UW vs. stanford by the numbers.
Comments
-
Normally I'd give the obligatory FO,G response, but I couldn't agree more. Raw stats are for losers (AND loosers (c) .. abundance).TheGlove said:stats are for loosers (c)
TheGlove -
There's nothing in the terms of service that states you can't tell The Glove to fuck off and agree with him too.Southerndawg said:
Normally I'd give the obligatory FO,G response, but I couldn't agree more. Raw stats are for losers (AND loosers (c) .. abundance).TheGlove said:stats are for loosers (c)
TheGlove -
Next year's OOC slateTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins.
-
Next year's OOC slate IS four schools of the blind.dnc said:
Next year's OOC slateTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins. -
Are you kidding? Stanford just faced the TUFFest Defense in the country!!1!!1!Gladstone said:
While overrated, BSU isn't a pushover and we also played a B10 team at a neutral-hostile site. Stanford and Oregon have yet to face teams that can punch them back a little bit.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins. -
Stanfraud really has not played anyone out of conference either. They had a hard time with US Military-West Pt.-Army or whatever they're going by this week for a while.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins. -
Well, they kicked the shit out of wazzu...who beat us last year. Just sayin'.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Stanfraud really has not played anyone out of conference either. They had a hard time with US Military-West Pt.-Army or whatever they're going by this week for a while.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins. -
Playing Army >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Playing Idaho State.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Stanfraud really has not played anyone out of conference either. They had a hard time with US Military-West Pt.-Army or whatever they're going by this week for a while.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins.
Die in a fucking fire. -
Crisped that up for you. You're welcome.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Playing Army >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Playing Idaho State.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Stanfraud really has not played anyone out of conference either. They had a hard time with US Military-West Pt.-Army or whatever they're going by this week for a while.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins.
Die in a fucking fire. -
They made ASU look like pumpchumps too.Passion said:
Well, they kicked the shit out of wazzu...who beat us last year. Just sayin'.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Stanfraud really has not played anyone out of conference either. They had a hard time with US Military-West Pt.-Army or whatever they're going by this week for a while.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Comparatively difficult to what? Playing schools for the blind?Gladstone said:
That our non-conference slate was comparatively difficult (notwithstanding ISU) makes those statistics all the more impressive. Hmmm.dnc said:Confirms what we already knew about the offense - racking up tons of yards, need to commit to FINISHING.
Usually teams that rack up lots of yards are eventually going to score lots of points. My guess is this offense will do a better job of punching it in, but mostly because they can't really do much worse.
It will be interesting to see how the defensive stats hold up now that the varsity schedule begins.
