UCLA AD, and conference representative, goes rogue on satellite camps
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/4/20/11475718/pac-12-satellite-camp-ban-ucla-dan-guerrero
Comments
-
-
It has to be unanimous? Fucking stupid organizations have fucking stupid rules
-
No, Guerrero just did whatever he wanted knowing that Larry Scott has no power. What's he gonna do- drop Pac-12 Network coverage of UCLA games?PostGameOrangeSlices said:It has to be unanimous? Fucking stupid organizations have fucking stupid rules
-
The best part is the MWC and Sun Belt reps also gave a giant middle finger to their conference commissioners and voted their own self interest.
But how is the Pac-12 a shit tier conference? -
Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
Loser attitude for a loser football programBallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
You mean like the entire SEC?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Loser attitude for a loser football programBallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
It's a no brainer to vote no to satellite camps if you're based out of southern california. With scholarship limits, why would you give free exposure to the 2nd/3rd tier athletes you pass on that have potential to be good to other programs?
Let them trickle to San Jose St. or get lost in the shuffle instead of developing in a P5 program and biting you in the ass 3-5 years down the road.
Of all the shit to bash UCLA on, this isn't one of them. -
Yeah no shit. But how does UCLA get to vote on their own self-interest instead of the will of the conference? Can you imagine the Minnesota AD crossing Jim Delaney like that? I think not.Doogles said:It's a no brainer to vote no to satellite camps if you're based out of southern california. With scholarship limits, why would you give free exposure to the 2nd/3rd tier athletes you pass on that have potential to be good to other programs?
Let them trickle to San Jose St. or get lost in the shuffle instead of developing in a P5 program and biting you in the ass 3-5 years down the road.
Of all the shit to bash UCLA on, this isn't one of them.
(On a side note I actually think the ban is in the self interest of UW as well. Increased exposure of Nebraska, Michigan, Oklahoma, et al in SoCal would not have been good for UW and I can't see CP taking huge advantage of the rule- he has his established process.) -
Bruins are fags. Water is wet.
-
Super delegate. Hate the game, not the playa.
-
#OurMoraRaceBannon said:Bruins are fags. Water is wet.
-
When Mike Neal starts catching passes and scoring TDs, you'll have the strongest argument why the satellite camps work. UCLA/SC had zero interest. The non 4/5 star hyped kids benefit the most. Poor kids benefit. Shit, driving from Redlands to Westwood on a Saturday is ridiculously difficult. I'm with Pete on this: it serves UWs interest but it also serves the underrated kids who don't have the LPT peforming electronic fellatio on them via the twatters, text, snapchat, etc.
Dan Guerrero is no better then the coach in all the right moves. Asshole. -
Apparently Guerrero went rogue and was supposed to vote in favor of Satellite camps like the rest of the conference.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/15283612/ucla-bruins-ad-dan-guerrero-voted-wrong-way-satellite-camps-pac-12-commissioner-says -
Pretty much this with a bullet ...AEB said:When Mike Neal starts catching passes and scoring TDs, you'll have the strongest argument why the satellite camps work. UCLA/SC had zero interest. The non 4/5 star hyped kids benefit the most. Poor kids benefit. Shit, driving from Redlands to Westwood on a Saturday is ridiculously difficult. I'm with Pete on this: it serves UWs interest but it also serves the underrated kids who don't have the LPT peforming electronic fellatio on them via the twatters, text, snapchat, etc.
Dan Guerrero is no better then the coach in all the right moves. Asshole.
And for those that think that decreased competition is to our benefit, that's loser talk. The idea that Pete does have his process has merit. But at the same time, part of the deal for Pete and his coaches to be successful in executing that process is being able to get out in front of HS coaches and kids that have interest in the UW program. Not every kid is able to hop onto a plane multiple times to come to Seattle to visit the program and same for every HS coach.
Guerrero's excuse that he read the tea leaves and voted for the one that was the most consistent with the conference is BS. It's one thing if he called Larry Scott and said "hey, I'm seeing the tea leaves down here and it's looking like it is going to pass. Should we have an impromptu call with the ADs to discuss best course of action from here forward?" Or, it's another thing if during the meetings where the conference voted on this that they also agreed to a contingency plan on what happens if the conference's desired position wasn't looking like it was going to materialize. But by all accounts Guerrero went rogue and acted on his own.
In most walks of life, that's at minimum walking the line of a terminable offense. -
I believe Guerrero's excuse, because it fits with his long history of being a fucktarded bureaucrat. If the vote was already DOA just vote the way the Conf told you to vote. Who cares at that point?Tequilla said:
Pretty much this with a bullet ...AEB said:When Mike Neal starts catching passes and scoring TDs, you'll have the strongest argument why the satellite camps work. UCLA/SC had zero interest. The non 4/5 star hyped kids benefit the most. Poor kids benefit. Shit, driving from Redlands to Westwood on a Saturday is ridiculously difficult. I'm with Pete on this: it serves UWs interest but it also serves the underrated kids who don't have the LPT peforming electronic fellatio on them via the twatters, text, snapchat, etc.
Dan Guerrero is no better then the coach in all the right moves. Asshole.
And for those that think that decreased competition is to our benefit, that's loser talk. The idea that Pete does have his process has merit. But at the same time, part of the deal for Pete and his coaches to be successful in executing that process is being able to get out in front of HS coaches and kids that have interest in the UW program. Not every kid is able to hop onto a plane multiple times to come to Seattle to visit the program and same for every HS coach.
Guerrero's excuse that he read the tea leaves and voted for the one that was the most consistent with the conference is BS. It's one thing if he called Larry Scott and said "hey, I'm seeing the tea leaves down here and it's looking like it is going to pass. Should we have an impromptu call with the ADs to discuss best course of action from here forward?" Or, it's another thing if during the meetings where the conference voted on this that they also agreed to a contingency plan on what happens if the conference's desired position wasn't looking like it was going to materialize. But by all accounts Guerrero went rogue and acted on his own.
In most walks of life, that's at minimum walking the line of a terminable offense.
What an Idiot. Hopefully he gets fired over it. -
That post is soft just like your Foo,.... well you already know that huh ballbag?BallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
Since we? have a winning record against the huskies and coogs...I'll defer to your greater expertise of what constitutes soft.salemcoog said:
That post is soft just like your Foo,.... well you already know that huh ballbag?BallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
-
Soft is not being able to hold a lead at home with a minute left in the game when it was supposed to count for you.BallSacked said:
Since we? have a winning record against the huskies and coogs...I'll defer to your greater expertise of what constitutes soft.salemcoog said:
That post is soft just like your Foo,.... well you already know that huh ballbag?BallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
But congrats on all of that domination that noone remembers. -
You get top 10 recruiting classes every year and get plungered by Stanford every year.BallSacked said:
Since we? have a winning record against the huskies and coogs...I'll defer to your greater expertise of what constitutes soft.salemcoog said:
That post is soft just like your Foo,.... well you already know that huh ballbag?BallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
The South hasn't won one conference title since the PAC 12 began. UW kind of sucks. UCLA also kind of sucks. WSU really sucks. -
Cool story. Bottom line: we own you. Even Donahue beat up on DJ.RoadDawg55 said:
You get top 10 recruiting classes every year and get plungered by Stanford every year.BallSacked said:
Since we? have a winning record against the huskies and coogs...I'll defer to your greater expertise of what constitutes soft.salemcoog said:
That post is soft just like your Foo,.... well you already know that huh ballbag?BallSacked said:Good. Stay in Seattle Church school fags.
The South hasn't won one conference title since the PAC 12 began. UW kind of sucks. UCLA also kind of sucks. WSU really sucks.
Quite honestly, if you guys had to play us in 1991 you would have 0.5 less NATTYs. Simple fact.
-
Tomorrow is Friday
-
Sounds like I'm in your head.RaceBannon said:Tomorrow is Friday
-
Chianti Dan
-
-
Sounds unoriginalBallSacked said: -
Ball bag saying he's in someone's head is fucking rich. Take a hint and fuck off out of here dude. You just aren't good enough to be our token Bruin. That honor is already held by @coronabruin
-
PurpleJ said:
Ball bag saying he's in someone's head is fucking rich. Take a hint and fuck off out of here dude. You just aren't good enough to be our token Bruin. That honor is already held by @coronabruin
-
Had a great day dude! Hope yours was as swell as mine! Now take a hydrochloric acid enema and fuck off to some bruin doogbored or whatever!
-
How long until you OD on opioids?PurpleJ said:Had a great day dude! Hope yours was as swell as mine! Now take a hydrochloric acid enema and fuck off to some bruin doogbored or whatever!
Hopefully soon.
