PFF: UW Freshman took 2,679 snaps last year
Comments
-
"Until then I'd go with the 6-4 stud with the Howitzer for an arm"devildawg said:Bunch of you must be Auburn Dawg with new handles...not sure what the fuck your watching but I'll take Rosen and his upside over JB until I actually see the kid do something
He fell on the ball and got a booboo couldn't answer the bell at home against the Ducks,sat out vs Stanford.When they put the game in his hands vs ASU and Utah totally shit the bed.,got picked vs fucking Kal....the kid really shit the bed in every single loss,he's a freshemn so we cut him some slack but let's see him actually make a BIGTIME throw against a real fucking team before annointing his ass
Until then I'd go with the 6-4 stud with the Howitzer for an arm
The stats are just fucking stats...Miley has better stats than Browning same number of starts
I was wondering where the remaining member of the Jeff George fan club was.
-
Sure. That was potentially fucked up as was going for it against furd was the prior year. But, a coach will and will trust older and more experienced players more than younger and less experienced players. With half of the skill position guys having five games of college football experience, well - coaches coach to the circumstances. Message board coaches, however, just spout shit.Doogles said:
We should have gone for it on 4th and 1 from inside Oregon's 40 instead of punting out of the end zone to gain a whopping 17 yards of field position.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Damn, we should have won 10 games last year with all those underclassmen. Right J?
This is how it's going to work in @Doogles fucked up mind. Every time I see you mention how young we were, I'm going to mention a fucktarded decision by the coaching staff that has nothing to do with the age of the players.
We were young. The coaches still shit the bed numerous times.
What like, his 60% completion percentage, 7.54 yards/attempt, and 134.3 Passer Rating?devildawg said:
Browning is fine he's going to be a good one but where was a he better than Rosen?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Hilarious how hyped Rosen is for next year, when Browning was better than him...
Totally different schemes,Rosen was asked to push the ball down the field,make throws Browning will never make.Rosen looked the better player to me and his stats were better
Versus Browning's 63.3% completion percentage, 8.03 yards/attempt, and 139.7 Passer Rating?
Not to mention, UCLA had an established JR RB who rushed for 1500+ yards in 2014, actual receiving threats in Payton and Duarte, and an OL with about 40 more starts than UW's OL.
-
Not counting incomplete passes: Browning: 12.68 yards per completion. Rosen: 12.57 yards per completion. Browning was also more accurate on passes that traveled over 20 yards in the air (according to PFF), although he probably was not as accurate on balls that traveled 30-50 yards in the air.devildawg said:I like to look at yards,TDs and wins! Also watch the games and not stat sheets
Rosen has a big time cannon for an arm...yards per attempt down mean shit when it's Imcomplete pass
Nobody's knocking Browning Rosen just looks like the better player to just about everyone but doogs
The OP asked where Rosen was better? I'd say all the way around he's just a little better Prospect with a highe ceiling
We could throw up Miles stats from 2014 ? Wtf is that tell you? His 7 ypa didn't mean jack shit and he's no where near the QB Browning is but the stats say he is...he must be fucking good right?
-
Maybe Rosen is better, maybe Browning is. Who knows? Both were good for a freshman, but had some shitty moments. This is kind of a dumb argument. They were freshman QB'S of mediocre teams.
-
Fair.RoadDawg55 said:Maybe Rosen is better, maybe Browning is. Who knows? Both were good for a freshman, but had some shitty moments. This is kind of a dumb argument. They were freshman QB'S of mediocre teams.
Calling one clearly superior using really poor arguments is still some stupid shit though. -
The problem isn't the stats, the problem is you're too dumb to know which stats matter.devildawg said:Bunch of you must be Auburn Dawg with new handles...not sure what the fuck your watching but I'll take Rosen and his upside over JB until I actually see the kid do something
He fell on the ball and got a booboo couldn't answer the bell at home against the Ducks,sat out vs Stanford.When they put the game in his hands vs ASU and Utah totally shit the bed.,got picked vs fucking Kal....the kid really shit the bed in every single loss,he's a freshemn so we cut him some slack but let's see him actually make a BIGTIME throw against a real fucking team before annointing his ass
Until then I'd go with the 6-4 stud with the Howitzer for an arm
The stats are just fucking stats...Miley has better stats than Browning same number of starts
Here's three that matter for each QB's respective most recent season.
YPA: Browning 8.03, Miley 7.29. Huge advantage Browning
QBR: Browning 63.0, Miley 50.0. Huge advantage Browning
Age: Browning true freshman. Miley redshirt sophomore.
Browning was better as a true frosh than Miley was as a RS soph.
You can argue why you think Rosen will be better than Browning - I doubt anyone would argue Rosen's upside is higher. You can't deny Browning was better than him last season. -
You want a knock on Smiff?
The 20 points scored by UW were the least scored by any Oregon opponent in 2015. That includes Georgia State, Colorado, and Oregon State. -
After Slingblade inexplicably threw the ball to stop the clock and give UW a mathematical chance at victory, who does Smith/Petersen roll out to lead the final drive? The upperclassman Captain who has proven the one thing he does well is throw bombs (which would be advantageous in this situation) or the other freshman QB who has 3 career snaps against Sac State (one of which he fumbled).EwaDawg said:
Sure. That was potentially fucked up as was going for it against furd was the prior year. But, a coach will and will trust older and more experienced players more than younger and less experienced players. With half of the skill position guys having five games of college football experience, well - coaches coach to the circumstances. Message board coaches, however, just spout shit.Doogles said:
We should have gone for it on 4th and 1 from inside Oregon's 40 instead of punting out of the end zone to gain a whopping 17 yards of field position.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Damn, we should have won 10 games last year with all those underclassmen. Right J?
This is how it's going to work in @Doogles fucked up mind. Every time I see you mention how young we were, I'm going to mention a fucktarded decision by the coaching staff that has nothing to do with the age of the players.
We were young. The coaches still shit the bed numerous times.
What like, his 60% completion percentage, 7.54 yards/attempt, and 134.3 Passer Rating?devildawg said:
Browning is fine he's going to be a good one but where was a he better than Rosen?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Hilarious how hyped Rosen is for next year, when Browning was better than him...
Totally different schemes,Rosen was asked to push the ball down the field,make throws Browning will never make.Rosen looked the better player to me and his stats were better
Versus Browning's 63.3% completion percentage, 8.03 yards/attempt, and 139.7 Passer Rating?
Not to mention, UCLA had an established JR RB who rushed for 1500+ yards in 2014, actual receiving threats in Payton and Duarte, and an OL with about 40 more starts than UW's OL.
99% of coaches go with the Swede. Our genius brain trust threw Carta in there and he halfheartedly threw a pick immediately. The next week we saw just how unprepared Carta was for the P12 when he shit his pants the first half against Stanford. In his defense, he played better the 2nd half, but it further proves he was not the QB for the situation against Oregon. What's the point of having an upperclassmen captain who can throw bombs if you don't use him when the situation comes up?
Also take note to how truly special Browning is. What we saw from Carta, a Redshirt Frosh, is what we probably should have seen more of from Browning, but for the most part he was solid and held the position down in less than ideal circumstances (inexperienced OL, lack of outside threats, etc.). -
Hey Bill, there's another poster here who like us, gets the game. Congrats Ewa, been waiting. Good post cabrone. Now there's officially 5 members @ HH with a clue. Keep posting.EwaDawg said:
Sure. That was potentially fucked up as was going for it against furd was the prior year. But, a coach will and will trust older and more experienced players more than younger and less experienced players. With half of the skill position guys having five games of college football experience, well - coaches coach to the circumstances. Message board coaches, however, just spout shit.Doogles said:
We should have gone for it on 4th and 1 from inside Oregon's 40 instead of punting out of the end zone to gain a whopping 17 yards of field position.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Damn, we should have won 10 games last year with all those underclassmen. Right J?
This is how it's going to work in @Doogles fucked up mind. Every time I see you mention how young we were, I'm going to mention a fucktarded decision by the coaching staff that has nothing to do with the age of the players.
We were young. The coaches still shit the bed numerous times.
What like, his 60% completion percentage, 7.54 yards/attempt, and 134.3 Passer Rating?devildawg said:
Browning is fine he's going to be a good one but where was a he better than Rosen?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Hilarious how hyped Rosen is for next year, when Browning was better than him...
Totally different schemes,Rosen was asked to push the ball down the field,make throws Browning will never make.Rosen looked the better player to me and his stats were better
Versus Browning's 63.3% completion percentage, 8.03 yards/attempt, and 139.7 Passer Rating?
Not to mention, UCLA had an established JR RB who rushed for 1500+ yards in 2014, actual receiving threats in Payton and Duarte, and an OL with about 40 more starts than UW's OL.
Puppy and Billy's higher discussion board is about to take off. We need good moderators, please consider EWA. Even though you just reiterated what I said earlier! -
I think we're on our own Pups.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Hey Bill, there's another poster here who like us, gets the game. Congrats Ewa, been waiting. Good post cabrone. Now there's officially 5 members @ HH with a clue. Keep posting.EwaDawg said:
Sure. That was potentially fucked up as was going for it against furd was the prior year. But, a coach will and will trust older and more experienced players more than younger and less experienced players. With half of the skill position guys having five games of college football experience, well - coaches coach to the circumstances. Message board coaches, however, just spout shit.Doogles said:
We should have gone for it on 4th and 1 from inside Oregon's 40 instead of punting out of the end zone to gain a whopping 17 yards of field position.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Damn, we should have won 10 games last year with all those underclassmen. Right J?
This is how it's going to work in @Doogles fucked up mind. Every time I see you mention how young we were, I'm going to mention a fucktarded decision by the coaching staff that has nothing to do with the age of the players.
We were young. The coaches still shit the bed numerous times.
What like, his 60% completion percentage, 7.54 yards/attempt, and 134.3 Passer Rating?devildawg said:
Browning is fine he's going to be a good one but where was a he better than Rosen?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Hilarious how hyped Rosen is for next year, when Browning was better than him...
Totally different schemes,Rosen was asked to push the ball down the field,make throws Browning will never make.Rosen looked the better player to me and his stats were better
Versus Browning's 63.3% completion percentage, 8.03 yards/attempt, and 139.7 Passer Rating?
Not to mention, UCLA had an established JR RB who rushed for 1500+ yards in 2014, actual receiving threats in Payton and Duarte, and an OL with about 40 more starts than UW's OL.
Puppy and Billy's higher discussion board is about to take off. We need good moderators, please consider EWA. Even though you just reiterated what I said earlier!
