Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Go Back in time to 8/31/2015
godawgst
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,618 
Had I told you what the D has done, and listed the opponents scores in order 16/0/17/30/12/26/31/3/34/24/7 how many wins would you think we have?
minimum 6 and imo 7.
So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?
minimum 6 and imo 7.
So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?
Comments
-
Go back in time?
I don't deal with hypotheticals -
Vegas had UW at 4.5 wins.
HTH -
Agreed. Minimum 6 and you'd hope for 7.godawgst said:Had I told you what the D has done, and listed the opponents scores in order 16/0/17/30/12/26/31/3/34/24/7 how many wins would you think we have?
minimum 6 and imo 7.
So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?
We knew the offense was going to be bad and especially in the first half of the season. -
I would have thought 5 or 6 ... I predicted 6 for the season
I'm reserving my comments on the season until it is completely over. -
What do losers write?2001400ex said:Vegas had UW at 4.5 wins.
HTH -
My point was we thought this was a .500 team with the O struggling and the D regressing from 2014. The O has been what we thought, while the D has been very good and worth a win or two more this year, yet we still have to beat the Cougs to get to .500.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Agreed. Minimum 6 and you'd hope for 7.godawgst said:Had I told you what the D has done, and listed the opponents scores in order 16/0/17/30/12/26/31/3/34/24/7 how many wins would you think we have?
minimum 6 and imo 7.
So have we underachieved/overachieved this year?
We knew the offense was going to be bad and especially in the first half of the season. -
With this schedule?
Total fucking failure. -
Fuck me.
Now, we're slicing and dicing between 6 and 7 wins to define success? -
I think its more like the definition of how fucked it has beensarktastic said:Fuck me.
Now, we're slicing and dicing between 6 and 7 wins to define success? -
The D has actually cost us a game or two. The ASU and Utah games come to mind. Not what I consider good. A team strength sure, but on a 5-6 team. Better than Sark's defenses sure, but not a very high bar.
