Predict UW after 6 games
Etc.
Comments
-
Try-hard poaster, try-hard poast...
<---------- -
Guess we shouldn't even play the gaymes then.
-
Win or lose, I booze.
-
I have to pack it up and move to fucking Pullman this summer.
So I fully expect 11-1 with a playoff loss -
Ts and Ps.section_332 said:I have to pack it up and move to fucking Pullman this summer.
So I fully expect 11-1 with a playoff loss -
7-5 after 6 games
-
I think we go 6-6 and win the bowl game, but otherwise a classy poast.PostGameOrangeSlices said:7-5 after 6 games
-
UW can't possibly hope to compete now that Oregon State is serious about football
-
I know you guys are being sarcastic but let's look at just the Pac 12 losses from last year.
Now Goff is gone there is a W. You can't expect to win at home against Jared Goff.
Now that Vernon Adams is gone there is another W. You can't expect to beat UO when they have a Big Sky transfer at QB. Wait...
Stanford is another W. You can't expect to beat Stanford with Randy Hart as DL coach.
Utah is a W. You can't expect to beat Utah at an 8pm kickoff. Plus they had Travis Wilson.
ASU is a W. You can't expect to beat ASU with UW receivers running wide open for what should have been easy scores.
-
-
I think its possible UW finishes with anywhere from 9-11 wins. 10 or 11 win is likely the high water mark and stretch goal. I am very bullish on the defense and that continues to play out. I would be satisfied with 7 or 8 wins. maybe somewhat disappointed with 6, even if I could see it happening and expect changes. I think they are poised for a increase of magnitude that could possibly lead to a really great season where they compete for the Pac12 North and maybe even the playoffs too. 12+ wins isn't out of the question though.
I agree that this has been 4 so-so years for Petersen. I'm more interested in how he's going to remedy this instead of focusing on something that isn't likely to be changed in the next 2 years. -
Now yo'r just twisting.AZDuck said:
-
I want to see 9+ regular season wins. I want to see the offense play to win games and not worry about running some fucking system. Run plays that work.Houhusky said:I think its possible UW finishes with anywhere from 9-11 wins. 10 or 11 win is likely the high water mark and stretch goal. I am very bullish on the defense and that continues to play out. I would be satisfied with 7 or 8 wins. maybe somewhat disappointed with 6, even if I could see it happening and expect changes. I think they are poised for a increase of magnitude that could possibly lead to a really great season where they compete for the Pac12 North and maybe even the playoffs too. 12+ wins isn't out of the question though.
I agree that this has been 4 so-so years for Petersen. I'm more interested in how he's going to remedy this instead of focusing on something that isn't likely to be changed in the next 2 years.
I'm not worried about the defense and special teams.
Winning 7 or 8 games would be beyond disappointing. Posting up another mediocre season should start making CP's seat warm. And fuck PLSS and his 4-5 year timeline. -
Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters? -
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
-
I new you'd do it 4 mePurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters? -
PurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
-
Derek, can we have a "We Beat Idaho" button to go along with our "Chincredible" button?Houhusky said:PurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
@DerekJohnson -
Secondwhatshouldicareabout said:
Derek, can we have a "We Beat Idaho" button to go along with our "Chincredible" button?Houhusky said:PurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
@DerekJohnson -
Mods? Devs?whatshouldicareabout said:
Derek, can we have a "We Beat Idaho" button to go along with our "Chincredible" button?Houhusky said:PurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters?
@DerekJohnson -
I wonder what that guy is doing right now...I mean, nothing else matters besides beating Oregon and we haven't beaten Oregon yet so is he having an existential breakdown? Did he kill himself? Is he under a bridge muttering to himself "Masoli, Thomas, Mario, Adams, Masoli, Thomas, Mario, Adams..."?PurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters? -
Isn't this PLSS?Doogles said:
I wonder what that guy is doing right now...I mean, nothing else matters besides beating Oregon and we haven't beaten Oregon yet so is he having an existential breakdown? Did he kill himself? Is he under a bridge muttering to himself "Masoli, Thomas, Mario, Adams, Masoli, Thomas, Mario, Adams..."?PurpleBaze said:
Dude, you gotta post a picture of the doog t-shirt.section_332 said:Is it to early for the old:
Beat Oregon, nothing else matters? -
Pete needs five years. You have no idea the damage that Sark did.
I'm on board, but I'll believe we beat Stanford and Oregon when I see it. I don't think it will happen this year. If it doesn't Pete gets one more year in my mind to make it happen, but we know if he goes 9-4 he will probably get a lifetime extension. -
Pete could have another 7-6 campaign next year and he wouldn't get fired. I don't think he'd feel heat unless the team went 5-7. Just the reality of how the UW department works.RoadDawg55 said:Pete needs five years. You have no idea the damage that Sark did.
I'm on board, but I'll believe we beat Stanford and Oregon when I see it. I don't think it will happen this year. If it doesn't Pete gets one more year in my mind to make it happen, but we know if he goes 9-4 he will probably get a lifetime extension.
I think Pete is the one, but agree he needs to take down the North to prove it and i'm not sure if he will in 2016. He should, but 16 years of Husky football says he won't. -
I beat my meat for Pete
Also, Derek is still a fag -
From analyzing this thread, the bored consensus is that satisfaction is achieved with anywhere between 6 and 12 wins next year, or between a .500 and 1.000 winning percentage.
-
Chinsightful!MelloDawg said:From analyzing this thread, the bored consensus is that satisfaction is achieved with anywhere between 6 and 12 wins next year, or between a .500 and 1.000 winning percentage.
-
FTFYPurpleBaze said:
Chincredibly Chinsightful!MelloDawg said:From analyzing this thread, the bored consensus is that satisfaction is achieved with anywhere between 6 and 12 wins next year, or between a .500 and 1.000 winning percentage.
-
It's called a chindrome
