Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seahawks running the ball
Comments
-
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH. -
You're still here?
-
The point is you were wrong on your proclamation earlier in the game. Just own how you were wrong and light yourself on fire already.
-
Did the Hawks run the ball at a 60% clip? How was I wrong? They were 50/50 today instead of 57% as you proclaimed.
When you going to admit the Huskies run the ball more than the Seahawks? It's actually not even close. -
And now that the Huskies are running the ball so much, they are 4-0.Zaggot said:Did the Hawks run the ball at a 60% clip? How was I wrong? They were 50/50 today instead of 57% as you proclaimed.
When you going to admit the Huskies run the ball more than the Seahawks? It's actually not even close.
I would never have complained about Sark's run-pass ratio if it had been like this the last few years. -
times in the NFL throw it more than they run it, it isn't an apples to apples comparison
-
He knows that. He's just trolling and needs to get an IP ban already.dhdawg said:times in the NFL throw it more than they run it, it isn't an apples to apples comparison
-
Sacks are not rushing attempts in the NFL.Zaggot said:
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH.
-
And they are not a passing attempts in the NFL. They however were a passing play so need to be added into passing attempts when figuring out a run/pass ratio.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks are not rushing attempts in the NFL.Zaggot said:
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH.
Stay out of the big boy discussions. -
Mods?Zaggot said:
And they are not a passing attempts in the NFL. They however were a passing play so need to be added into passing attempts when figuring out a run/pass ratio.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks are not rushing attempts in the NFL.Zaggot said:
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH.
Stay out of the big boy discussions.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
