Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

USC players say Sark betrayed them with lawsuit

«13

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
  • doogville
    doogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,253 Swaye's Wigwam
    That was not technically gifted writing.
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    Someone got paid to write that?
  • d2d
    d2d Member Posts: 3,109
    edited December 2015
    I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

    Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

    Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???
    "Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
    Thomas Sowell
  • skookum
    skookum Member Posts: 448
    edited December 2015
    he better get an assload of dough, he's never working again
    image
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    d2d said:

    I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

    Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

    Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

    "Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
    Thomas Sowell
    I thought the 80s were the conservative golden age. Now you are blaming liberals.

    Don't you have someone to sue for libel and slander?
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    d2d said:

    I predicted it. It's very difficult to fire an alcoholic on the first instance. (Just saying what the law is, NOT that I agree with it. I actually went though this in CA in the 80's with an employee.) It's just as hard as firing a minority (Coach); and we all remember what that was like. If they agree to go to rehab, you have to let them come back. We actually had to give him a urinalysis once a day for several months until he flunked one. THEN we could fire his worthless ass. It didn't even matter that he almost never did his job.

    Everybody now has extra rights including alcoholics. Except it's perfectly legal to discriminate against White, Heterosexual, Christian, Males of any age.

    Thanks Liberals. What HAVEN'T you screwed up in the past 35 years ???

    "Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good."
    Thomas Sowell
    Cool rant bro but just because you sue someone doesn't mean you're getting paid.