Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

ESPNU just replayed UW vs. stanford 2012.

Passion
Passion Member Posts: 4,622
Man, neither offense looked good, but stanford's defense was very good. They just had a couple of breakdowns, and we made them pay.

Both offenses are much improved this year, but stanford clearly should be favored this year. Their QB (hogan) is ten-times better than the guy that UW played against last year (nunez).

Here comes the Broken Record: We didn't put nunez under a ton of pressure last year, but luckily for us we didn't have to because the guy was awful. This year is different. My gut tells me that stanford does a good job protecting hogan from our undersized DEs, and he completes passes down the field.

Meanwhile, stanford's defense will press our outside WRs in order to take away our quick passing game. And when Price tries to drop back and throw long, he will get pummeled.

I think stanford wins. Don't know the score.
«1

Comments

  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,677 Swaye's Wigwam
    I remember the Stanford receivers dropping a couple sure touchdowns as well. It was a big win on paper but our performance didn't instill a lot of confidence in me.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,363 Founders Club
    Agree, completely.
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    It was obvious Nunes' performance really sucked that night. What gets lost in the story was that the Dawgs held them to 2.3 avg. and 65 rushing yards. No other team (Wisconsin, ND, Oregon, etc) came close to that number.

    I would rather see them make the Tree beat them over the top then sit back in some soft D and get blasted by Gaffney all day. Have Peters lock onto Montgomery, stuff the box and take your chances from there.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

    It was obvious Nunes' performance really sucked that night. What gets lost in the story was that the Dawgs held them to 2.3 avg. and 65 rushing yards. No other team (Wisconsin, ND, Oregon, etc) came close to that number.

    I would rather see them make the Tree beat them over the top then sit back in some soft D and get blasted by Gaffney all day. Have Peters lock onto Montgomery, stuff the box and take your chances from there.

    Thing is, I don't think we can stop their run game even if we load the box. Not having Tokolahi really is going to play a big role in this game.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    It was obvious Nunes' performance really sucked that night. What gets lost in the story was that the Dawgs held them to 2.3 avg. and 65 rushing yards. No other team (Wisconsin, ND, Oregon, etc) came close to that number.

    I would rather see them make the Tree beat them over the top then sit back in some soft D and get blasted by Gaffney all day. Have Peters lock onto Montgomery, stuff the box and take your chances from there.

    It's a lot easier to stop the run when you don't fear the passing game at all.

    Will not be the case today.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,388 Founders Club
    I like the Huskies in that 2012 game
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    It was obvious Nunes' performance really sucked that night. What gets lost in the story was that the Dawgs held them to 2.3 avg. and 65 rushing yards. No other team (Wisconsin, ND, Oregon, etc) came close to that number.

    I would rather see them make the Tree beat them over the top then sit back in some soft D and get blasted by Gaffney all day. Have Peters lock onto Montgomery, stuff the box and take your chances from there.

    Thing is, I don't think we can stop their run game even if we load the box. Not having Tokolahi really is going to play a big role in this game.
    Yes, that is HUGE. Burning Tokolahi's redshirt was criminal.

    Even more criminal is that there aren't more Tokolahis and Sheltons on the roster.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,622 Swaye's Wigwam

    I remember the Stanford receivers dropping a couple sure touchdowns as well. It was a big win on paper but our performance didn't instill a lot of confidence in me.

    Agree. It instilled no confidence. We had an OL that couldn't block for shit and got very little pass rush. We all knew Oregon was going to plunger rape us the next week.

  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Wilcox dialed up a 4-4 defense to take away Stanford's ground game in '12. Gotta go heavy again (Cree?) to have a chance, and just live with fact that Hogan's gonna complete some passes. Gaffney scares me a lot more than their WRs do, and corners are a relative strength for UW.

    Press, blitz, and hold your breath.