and "logic" are never used together. Liberals have replaced logic with emotion in the decision making process.
  • SweatpantsGeneral
    SweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,161 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
    Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.

    HTH
    You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.


    That really is all I need to say.


  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    koopdog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
    Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.

    HTH
    You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.


    That really is all I need to say.


    A meme would have been more effective but I was too lazy to grab one.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    koopdog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
    Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.

    HTH
    You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.


    That really is all I need to say.


    Cocktail and Road House made me the man I am today.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    topdawgnc said:

    "Constitution in tatters, crime down."

    Ok, sure.

    For every 1 lawyer who will say profiling shreds the Constitution, I can provide one who says it does not.
    How do you tie your shoes in the morning without tripping?
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    koopdog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
    Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.

    HTH
    You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.

    That really is all I need to say.

    But for the definite wood hit of Elisabeth Shue, which gives you immunity, shame on you for referencing that FS horrible movie, Koopdog.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,126 Standard Supporter

    koopdog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:


    It's not profiling if the people being looked at fit the profile of those doing the crime in a place where the crimes are likely to occur.

    Fuck you're stupid. That's exactly what profiling is.
    Fuck you're dumb as a box of rocks. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's probably a duck. If ducks are committing certain crimes in certain areas they're still ducks. If you're looking for ducks checking dogs won't do much good.
    You are too retarded for words. You've once again recited the definition of "profiling" to a T, yet are still contending that what you're describing is not profiling.

    Here's a hint; profiling should be common practice for every law enforcement agency. The more you treat it like a dirty word, the more the "libtards" that you hate so much will continue to advance their anti-profiling agenda.
    Sure you tell one of the national experts that teaches it she's wrong. This is the cutting edge but you're as sharp as the edge of town.
    Teachers are those who can't hack it in the real world.

    HTH
    You watched the movie "Cocktail" and let it become part of your world view.

    That really is all I need to say.

    But for the definite wood hit of Elisabeth Shue, which gives you immunity, shame on you for referencing that FS horrible movie, Koopdog.
    And a big fuck you for not recognizing Gina Gershon in that fuckfest of a movie. One damned fine woman.

    image