Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump has the answer to mass shootings

2

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    "If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."

    Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?

    Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?

    Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.



    You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.
    No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    This thread is full of fail.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    "If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."

    Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?

    Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?

    Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.



    You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.
    No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.

    The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.

    But keep supporting Trump.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,733
    Of the 10 largest gun violence events that have occurred on American soil, 8 of them have happened under obama's watch. Not that there's anything working with that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HuskyInAZ said:

    Of the 10 largest gun violence events that have occurred on American soil, 8 of them have happened under obama's watch. Not that there's anything working with that.

    And they still don't add up to 9/11.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    "If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."

    Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?

    Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?

    Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.



    You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.
    No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.

    The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.

    But keep supporting Trump.
    They aren't *real* Islamists?!?

    I have absolutely no issue with calling fuckwads 'radical christian extremists'. (Note the use of the lower case c). They are fuckwads and should be exposed as posers by true believers of that faith.

    The fuck do you call them then?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    "If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."

    Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?

    Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?

    Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.



    You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.
    No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.

    The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.

    But keep supporting Trump.
    All Muslims are terrorists. HTH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/283218-orlando-shooters-imam-is-pro-trump

    Oh, right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter
    doogsinparadise said:

    thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/283218-orlando-shooters-imam-is-pro-trump

    Oh, right.

    I think there was some twisting there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    "If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."

    Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?

    Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?

    Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.



    You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.
    No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.

    The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.

    But keep supporting Trump.
    You can't really be this willfully ignorant.

    They think they're the fucking caliphate. It doesn't get more Islamic.

    The moderate Muslims, insofar as they actually exist, are the watered down, secular, mediocre Muslims. ISIL* is the real fucking deal. Pretending they're not real Muslims is just burying your head in the sand before they cut it off.

    Read this before you make another stupid ass reply.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter