Cooper and Coleman couch sale
Comments
-
Cooper was just busy with his AARP meeting.
-
Wait, so Gaskin is going to be UW's *biggest* RB in 2016?
-
Is that gaskin and his tutors?
-
Lightskin University
-
Jamon.
And I just realized my spring '16 breakout player of the year is also named after my favorite Spanish cured ham product. -
That's our RB depth?
-
Coleman could've gotten a lot of carries spelling Gaskin if he improved is 5.0 40 time
-
Maybe Coleman had class. Cokehead - who has he favorited on Twitter lately?
-
Too many white guys.
-
-
No wonder the coaches told Pleasant that they plan on him seeing the field this season.
-
In fairness, he looked a lot quicker this season.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Coleman could've gotten a lot of carries spelling Gaskin if he improved is 5.0 40 time
So he must have run about a 5.3 40 the year before. -
Oh fuck
OKGs
-
McGrew isn't even here yet.doogsinparadise said:Too many white guys.
-
I wish at least one of those guys were coming back. I ride for Coop and swear he's kind of good. Not great, but solid. There was a real point in the 2014 season when he was better than Washington and Coleman.
I soured on Coleman, but he was decent when he first started out. Then he got dinged up and ran like a bitch. If you run a 4.9 40, you can't run soft.
If Gaskin gets hurt... Yikes. I guess it would suck in any scenario for Gaskin to get hurt, but still. Get ready for the motion based air raid if it happens. -
Yeah kind of weird they wouldn't bring Cooper back for another year if Coleman was really gone. Maybe he is out of town or something.RoadDawg55 said:I wish at least one of those guys were coming back. I ride for Coop and swear he's kind of good. Not great, but solid. There was a real point in the 2014 season when he was better than Washington and Coleman.
I soured on Coleman, but he was decent when he first started out. Then he got dinged up and ran like a bitch. If you run a 4.9 40, you can't run soft.
If Gaskin gets hurt... Yikes. I guess it would suck in any scenario for Gaskin to get hurt, but still. Get ready for the motion based air raid if it happens.
But eff it Coleman and Cooper both sucked anyways. Jomon Dotson OKG lets ride AEB called it. -
Next RB meeting
-
Didn't they make an Almost Live skit with our RBs?SpoonieLuv said:Next RB meeting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf_bsobwLH8
-
There's something about these running backs that reminds me of Joe Steele.BlowItUp said: -
-
Never in mankind has a loud-mouthed meathead bullied (convinced?) super nerds to give him a bunch of stock and responsibility in a company on his way to billions of dollars.SpoonieLuv said:
Next RB meeting
-
-
Got pedophillia?Houhusky said: -
So that's what the inside of the film room looks like. But why are they saying let's eat if there are no lunch pails visible?BlowItUp said: -
Cooper sucks and probably wants a chance to go to a lower level and actually play.
Coleman should be a spokesperson for molasses and probably will end up at Montana State if he leaves.
All this tells me is as follows:
1) The RBs that we signed in this class will come in and play immediately
2) RBs just signed are already probably better than the talent that we have on hand
3) We'll be focusing on another couple of RBs in this next class
4) Opened up another scholarship for the 2017 class
If you're dead weight on this roster, sell the coach or take a medical retirement ... that's the message. -
Isn't it sad that these two spazzes could walk into any Swaye bar and drive off with his tatted chicks in their Lambo any time they wanted. (allegedly)SpoonieLuv said:Next RB meeting
-
A depth chart of Gaskin-McGrew-Dotson would actually be fine for everything but short-yardage stuff. I worry we're going to see a lot more goal line WildSwede. You fags still WDWHA'ing DWarsh?
-
Gaskin is awesome at the goal line. Way better than DWarsh.TTJ said:A depth chart of Gaskin-McGrew-Dotson would actually be fine for everything but short-yardage stuff. I worry we're going to see a lot more goal line WildSwede. You fags still WDWHA'ing DWarsh?
It would be nice to have DWarsh still but not for the goal line package. -
The RBs last year besides Gaskin were dreck (considering that you couldn't trust DWash with the ball in his hands).
I see this as an improvement to the roster -
Exactly.FremontTroll said:
Gaskin is awesome at the goal line. Way better than DWarsh.TTJ said:A depth chart of Gaskin-McGrew-Dotson would actually be fine for everything but short-yardage stuff. I worry we're going to see a lot more goal line WildSwede. You fags still WDWHA'ing DWarsh?
It would be nice to have DWarsh still but not for the goal line package.
If you are looking for a RB to find a small crease and maybe break a tackle, Washington wasn't your guy.