Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Cooper and Coleman couch sale
Comments
-
Never in mankind has a loud-mouthed meathead bullied (convinced?) super nerds to give him a bunch of stock and responsibility in a company on his way to billions of dollars.
SpoonieLuv said:Next RB meeting

-
-
Got pedophillia?Houhusky said: -
So that's what the inside of the film room looks like. But why are they saying let's eat if there are no lunch pails visible?BlowItUp said: -
Cooper sucks and probably wants a chance to go to a lower level and actually play.
Coleman should be a spokesperson for molasses and probably will end up at Montana State if he leaves.
All this tells me is as follows:
1) The RBs that we signed in this class will come in and play immediately
2) RBs just signed are already probably better than the talent that we have on hand
3) We'll be focusing on another couple of RBs in this next class
4) Opened up another scholarship for the 2017 class
If you're dead weight on this roster, sell the coach or take a medical retirement ... that's the message. -
Isn't it sad that these two spazzes could walk into any Swaye bar and drive off with his tatted chicks in their Lambo any time they wanted. (allegedly)SpoonieLuv said:Next RB meeting

-
A depth chart of Gaskin-McGrew-Dotson would actually be fine for everything but short-yardage stuff. I worry we're going to see a lot more goal line WildSwede. You fags still WDWHA'ing DWarsh?
-
Gaskin is awesome at the goal line. Way better than DWarsh.TTJ said:A depth chart of Gaskin-McGrew-Dotson would actually be fine for everything but short-yardage stuff. I worry we're going to see a lot more goal line WildSwede. You fags still WDWHA'ing DWarsh?
It would be nice to have DWarsh still but not for the goal line package. -
The RBs last year besides Gaskin were dreck (considering that you couldn't trust DWash with the ball in his hands).
I see this as an improvement to the roster -
Exactly.FremontTroll said:
Gaskin is awesome at the goal line. Way better than DWarsh.TTJ said:A depth chart of Gaskin-McGrew-Dotson would actually be fine for everything but short-yardage stuff. I worry we're going to see a lot more goal line WildSwede. You fags still WDWHA'ing DWarsh?
It would be nice to have DWarsh still but not for the goal line package.
If you are looking for a RB to find a small crease and maybe break a tackle, Washington wasn't your guy.







