Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
PM to iDawg

Dardanus
Member Posts: 2,623
I'm hearing you want to see winning percentage versus first round draft picks.
I was hesitant to create these since I prefer humour over real metrics, but if you keep making podcasts I'll keep making charts.



I was hesitant to create these since I prefer humour over real metrics, but if you keep making podcasts I'll keep making charts.



Tagged:
Comments
-
Paging @TheChart
-
They! suck.
-
Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington) -
Yeah that sounds right. This is why I stay away from real metrics.Hippopeteamus said:Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington) -
-
Well, to be frank, I stay away from any original or substantive poasting.Dardanus said:
Yeah that sounds right. This is why I stay away from real metrics.Hippopeteamus said:Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington) -
One of manyHippopeteamus said:
Well, to be frank, I stay away from any original or substantive poasting.Dardanus said:
Yeah that sounds right. This is why I stay away from real metrics.Hippopeteamus said:Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington) -
Sounds like Washington gets a loss with more.
-
-
So what you are saying is that we? suck?
Shocking. -
Cal too high