Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Marcus Peters is already better than Sherman

NeGgaPlEaSe
NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,763
edited January 2016 in NFL Talk
He's more physical, better instincts and more athletic. Seahawks fucked up
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • section_332
    section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    Peters plays in the slot as well
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    They fucked up by taking Richard Sherman in the 5th round years ago and not trading up to get Marcus Peters in the draft because they had no reason to do it?

    K.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,144
    Lol. I love Peters, but Sherman has been doing this for years. Consistency matters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,763
    edited January 2016
    Missing the point, trade Sherman for draft picks, save on cap space sign a high profile defensive free agent with that money, draft Peters and keep going. Peters was in their back yard easy to evaluate. Is Sherman really that much better if at all? In my opinion no. $14,000,000 versus $1,700,000.

    I'm not a GM , but I do read hardcore husky
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section_332
    section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Missing the point, trade Sherman for draft picks, save on cap space sign a high profile defensive free agent with that money, draft Peters and keep going. Peters was in their back yard easy to evaluate. Is Sherman really that much better if at all? In my opinion no. $14,000,000 versus $1,700,000.

    I'm not a GM , but I do read hardcore husky

    It's a lot easier to draft a DB late and groom him to fit your scheme. Especially now since a lot of DBs go 6 ft in college now
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Missing the point, trade Sherman for draft picks, save on cap space sign a high profile defensive free agent with that money, draft Peters and keep going. Peters was in their back yard easy to evaluate. Is Sherman really that much better if at all? In my opinion no. $14,000,000 versus $1,700,000.

    I'm not a GM , but I do read hardcore husky

    Christ
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,272
    Peters is good.

    Sherman won Seattle a Super Bowl with his play on the ball against Crabtree in the 2014 NFC Champ game.

    I mean come on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Missing the point, trade Sherman for draft picks, save on cap space sign a high profile defensive free agent with that money, draft Peters and keep going. Peters was in their back yard easy to evaluate. Is Sherman really that much better if at all? In my opinion no. $14,000,000 versus $1,700,000.

    I'm not a GM , but I do read hardcore husky

    Wtf dawg.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,500 Founders Club
    phineas said:

    Shit thread

    and shit posters
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    dnc said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Missing the point, trade Sherman for draft picks, save on cap space sign a high profile defensive free agent with that money, draft Peters and keep going. Peters was in their back yard easy to evaluate. Is Sherman really that much better if at all? In my opinion no. $14,000,000 versus $1,700,000.

    I'm not a GM , but I do read hardcore husky

    Wow there are a lot of things wrong with this post. Off the top of my head:

    1. Sherman is a big part of this team's identity, you don't just trade that away.

    2. You probably wouldn't get a ton of picks for Sherman precisely because of the big cap hit. He's properly paid but not underpaid, so there's not much surplus value there. Nobody is trading multiple picks for any contracts as big as Sherman's in the modern NFL.

    3. The cap savings wouldn't be nearly as good as you think either because his entire signing bonus would have accelerated onto this year's cap. It would be cap savings for next year and going forward but would have crushed the cap this year.

    4. Peters is fucking good but he also got kicked off his college team for choking a corch insubordination. Yes, his talent is so great I would have taken him in the first round (and argued as much many times and bumped the idiots who said they wouldn't). But I wouldn't trade one of the top 10 defensive players in the league for someone with that much risk.

    5. You weren't advocating for such a plan before the draft, nor was anyone else, so saying Seattle "fucked up" is pretty FS.

    6. Kasen still doesn't have a TD.
    but still
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter