Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Presented w/o Comment: UW SRS Ranking Chart Back to 1975
Comments
-
So a .500 team is in the top 30, eh?
But how is the SRS a useless fucking stat!!!???? -
Ty told my brother that UW fans had unrealistic expectations and he believed the fans overestimated UWs winning potential. Worthless piece of shit.Alexis said:
ty needed more timePostGameOrangeSlices said:But what are we to infer from these analytics?
-
A few observations:
In '86, we were 8th or so (I can't really tell if the point isn't on a line).
We had a good team, but Alabama killed us in the
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH9Z6sr1ptQ
So 8-3-1 got us 8th?
In '88 we were 25th or so, which makes sense since we lost five games by about 12 points. I mean, it made sense in a SRS way...
2013 - Try hard but lost by a lot to whoregon, lost by way too many to ASU, played Stanford tough but lost, and lost to someone else. So that is good enough for 12th? -
It's actually on Jen's sloppy tits.Swaye said:
I assume the picture is from a wall at Joey's?H_D said:
Clearly you don't understand what Sark meant to the UW program.JaWarrenJaHooker said:So you're saying Sark is better than Ty?
-
I bet there's not a single Alabama fan that has ever heard of SRS rankingsHeretoBeatmyChest said:
-
MikeSeaver said:
I bet there's not a single Alabama fan that has ever heard ofHeretoBeatmyChest said:SRS rankingsthe importance of good dental hygiene.
-
Alabama uses a different metric: wis (wins in season)MikeSeaver said:
I bet there's not a single Alabama fan that has ever heard of SRS rankingsHeretoBeatmyChest said:
Anything below 8 two years in a row and your wis better be at least nine or it's coach selling season.
