Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Generation Cry Baby: Why Millennials Are a Fucking Joke

17810121316

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I just realized after reading 5 pages why I kept ignoring this thread to begin with.

    Death. It's real easy to prove yourself right. Really I don't give a fuck, I just like to give you shit about the battlefield commission cause I can. But you clearly care so man up and show it or shut the fuck up.

    Funny.

    So you show you don't give a fuck by asking him to prove it?

    Seems like you care.
    Ironic.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I just realized after reading 5 pages why I kept ignoring this thread to begin with.

    Death. It's real easy to prove yourself right. Really I don't give a fuck, I just like to give you shit about the battlefield commission cause I can. But you clearly care so man up and show it or shut the fuck up.

    Funny.

    So you show you don't give a fuck by asking him to prove it?

    Seems like you care.
    Ironic.
    It also seems like you don't know what that word means.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,530 Standard Supporter
    PurpleJ said:

    I never served so I'm not going to call someone a liar who did. If AZ is on the case fine. If D2D is telling the truth a lot of you need to man up and apologize. If he is lying fuck him.

    He's lying.
    It's the Internet. Aren't we, like, kinda supposed to lie just a little?!?

  • d2d
    d2d Member Posts: 3,109
    RCW 9.58.010(1): Libel and Slander

    Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend: --

    (1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse[.] (Emphasis added.)


    For many months I have ignored the Libelous and Slanderous things said about me. No more.

    One thing about being a retired attorney whose license is in suspension because I don't want to keep paying about a thousand dollars a year for "continuing education" and Bar dues, is I have plenty of time to devote to one pro se lawsuit.

    I don't need to pay an attorney to represent me if I want to sue somebody, I can simply file it pro se. In this case it would be a John Doe(s) law suit against certain persons' screen name, and I would then amend the suit later with the your real name once I inspected Derek's records during discovery.

    There's an old saying that the most dangerous attorney is the one with only one case and lots of time on his hands. I guess that would describe me.

    Although I did not specialize in Libel Slander, I have represented three plaintiffs regarding Libel Slander. I won all three, and none were as clear cut as this. There is clearly malice and recklessness in this case. As such, the burden of proof shifts to the DEFENDANT, to prove you aren't libel for damages. By the way, this is BOTH a civil and a criminal statute and the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office owes me a favor.

    I like it in here, but I will not be slandered and libeled. Nor will I stand silent as my facebook account is hacked. I am NOT anonymous in here. I have signed several of my posts in dm.com with my real name. Yesterday, I published my picture, (both of which are more than you have).

    Knock it off now, or suffer the consequences.

    I will not comment on this any further in threads and will instead discuss the matter with Derek.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    d2d said:

    RCW 9.58.010(1): Libel and Slander

    Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend: --

    (1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse[.] (Emphasis added.)


    For many months I have ignored the Libelous and Slanderous things said about me. No more.

    One thing about being a retired attorney whose license is in suspension because I don't want to keep paying about a thousand dollars a year for "continuing education" and Bar dues, is I have plenty of time to devote to one pro se lawsuit.

    I don't need to pay an attorney to represent me if I want to sue somebody, I can simply file it pro se. In this case it would be a John Doe(s) law suit against certain persons' screen name, and I would then amend the suit later with the your real name once I inspected Derek's records during discovery.

    There's an old saying that the most dangerous attorney is the one with only one case and lots of time on his hands. I guess that would describe me.

    Although I did not specialize in Libel Slander, I have represented three plaintiffs regarding Libel Slander. I won all three, and none were as clear cut as this. There is clearly malice and recklessness in this case. As such, the burden of proof shifts to the DEFENDANT, to prove you aren't libel for damages. By the way, this is BOTH a civil and a criminal statute and the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office owes me a favor.

    I like it in here, but I will not be slandered and libeled. Nor will I stand silent as my facebook account is hacked. I am NOT anonymous in here. I have signed several of my posts in dm.com with my real name. Yesterday, I published my picture, (both of which are more than you have).

    Knock it off now, or suffer the consequences.

    I will not comment on this any further in threads and will instead discuss the matter with Derek.

    And I thought millennials were the pussies...CHRIST.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    I never served so I'm not going to call someone a liar who did. If AZ is on the case fine. If D2D is telling the truth a lot of you need to man up and apologize. If he is lying fuck him.

    Did we even have an army back then?
    No.

    Just a well regulated militia.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    d2d's pretend lawyer military hero butthurt rant delivered. What a complete pussy. Definitely never served in the Marines.