PM to iDawg

Dardanus

I'm hearing you want to see winning percentage versus first round draft picks.

I was hesitant to create these since I prefer humour over real metrics, but if you keep making podcasts I'll keep making charts.

ThomasFremont

Paging @TheChart

GrundleStiltzkin

They! suck.

Hippopeteamus

Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington)

Dardanus

Hippopeteamus said:

Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington)

Yeah that sounds right. This is why I stay away from real metrics.

section_332

Hippopeteamus

Dardanus said:

Hippopeteamus said:

Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington)

Yeah that sounds right. This is why I stay away from real metrics.

Well, to be frank, I stay away from any original or substantive poasting.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Hippopeteamus said:

Dardanus said:

Hippopeteamus said:

Shouldn't it be number of 2014 wins per 2015 first round draft picks not 2015 wins per 2015 first round draft picks?
(Not that it matters in the case of Washington)

Yeah that sounds right. This is why I stay away from real metrics.

Well, to be frank, I stay away from any original or substantive poasting.

One of many

Kaepsknee

Sounds like Washington gets a loss with more.

H_D

TheChart

So what you are saying is that we? suck?

Shocking.

BearsWiin

Cal too high