Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Okung queeeerieie

TTJ
TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
in NFL Talk
Does the zero-sack win against the Cowboys, with Okung on the bench, reduce the odds that SEA re-signs Okung to zero?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    I hope so. I actually like Okung, but he's going to get paid way more than he earns.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    I think the zero-sack performance was more about the game plan than the O line. Bailey was getting owned by Hardy right from the snap, but Wilson was releasing the ball faster than I've ever seen.

    Okung is still on the pre-CBA rookie wage so he's making way more than he should, if they want to keep him it could end up being for the same amount he's making now. Personally I think they should let him go though, he keeps regressing and is always hurt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    SteveInShelton said:

    I think the zero-sack performance was more about the game plan than the O line. Bailey was getting owned by Hardy right from the snap, but Wilson was releasing the ball faster than I've ever seen.

    Okung is still on the pre-CBA rookie wage so he's making way more than he should, if they want to keep him it could end up being for the same amount he's making now. Personally I think they should let him go though, he keeps regressing and is always hurt.

    Dallas also brought just a four man rush more often than any team they've faced all season. Dallas obviously thought they could get to Wilson without blitzing, and they did get decent pressure, but I doubt anyone else will be following that example. They'll see more blitzes going forward.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter