Really like this guy.

creepycoug said:

CuntWaffle said:

Dream scenario would be beating Oregon (I never talk about hypothetical) and Sark jettig for USC and Wilcox becoming interim coach for the rest of the season. We would get a decent taste to how he might fare at HC.

I like Wilcox too he has the demeanor of a HC. He isn't trying to be the medias best friend and even on weeks his D does good all you hear him talk about the next day is how they weren't perfect.

Here's what really happens if we beat Oregon:

1. The goal posts will come down - that is how much things have changed.
2. Sark will give a kick ass presser and all of us, for a moment, will wish we were in his inner circle of friends.
3. All the idiots I call my friends will start using phrases like, "the natural order of things is being restored - us and USC on top again baby!"
4. Someone in the pantheon of power at USC will realize that Sarkesian is a heavier, less handsome version of Lane Kiffin and will not want a redoux.
5. Someone in the pantheon of power at Washington will think we have the next Pete Caroll and role Sarkesian a 5-year extension with a healthy number of 00s attached to it.
6. We'll be stuck forever.

The only time-tested way to get rid of a coach you don't like is to lose. That is what you realistically need to hope for.

Of course he could "win" his way to a better job, but the probabilities on my 1-6 are much higher than him winning and being hired away.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

creepycoug said:

CuntWaffle said:

Dream scenario would be beating Oregon (I never talk about hypothetical) and Sark jettig for USC and Wilcox becoming interim coach for the rest of the season. We would get a decent taste to how he might fare at HC.

I like Wilcox too he has the demeanor of a HC. He isn't trying to be the medias best friend and even on weeks his D does good all you hear him talk about the next day is how they weren't perfect.

Here's what really happens if we beat Oregon:

1. The goal posts will come down - that is how much things have changed.
2. Sark will give a kick ass presser and all of us, for a moment, will wish we were in his inner circle of friends.
3. All the idiots I call my friends will start using phrases like, "the natural order of things is being restored - us and USC on top again baby!"
4. Someone in the pantheon of power at USC will realize that Sarkesian is a heavier, less handsome version of Lane Kiffin and will not want a redoux.
5. Someone in the pantheon of power at Washington will think we have the next Pete Caroll and role Sarkesian a 5-year extension with a healthy number of 00s attached to it.
6. We'll be stuck forever.

The only time-tested way to get rid of a coach you don't like is to lose. That is what you realistically need to hope for.

Of course he could "win" his way to a better job, but the probabilities on my 1-6 are much higher than him winning and being hired away.

YR, YK

I'm not good at rooting for UW losses though. The last time I rooted for UW to lose, Reese dropped the pass in the end zone, Hawaii intercepted it and I celebrated liberation, only for Ty to come back the next year.

The lesson as always: We're fucked whether we win or lose. Might as well doog it up on Saturdays.

I enjoyed the hell out of the magical 2008 season.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CuntWaffle said:

I said "dream scenario" not "realistic scenario". Some of you need to learn the difference.

Your dream scenario blows.

A REAL dream scenario has Nick Saban coaching the Huskies next year.