Seahawks running the ball
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
Well after three weeks the NFL average is 42% run and 58% pass.
However the Seahawks have ran the ball 57% leading the NFL in rushing percentage. They are also 3-0 as they grind the ball on their opponent, play tough defense and have smart play from the QB position. They are what the Huskies were under Don James.
Comments
-
What's your point?
-
But I will say, good teams do run more simply because that's what you do with a lead. Most bad teams pass more, because they are always playing from behind.
-
"Yeah, but how many of those runs are QB runs?"
-
I was taunting IMALOSER/Bronc4Blue/Factchecker since I know he stalks this board all the time.DeepSeaZ said:What's your point?
I remember he did his typical cherry picking of stats to show that Sark runs more than Carroll does which isn't the case.
He also ignored how in the NFL teams pass a lot more than typically in college too.
-
I like to say running the ball 57% of the time is more than running the ball 65% of the time. Yeah, that's what I like to do!!!!!
Is it cherry picking to use all of the games played this season?
Once a moron always a moron. Someone revoke this fuckers HHB card now!!!!!!
-
Seahawks led the fucking NFL in running the ball.Zaggot said:I like to say running the ball 57% of the time is more than running the ball 65% of the time. Yeah, that's what I like to do!!!!!
Is it cherry picking to use all of the games played this season?
Once a moron always a moron. Someone revoke this fuckers HHB card now!!!!!!
LEAVE!!!!!!! -
Sarkisian runs the ball more than Carroll........FACT!!!!!! I like how you have to cherry pick a league.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks led the fucking NFL in running the ball.Zaggot said:I like to say running the ball 57% of the time is more than running the ball 65% of the time. Yeah, that's what I like to do!!!!!
Is it cherry picking to use all of the games played this season?
Once a moron always a moron. Someone revoke this fuckers HHB card now!!!!!!
LEAVE!!!!!!! -
Mods?
-
Mods he needs a little help here? He is pressing badly again.He_Needs_More_Time said:Mods?
-
Mods please ban Zaggot.......he is making me look like a fucking moron again.
-
Why do you always skew stats? Seahawks lead the NFL in run to pass ratio a point you tried to argue in August.
I think we should do an IP ban hammer on IMALOSER/Bronc4Blue/Zaggot. -
Any guesses to who Zaggot really is?
-
Anyone who has been around message boards for more than a few minutes knows exactly who Zaggot is. It's never even been a secret.CuntWaffle said:Any guesses to who Zaggot really is?
Adam Morrison is 10x the player Brandon Roy will ever be.
Do you want a fucking prize?
-
What are you offering?Zaggot said:
Anyone who has been around message boards for more than a few minutes knows exactly who Zaggot is.CuntWaffle said:Any guesses to who Zaggot really is?
Adam Morrison is 10x the player Brandon Roy will ever be.
Do you want a fucking prize? -
Time to take out the trash before he destroys this bored like he did Dawgbored.Zaggot said:
Anyone who has been around message boards for more than a few minutes knows exactly who Zaggot is. It's never even been a secret.CuntWaffle said:Any guesses to who Zaggot really is?
Adam Morrison is 10x the player Brandon Roy will ever be.
Do you want a fucking prize? -
I feel sorry for all you fuckers who want to use McDonalds free internet.He_Needs_More_Time said:Why do you always skew stats? Seahawks lead the NFL in run to pass ratio a point you tried to argue in August.
I think we should do an IP ban hammer on IMALOSER/Bronc4Blue/Zaggot.
PS. If you still think I was Bronc4Blue, even the mods can't help you. -
Get back to work!Zaggot said:
I feel sorry for all you fuckers who want to use McDonalds free internet.He_Needs_More_Time said:Why do you always skew stats? Seahawks lead the NFL in run to pass ratio a point you tried to argue in August.
I think we should do an IP ban hammer on IMALOSER/Bronc4Blue/Zaggot. -
Back on topic.
65% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>57%
FACT!!!!!! -
Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
-
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3. -
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH. -
You're still here?
-
The point is you were wrong on your proclamation earlier in the game. Just own how you were wrong and light yourself on fire already.
-
Did the Hawks run the ball at a 60% clip? How was I wrong? They were 50/50 today instead of 57% as you proclaimed.
When you going to admit the Huskies run the ball more than the Seahawks? It's actually not even close. -
And now that the Huskies are running the ball so much, they are 4-0.Zaggot said:Did the Hawks run the ball at a 60% clip? How was I wrong? They were 50/50 today instead of 57% as you proclaimed.
When you going to admit the Huskies run the ball more than the Seahawks? It's actually not even close.
I would never have complained about Sark's run-pass ratio if it had been like this the last few years. -
times in the NFL throw it more than they run it, it isn't an apples to apples comparison
-
He knows that. He's just trolling and needs to get an IP ban already.dhdawg said:times in the NFL throw it more than they run it, it isn't an apples to apples comparison
-
Sacks are not rushing attempts in the NFL.Zaggot said:
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH.
-
And they are not a passing attempts in the NFL. They however were a passing play so need to be added into passing attempts when figuring out a run/pass ratio.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks are not rushing attempts in the NFL.Zaggot said:
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH.
Stay out of the big boy discussions. -
Mods?Zaggot said:
And they are not a passing attempts in the NFL. They however were a passing play so need to be added into passing attempts when figuring out a run/pass ratio.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks are not rushing attempts in the NFL.Zaggot said:
You conveniently leave out the 5 sacks, so in reality they were 50/50 run/pass. I mean, it's not like Carroll gave the ball to Lynch 40 times. See what I did there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Seahawks ran the ball 30 times, they threw the ball 23 times. Some of those Wilson runs were scrambles but some were also designed runs.Zaggot said:Oh, oh.......Seattle getting ready to go down 21-3.......this might just fuck up your run pass ratio boner.
They never ditched the run down 20-3.
Still fail to see how Carroll running the ball 50% of the time today makes him more of a run first coach than Sark. I mean the Huskies RB's only had 53 rushing attempts yesterday. I just wish Sark would run the ball. I bet you liked it when Carroll ran the ball on 3rd-1 and 3rd-2 and was stuffed both times by an 8 man front.
Matt Schaub won that game for the Seahawks not running the ball 50% of the time. HTH.
Stay out of the big boy discussions.