That call was total horse shit...
With that said, you can't outgain a top 5 team by 210 yards on the road and lose the game. The refs fucked it up but this one is on Sark. If we're disciplined we would have just beaten a top 5 team on the road by 2+ touchdowns. Inexcusable.
Comments
-
Agree, but we put it all on us. Refs were bad and we are an undisciplined football team that doesn't do the little things. Abundance. Of course, doogs will focus only on the call
-
If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Physics 101. -
That's exactly the point of the thread. Refs made an abysmal call but this one's on Sark.RoadDawg55 said:Agree, but we put it all on us. Refs were bad and we are an undisciplined football team that doesn't do the little things. Abundance. Of course, doogs will focus only on the call
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Wrong and it's a bullshit call to end a game.
Physics 101. -
It's abysmal to call a pass where the ball is on the ground an incomplete pass now?DugtheDoog said:
That's exactly the point of the thread. Refs made an abysmal call but this one's on Sark.RoadDawg55 said:Agree, but we put it all on us. Refs were bad and we are an undisciplined football team that doesn't do the little things. Abundance. Of course, doogs will focus only on the call
-
Right, but you said in the game thread you didn't think there was enough to overturn it. I agree with the logical conclusion, but that's not the same as indisputable evidence.TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Physics 101.
-
I watched it again and went frame by frame. It's abundantly clear when you look really closely at it.dnc said:
Right, but you said in the game thread you didn't think there was enough to overturn it. I agree with the logical conclusion, but that's not the same as indisputable evidence.TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Physics 101. -
You think they went frame by frame?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I watched it again and went frame by frame. It's abundantly clear when you look really closely at it.dnc said:
Right, but you said in the game thread you didn't think there was enough to overturn it. I agree with the logical conclusion, but that's not the same as indisputable evidence.TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Physics 101.
-
They have the technology to do so now, thanks in part to the Oklahomo ($75k) v Oregon fiasco.dnc said:
You think they went frame by frame?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I watched it again and went frame by frame. It's abundantly clear when you look really closely at it.dnc said:
Right, but you said in the game thread you didn't think there was enough to overturn it. I agree with the logical conclusion, but that's not the same as indisputable evidence.TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Physics 101.
ESPN did a lazy job with replays all through the game, and their work at the end was no exception. -
Arguing about indisputable evidence is being a pussy. Either you think it hit the ground or not. If you don't think it did, call it bullshit. I have no issue with that. But again, if you think it did, and are arguing about indisputable evidence, then you're being a cunt.
-
DNC's right. The ref's didn't go frame-by-frame. And I never said it did or didn't hit the ground. I said there really is no way to say definitively one way or the other in the 3 minutes the refs had.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I watched it again and went frame by frame. It's abundantly clear when you look really closely at it.dnc said:
Right, but you said in the game thread you didn't think there was enough to overturn it. I agree with the logical conclusion, but that's not the same as indisputable evidence.TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you can see the ball between the two arms on the ground, the ball has to have hit the ground.
Physics 101.
But that wasn't even the point of my post. The point was that everyone will blame the call when in fact it was on sark.
