Trump has the answer to mass shootings
Comments
-
There's over a billion Muslims in the world. But the thousands that call themselves part of ISIL are the real ones. Got it.dnc said:
You can't really be this willfully ignorant.2001400ex said:
The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.PurpleThrobber said:
No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.2001400ex said:
You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.PurpleThrobber said:"If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."
Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?
Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?
Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.
But keep supporting Trump.
They think they're the fucking caliphate. It doesn't get more Islamic.
The moderate Muslims, insofar as they actually exist, are the watered down, secular, mediocre Muslims. ISIL* is the real fucking deal. Pretending they're not real Muslims is just burying your head in the sand before they cut it off.
Read this before you make another stupid ass reply. -
Not saying they're the only *REAL* Muslims, but Islam is not some tangential aspect of who they we or what they do. They are founded upon Islam, radical about Islam and what they're doing is based completely upon the teachings of Islam. To deny they're actual Muslims is Obama FS.2001400ex said:
There's over a billion Muslims in the world. But the thousands that call themselves part of ISIL are the real ones. Got it.dnc said:
You can't really be this willfully ignorant.2001400ex said:
The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.PurpleThrobber said:
No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.2001400ex said:
You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.PurpleThrobber said:"If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."
Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?
Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?
Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.
But keep supporting Trump.
They think they're the fucking caliphate. It doesn't get more Islamic.
The moderate Muslims, insofar as they actually exist, are the watered down, secular, mediocre Muslims. ISIL* is the real fucking deal. Pretending they're not real Muslims is just burying your head in the sand before they cut it off.
Read this before you make another stupid ass reply. -
the ONLY one referencing "ISIL" is Obama2001400ex said:
There's over a billion Muslims in the world. But the thousands that call themselves part of ISIL are the real ones. Got it.dnc said:
You can't really be this willfully ignorant.2001400ex said:
The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.PurpleThrobber said:
No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.2001400ex said:
You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.PurpleThrobber said:"If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."
Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?
Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?
Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.
But keep supporting Trump.
They think they're the fucking caliphate. It doesn't get more Islamic.
The moderate Muslims, insofar as they actually exist, are the watered down, secular, mediocre Muslims. ISIL* is the real fucking deal. Pretending they're not real Muslims is just burying your head in the sand before they cut it off.
Read this before you make another stupid ass reply.
Fuckoff -
Sounds like you care.sarktastic said:
the ONLY one referencing "ISIL" is Obama2001400ex said:
There's over a billion Muslims in the world. But the thousands that call themselves part of ISIL are the real ones. Got it.dnc said:
You can't really be this willfully ignorant.2001400ex said:
The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.PurpleThrobber said:
No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.2001400ex said:
You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.PurpleThrobber said:"If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."
Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?
Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?
Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.
But keep supporting Trump.
They think they're the fucking caliphate. It doesn't get more Islamic.
The moderate Muslims, insofar as they actually exist, are the watered down, secular, mediocre Muslims. ISIL* is the real fucking deal. Pretending they're not real Muslims is just burying your head in the sand before they cut it off.
Read this before you make another stupid ass reply.
Fuckoff -
2001400ex said:
Sounds like you CAIR.sarktastic said:
the ONLY one referencing "ISIL" is Obama2001400ex said:
There's over a billion Muslims in the world. But the thousands that call themselves part of ISIL are the real ones. Got it.dnc said:
You can't really be this willfully ignorant.2001400ex said:
The point is that ISIL and related terrorists are not real Islamists. Just like we wouldn't call people radical Christians. Not to mention the fact that there is still many facts unknown about the shooter. Then when you read Trump's full comments, he blames Obama for not saying radical Islam.PurpleThrobber said:
No - really, go ahead with your explanation per my first post. Your interpretation. Not some 'talking point' or deflection mechanism. Hold court.2001400ex said:
You missed the point. I suggest you research the matter. Rather than repeat conservative taking points you have no clue anything about.PurpleThrobber said:"If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words 'Radical Islam' she should get out of this race for the Presidency."
Please to be explaining why that is an improper stance?
Or rather why it is so important NOT to use the phrase "Radical Islamic Terrorists"?
Is it because the peaceful Muslims might be offended? Because if those three words send them into a killing frenzy, this is a far bigger war than just the radicalized faction.
But keep supporting Trump.
They think they're the fucking caliphate. It doesn't get more Islamic.
The moderate Muslims, insofar as they actually exist, are the watered down, secular, mediocre Muslims. ISIL* is the real fucking deal. Pretending they're not real Muslims is just burying your head in the sand before they cut it off.
Read this before you make another stupid ass reply.
Fuckoff
