Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump on security
2001400ex
Member Posts: 29,457
in Tug Tavern
After Paris, Trump said “security is going to rule” in the United States, in order to take on what he calls “radical Islamic terrorism.” America has currently agreed to take in 10,000 refugees from the ISIS stronghold in Syria. However, if he is elected, Trump said he would deport any Syrian refugees allowed to enter this country under President Obama.
“They’re going to be gone. They will go back. … I’ve said it before, in fact, and everyone hears what I say, including them, believe it or not,” Trump said of the refugees. “But if they’re here, they have to go back, because we cannot take a chance. You look at the migration, it’s young, strong men. We cannot take a chance that the people coming over here are going to be ISIS-affiliated.”
Yahoo News has reported that about half of the approximately 2,000 refugees from Syria who have come to the U.S. so far have been children. Another quarter are more than 60 years old. The Obama administration has maintained that the extensive screening process for these refugees makes the program safe to maintain — not to mention a reflection of America’s core values.
But Trump doesn’t buy it. He also has concerns about the larger Muslim community here in the U.S., he said.
Yahoo News asked Trump whether his push for increased surveillance of American Muslims could include warrantless searches. He suggested he would consider a series of drastic measures.
“We’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule,” Trump said. “And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country in terms of information and learning about the enemy. And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago.”
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/donald-trump-has-big-plans-1303117537878070.html
“They’re going to be gone. They will go back. … I’ve said it before, in fact, and everyone hears what I say, including them, believe it or not,” Trump said of the refugees. “But if they’re here, they have to go back, because we cannot take a chance. You look at the migration, it’s young, strong men. We cannot take a chance that the people coming over here are going to be ISIS-affiliated.”
Yahoo News has reported that about half of the approximately 2,000 refugees from Syria who have come to the U.S. so far have been children. Another quarter are more than 60 years old. The Obama administration has maintained that the extensive screening process for these refugees makes the program safe to maintain — not to mention a reflection of America’s core values.
But Trump doesn’t buy it. He also has concerns about the larger Muslim community here in the U.S., he said.
Yahoo News asked Trump whether his push for increased surveillance of American Muslims could include warrantless searches. He suggested he would consider a series of drastic measures.
“We’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule,” Trump said. “And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country in terms of information and learning about the enemy. And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago.”
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/donald-trump-has-big-plans-1303117537878070.html
Comments
-
If anyone asks, I'm one of @Swaye people.
-
unless you're daughter is wearing the mark of Swaye tatood on her tit, you aren't.
-
your*
-
62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
-
yore*dnc said:your*
-
All will be Freedom loving people only interested in contributing and succeeding in the Great Democracy that is the United States of America. It is their birthright.
-
salemcoog said:
All will be Freedom loving people only interested in contributing and succeeding in the Great Satan that is the United States of America. It is their birthright.
-
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country. -
Conscript them into a European Union fighting force and ship their ass back to fight. Keep the women and children.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
Old skool privateer methods.
-
This is where Rush Limbaugh dick sucking meatheads get caught up in the faux outrage of the day.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country.
You really think they are just going to let a bunch of Syrians in here and not very one of them? And 62% of them are military grade men in their 20s?
Fuck you are stupid and gullible. -
Fuck off. There are thousands of idiots who are outraged just because people are calling for tighter security on the internet. I'm guessing you're one of them.2001400ex said:
This is where Rush Limbaugh dick sucking meatheads get caught up in the faux outrage of the day.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country.
You really think they are just going to let a bunch of Syrians in here and not very one of them? And 62% of them are military grade men in their 20s?
Fuck you are stupid and gullible. -
Even other liberals think Hondo is pressing
-
Since when did radical islam use exclusively 20 something males to carry out their attacks?2001400ex said:
This is where Rush Limbaugh dick sucking meatheads get caught up in the faux outrage of the day.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country.
You really think they are just going to let a bunch of Syrians in here and not very one of them? And 62% of them are military grade men in their 20s?
Fuck you are stupid and gullible.
They aren't telling little Akmed to go home, have an ice cream, and come back when he's 18. They are putting a bomb in his waffle cone and telling him he'll have ice cream for all eternity if he shares it with the infidels.
They'll strap bombs on their bitches too, they don't give a fuck. One of the french suicide bombers was some chick the mastermind recruited from facebook and was banging.
You're fucking stupid and gullible if you think they are going to stop using these tactics, especially when so many like you will walk them through the gate. -
According to the UN it was actually 73% or so, but then they "readjusted" the number down to 62%. And how again do you "vet" any of them when there is no information held by the country they live in about who they are and what they have done? The FBI said its not possible, so of course HondoFS thinks it is.2001400ex said:
You really think they are just going to let a bunch of Syrians in here and not very one of them? And 62% of them are military grade men in their 20s?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country.
And I like the new qualification of only in their 20s...one might be cynical and point out the terrorist fugitive they are looking for in Belgium is in his 30s...
HondoFS...
-
I welcome Tumors on my body. Not all of them are malignant!
-
That's it, *yore off HondoFS' Christmas list.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country. -
pawz said:
That's it, *yore off HondoFS'Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This is where many of my fellow liberals are naïve, stupid, and caught up in political correctness and a great desire to prove how inclusive they are. They hear Trump and want to do the opposite because Trump was mean to Messicans and bad lesbian comics.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
The refugees need to be vetted. It's a bad situation for them, but to not do so is FS. Protect your country.ChristmasRamadan list. -
The US vetting process for refugees takes two yeras on average. So yes, it will be different.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
This shit takes less than 10 seconds to look up. Jesus. -
If it takes two years why is Obama pissing all over himself now about it? Get back to us in 2 years when you have the vetting done and we'll talk
-
I agree with Hondo on some things but he's blinded by his news sources on this one. Amy Goodman won't tell you the real deal all the time bud.
-
Spending two years vetting nonexistent databases should fix everything. And did we start already vetting the 100,000 Syrians he wants to bring in next year? Didn't think so...UWhuskytskeet said:
The US vetting process for refugees takes two yeras on average. So yes, it will be different.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
This shit takes less than 10 seconds to look up. Jesus.
Effin moron... -
I didn't get anything from any news source. It's just common sense, it's not like tomorrow we are going to let 6,200 (62% of 10,000) military grade men into our country as Houston suggests. And it's not like there's no vetting process that others are suggesting.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I agree with Hondo on some things but he's blinded by his news sources on this one. Amy Goodman won't tell you the real deal all the time bud.
I'm going to use everyone's favorite gun control example. Do you really think ISIS is going to enter our country legally? No they are going to get in the same way they do right now. -
walk thru open, undefended borders?
-
Where are you getting 100,000? It's 10,000, and yes I would imagine the process has already started.HoustonHusky said:
Spending two years vetting nonexistent databases should fix everything. And did we start already vetting the 100,000 Syrians he wants to bring in next year? Didn't think so...UWhuskytskeet said:
The US vetting process for refugees takes two yeras on average. So yes, it will be different.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
This shit takes less than 10 seconds to look up. Jesus.
Effin moron...
What do you think would be more difficult to do; be successfully vetted and allowed into the US as a refugee, or travel to the US as a tourist? You don't have to establish residency before you shoot up a theater. -
Jeez, patriarchy much?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I agree with Hondo on some things but he's blinded by his news sources on this one. Amy Goodman won't tell you the real deal all the time bud.
-
The politicking on this refugee issue has been terrible on all sides.
"I love poor, freedom yearning brown people, the other guys hates them."
"I love keeping our nation secure, the other guys hate America."
Our immigration situation is not Europe's. The simpler way to get Jihadi Joe into the country remains walking him through the Southern border.
-
No, it's actually 65,000 if you want to get specific.UWhuskytskeet said:
Where are you getting 100,000? It's 10,000, and yes I would imagine the process has already started.HoustonHusky said:
Spending two years vetting nonexistent databases should fix everything. And did we start already vetting the 100,000 Syrians he wants to bring in next year? Didn't think so...UWhuskytskeet said:
The US vetting process for refugees takes two yeras on average. So yes, it will be different.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
This shit takes less than 10 seconds to look up. Jesus.
Effin moron...
What do you think would be more difficult to do; be successfully vetted and allowed into the US as a refugee, or travel to the US as a tourist? You don't have to establish residency before you shoot up a theater.
"I would like to see us move from what is a good start with 10,000 to 65,000"
Keep trying...
-
I thought a good start was 10,000 attorneys buried to their neck in sand?HoustonHusky said:
No, it's actually 65,000 if you want to get specific.UWhuskytskeet said:
Where are you getting 100,000? It's 10,000, and yes I would imagine the process has already started.HoustonHusky said:
Spending two years vetting nonexistent databases should fix everything. And did we start already vetting the 100,000 Syrians he wants to bring in next year? Didn't think so...UWhuskytskeet said:
The US vetting process for refugees takes two yeras on average. So yes, it will be different.HoustonHusky said:62% of the Syrian refugees that have gone to Europe are military age men. I'm sure our refugees will de different...
This shit takes less than 10 seconds to look up. Jesus.
Effin moron...
What do you think would be more difficult to do; be successfully vetted and allowed into the US as a refugee, or travel to the US as a tourist? You don't have to establish residency before you shoot up a theater.
"I would like to see us move from what is a good start with 10,000 to 65,000"
Keep trying...
It's actually hilarious you, a supposedly educated person, buys off on the GOP scare machine. Like what has been mentioned, ISIS will not enter legally under this program. You act like ISIS isn't already here. -
Its not surprising you, a moron, are lapping this up when even many of your fellow Liberals think its FS.
Anyone should be offended by this on many fronts. We aren't a dictatorship...the law is pretty clear on who is classified as a refugee. When the president can't get that right its not a good start. On top of that, the law is the law...you want to expand it then pass a law raising the numbers allowed as refugees. You can just decree 'We will do this' when the law doesn't say that...like it or not, that's not how our system works. And if you are actually interested in helping people, you can much more efficiently help more refugees by not flying them here and paying them via government subsidies but instead setting up safe zones either there or near there (Turkey?). Its what Clinton did in the 90s...for the same cost you can help at least 5x to 10x the number of people. And to top that off, if you think you could accurately do background checks on 65,000 refugees a year from a country with no infrastructure then you are as FS as you appear to be.
HondoFS... -
Oh my...
