Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Robot Rubio beep boop beep
Comments
-
Can't wait for all those people calling Obama a liar because he didn't fulfill every campaign promise to watch Trump not fulfill one campaign promise.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
Trump is going to call Ford and tell them to close Mexican operations and build cars in America again. -
You have a Cuban ass?Swaye said:I like Rubio. But that whole exchange made him look like my ass.
-
Trump's not going to be president dumbass2001400ex said:
Can't wait for all those people calling Obama a liar because he didn't fulfill every campaign promise to watch Trump not fulfill one campaign promise.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
Trump is going to call Ford and tell them to close Mexican operations and build cars in America again. -
You can replace Trump with and candidate. Would you prefer me to say Rubio? Same result. He won't accomplish anything he says he will either.dnc said:
Trump's not going to be president dumbass2001400ex said:
Can't wait for all those people calling Obama a liar because he didn't fulfill every campaign promise to watch Trump not fulfill one campaign promise.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
Trump is going to call Ford and tell them to close Mexican operations and build cars in America again.
Cruz??? It'll get tied up in a legal battle and Obama will petition until it gets settled and will have 4 more years.
Really the Republican ticket is just as fucked as the Dems. It's like watching WSU playing Portland State wondering who the most fucked up team is. -
Everybody does it.2001400ex said:
Can't wait for all those people calling Obama a liar because he didn't fulfill every campaign promise to watch Trump not fulfill one campaign promise.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
Trump is going to call Ford and tell them to close Mexican operations and build cars in America again. -
Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
-
2001400ex said:
Can't wait for all those people calling Obama a liar because he didn't fulfill every campaign promise to watch Trump not fulfill one campaign promise.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
Trump is going to call Ford and tell them to close Mexican operations and build cars in America again.
-
You bring up a good point. Here's the bottom line. This notion that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing is just not true. He knows exactly what he's doing.DugtheDoog said:I know Rubio looked like he was shitting his pants there but talking point or not, I absolutely like what he said. The notion that Obubba is just some dumb aww shucks blick president who has completely failed because he doesn't know any better is completely asinine. Obubba is a smart motherfucker.
-
A husky doog is looking for instant results from a guy who just won his first state tonight.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
OK!
It is going to be a beautiful wall, really a tremendous wall. Lot's of people are saying how great the wall is.
If Trump gets elected I could get a wig and do an impersonation. And I would be great at it. -
Huh?RaceBannon said:
A husky doog is looking for instant results from a guy who just won his first state tonight.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
OK!
It is going to be a beautiful wall, really a tremendous wall. Lot's of people are saying how great the wall is.
If Trump gets elected I could get a wig and do an impersonation. And I would be great at it. -
Needed to lean back with more throttle. With the paddle tires, he should have been able to skip the puddle.haie said:2001400ex said:
Can't wait for all those people calling Obama a liar because he didn't fulfill every campaign promise to watch Trump not fulfill one campaign promise.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Meanwhile Trump says every 10 minutes, "we're gonna build a wall, it's gonna be a GREAT wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" and nothing happens.
Fucking republicans are coogin' this shit.
Trump is going to call Ford and tell them to close Mexican operations and build cars in America again. -
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election. -
NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election.
If you think Cruz translates well in the general election, you're a fucking idiot.
-
This. The only hope the GOP has, unless Hillary gets indicted, is that somehow Rubio can get his shit together or Kasich can get traction. Cruz and Trump aren't going to win. Of course I said Trump wouldn't win a single state in the primary. I'm an idiot.ThomasFremont said:NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election.
If you think Cruz translates well in the general election, you're a fucking idiot. -
If this were the 40's and the debates were on the radio, I'd agree. Cruz says much smarter things and generally has his shit together relative to the others. His problem is these things are televised and recorded, and he looks way too creepy saying his smart things to have a prayer in the general election.NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election. -
Just realized I just said Ted Cruz could have won an election in the 40's. I meant based on his debate abilities. Obviously no hispanic would have had a prayer back then. Obvious correction is obvious.
-
Why? What has Hillary ever done to make people think she'll beat anyone?Swaye said:
This. The only hope the GOP has, unless Hillary gets indicted, is that somehow Rubio can get his shit together or Kasich can get traction. Cruz and Trump aren't going to win. Of course I said Trump wouldn't win a single state in the primary. I'm an idiot.ThomasFremont said:NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election.
If you think Cruz translates well in the general election, you're a fucking idiot. -
None of these fucks seem qualified to me.allpurpleallgold said:
Why? What hasSwaye said:
This. The only hope the GOP has, unless Hillary gets indicted, is that somehow Rubio can get his shit together or Kasich can get traction. Cruz and Trump aren't going to win. Of course I said Trump wouldn't win a single state in the primary. I'm an idiot.ThomasFremont said:NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election.
If you think Cruz translates well in the general election, you're a fucking idiot.Hillaryany of the candidates ever done to make people thinkshe'llthey'll beat anyone?
-
I'm not sure that even Cruz's mother actually likes him, which is probably a good place to start for anyone interested in winning national elections.
-
I believe the correct term is madre.doogsinparadise said:I'm not sure that even Cruz's mother actually likes him, which is probably a good place to start for anyone interested in winning national elections.
-
Super delegates. Rigged debate schedule. Everything is against Sanders. This isn't an even up fight. The DNC machine won't let him win.allpurpleallgold said:
Why? What has Hillary ever done to make people think she'll beat anyone?Swaye said:
This. The only hope the GOP has, unless Hillary gets indicted, is that somehow Rubio can get his shit together or Kasich can get traction. Cruz and Trump aren't going to win. Of course I said Trump wouldn't win a single state in the primary. I'm an idiot.ThomasFremont said:NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election.
If you think Cruz translates well in the general election, you're a fucking idiot. -
Swaye said:
Super delegates. Rigged debate schedule. Everything is against Sanders. This isn't an even up fight. The DNC machine won't let him win.allpurpleallgold said:
Why? What has Hillary ever done to make people think she'll beat anyone?Swaye said:
This. The only hope the GOP has, unless Hillary gets indicted, is that somehow Rubio can get his shit together or Kasich can get traction. Cruz and Trump aren't going to win. Of course I said Trump wouldn't win a single state in the primary. I'm an idiot.ThomasFremont said:NEsnake12 said:
If he had to debate Hillary right now it would be a trainwreck. As has been pointed out, Rubio has a problem of sticking to memorized speeches and hugging the same talking points. But I see the same problem with Trump and Bernie too. Trump is all about building a wall, banning Muslims, and winning because he's the most awesome winner to ever win. Bernie *always* has to get back to his points of "fuck the 1%, fuck wall street, free college for everyone, tone down the military."HeretoBeatmyChest said:Rubio is a total lightweight. I'm not sure he would play so well in the general.
It gets them all by (for the most part) in inter-party debates because there's a much smaller discrepancy of viewpoints on a lot of issues, and many of which don't even need to be brought up because of the unanimous inter-party agreement on them. But when 1v1 presidential debates come around and big time issues and attacks are brought up, I'm not convinced any of them can hold their own *at this point in time* against serious and experienced debaters. Their lack of experience will definitely show
Whether you like them or not, the experience of Hillary/Kasich/Bush/Christie makes them much more suited for general election debates than the Rubio/Trump/Bernie crowd. The exception is Ted Cruz, who has similar experience to Rubio but has shown he has a more concrete personal political philosophy (as well as debate skills) that will translate well to a general election.
If you think Cruz translates well in the general election, you're a fucking idiot.
-
Awfully warm for November
-
Kasich is by far the most impressive candidate running. But will he get the electorate to realize that? If he can get past the primaries, his centrist platform will give him a great shot to win the general election.
-
I get the reasoning behind this, but it's been awhile since it worked. When was the last time a centrist won the general election? William Jefferson?HFNY said:Kasich is by far the most impressive candidate running. But will he get the electorate to realize that? If he can get past the primaries, his centrist platform will give him a great shot to win the general election.
-
That's why independents are voting Trump/Sanders.HFNY said:Kasich is by far the most impressive candidate running. But will he get the electorate to realize that? If he can get past the primaries, his centrist platform will give him a great shot to win the general election.
