Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Seahawks running the ball

2»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,168 Founders Club
    Someone get our visitor a nice glass of shut the fuck up please
  • Zaggot
    Zaggot Member Posts: 49

    dhdawg said:

    times in the NFL throw it more than they run it, it isn't an apples to apples comparison

    He knows that. He's just trolling and needs to get an IP ban already.
    I wasn't the one that compared apples to oranges. HNMT stated Seahawks run the ball like he wished UW did. I replied with UW runs the ball just as much as Seattle. He called me a liar.

    UW actually runs the ball more than Seattle. That is a fact. Not sure why HNMT brought up the point after 6 months. I would have just let the stupid debate end, but for some reason he is obsessed with me.

    Which team is running the ball more? UW or Seattle? Which team is running the ball at a higher percentage? UW or Seattle?

    HNMT wants a team that runs the ball and plays good defense like Seattle. He's just too fucking stupid to see he has it. I personally don't give a shit if UW runs the ball 10% of the time if they win every fucking game. That is what is so stupid about his argument. Move that bar!!!!!!
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Someone get our visitor a nice glass of shut the fuck up please

    IMAZAGGOT is *not* a visitor.
  • Get back to me in three weeks.....

    Remember last year when both were 4-4 I said the Seahawks would finish with the better season.

    I was right last year, you were wrong.

    The huskies and nowhere near the Seahawks level.
  • Zaggot
    Zaggot Member Posts: 49

    Get back to me in three weeks.....

    Remember last year when both were 4-4 I said the Seahawks would finish with the better season.

    I was right last year, you were wrong.

    The huskies and nowhere near the Seahawks level.

    They both finished ahead of two teams in their division. They both lost their last game of the season. They both got a participation trophy. Keep spinning away.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Zaggot said:

    Get back to me in three weeks.....

    Remember last year when both were 4-4 I said the Seahawks would finish with the better season.

    I was right last year, you were wrong.

    The huskies and nowhere near the Seahawks level.

    They both finished ahead of two teams in their division. They both lost their last game of the season. They both got a participation trophy. Keep spinning away.
    LOL. Fourth in the Pac-12 North is now equal to second in the NFC West.


    CHRIST
  • Zaggot
    Zaggot Member Posts: 49

    Zaggot said:

    Get back to me in three weeks.....

    Remember last year when both were 4-4 I said the Seahawks would finish with the better season.

    I was right last year, you were wrong.

    The huskies and nowhere near the Seahawks level.

    They both finished ahead of two teams in their division. They both lost their last game of the season. They both got a participation trophy. Keep spinning away.
    LOL. Fourth in the Pac-12 North is now equal to second in the NFC West.


    CHRIST
    I figured since running the ball 57% of the time is more than 65% of the time, I might as well throw that shit out there. Just trying to see which stats we are allowed to twist. I guess only the ones that follow the script. My bad.

    BTW Seattle was tied for 3rd/4th in the Conference. I guess that puts them as a top 8 team in the NFL or in the top 25%. That is some good shit right there, let's see HNMT spin some shit like that. Oh wait he already did. 57%>>>>>>>>>>>>>65%
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Zaggot said:

    Zaggot said:

    Get back to me in three weeks.....

    Remember last year when both were 4-4 I said the Seahawks would finish with the better season.

    I was right last year, you were wrong.

    The huskies and nowhere near the Seahawks level.

    They both finished ahead of two teams in their division. They both lost their last game of the season. They both got a participation trophy. Keep spinning away.
    LOL. Fourth in the Pac-12 North is now equal to second in the NFC West.


    CHRIST
    I figured since running the ball 57% of the time is more than 65% of the time, I might as well throw that shit out there. Just trying to see which stats we are allowed to twist. I guess only the ones that follow the script. My bad.

    BTW Seattle was tied for 3rd/4th in the Conference. I guess that puts them as a top 8 team in the NFL or in the top 25%. That is some good shit right there, let's see HNMT spin some shit like that. Oh wait he already did. 57%>>>>>>>>>>>>>65%
    Drunk posting rules.
  • Someone is pressing badly in this thread....
  • Zaggot
    Zaggot Member Posts: 49

    Someone is pressing badly in this thread....

    I agree 100%

    Trying to say that running 57% of the time is better than 65% is pressing about as fucking bad as you can press.
  • Zaggot said:

    Someone is pressing badly in this thread....

    I agree 100%

    Trying to say that running 57% of the time is better than 65% is pressing about as fucking bad as you can press.
    Comparing NFL to College is pressing.

    Claiming the Seahawks will ditch the run when falling behind is pressing.

    Comparing a team going 11-5 in the nfl as equal to 7-6 in college is ban worthy.