USC: Sark is full of shit
Comments
-
The ADA was practically gutted by the Supreme Court years ago. I don't know if it's been amended much since, but CA disability law might be more generous? Maybe I should read the Complaint? Naaaaaaaaaaah. I'll be busy with this instead.
-
Here are the realities:
- in California, the law is written and upheld in court with some basis to the claim.
- Sark's attorneys know he has no money and took this as a 1/3 contingency.
- Sark's attorneys know they won't win in court even with California precedent, they are looking to settle. Settling for $6 million nets them $2 million with little work.
- USC doesn't want a long drawn out legal battle even tho they know they will win. If they do win, Sark won't be able to pay their attorney fees. So they will be enticed to settle.
I figure Sark will net a couple million to sit on his floor (couch is sold) and not do anything. -
2001400ex said:
I figureSarkSarks ex-wife will net a couple million to sit on her couch and not do anything.
SC will probably settle, guy from the LA Times said they have insurance for this sort of thing but on the other hand they and their underwriters may just say FTG and fight it out. Either way it will be interesting. -
If this could get to trial the amount of material we will get is mind boggling.
Dirty laundry, from multiple sources, to the bazillionth degree.
Prayingdog.gif -
I've got pretty good tolerances, but even I would probably tire of the pathetic, nauseous, gory, icky details of Sark's & Haden's lives. Blech. Rather eat my own shit.BayDawg said:If this could get to trial the amount of material we will get is mind boggling.
Dirty laundry, from multiple sources, to the bazillionth degree.
Prayingdog.gif -
Someone ought to write a book about this shit.
-
DerekJohnson said:
Someone ought to write a book about this shit.
-
Is this bad lip reading or was that actually it, and in reference to what? This is an amazing gif, and it has been neatly packed into my bookmarks. Thank you, some beers for you.
GrundleStiltzkin said:CheersWestDawg said:
Actually he's Mr. 20,247 poasts.GrundleStiltzkin said:
"We"? Mr. 248 poasts?WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:We were right.
-
battlefield commission lawyer, now?2001400ex said:Here are the realities:
- in California, the law is written and upheld in court with some basis to the claim.
- Sark's attorneys know he has no money and took this as a 1/3 contingency.
- Sark's attorneys know they won't win in court even with California precedent, they are looking to settle. Settling for $6 million nets them $2 million with little work.
- USC doesn't want a long drawn out legal battle even tho they know they will win. If they do win, Sark won't be able to pay their attorney fees. So they will be enticed to settle.
I figure Sark will net a couple million to sit on his floor (couch is sold) and not do anything. -
Postal91 said:Is this bad lip reading or was that actually it, and in reference to what? This is an amazing gif, and it has been neatly packed into my bookmarks. Thank you, some beers for you.
GrundleStiltzkin said:CheersWestDawg said:
Actually he's Mr. 20,247 poasts.GrundleStiltzkin said:
"We"? Mr. 248 poasts?WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:We were right.
